universal-analytics vs Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of universal-analytics and Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

universal-analytics scores 0.0/100 (D) while Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button scores 62.0/100 (C+) on the Nerq Trust Score. Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button leads by 62.0 points. universal-analytics is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button is a uncategorized agent with 4 stars.
0.0
D
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm_full
Compliance100
vs
62.0
C+
Categoryuncategorized
Stars4
Sourcewordpress
Security90
Maintenance69
Documentation40

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric universal-analytics Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button
Trust Score0.0/10062.0/100
GradeDC+
Stars04
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
SecurityN/A90
Compliance100N/A
MaintenanceN/A69
DocumentationN/A40
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button leads with a trust score of 62.0/100 compared to universal-analytics's 0.0/100 (a 62.0-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. universal-analytics scores N/A and Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button scores 90 on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. universal-analytics: N/A, Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button: 69.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. universal-analytics: N/A, Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button: 40.

Community & Adoption

universal-analytics has 0 GitHub stars while Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button has 4. Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose universal-analytics if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (4 vs 0 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from universal-analytics to Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button (or vice versa)

When migrating between universal-analytics and Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: universal-analytics (uncategorized) and Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the universal-analytics safety report and Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: universal-analytics has 0 stars and Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button has 4. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
universal-analytics Safety Report Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button Safety Report universal-analytics Alternatives Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, universal-analytics or Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, universal-analytics has a trust score of 0.0/100 (D) while Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button scores 62.0/100 (C+). The 62.0-point difference suggests Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do universal-analytics and Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button compare on security?
universal-analytics has a security score of N/A/100 and Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button scores 90/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. universal-analytics's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A), while Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use universal-analytics or Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button?
The choice depends on your requirements. universal-analytics (uncategorized, 0 stars) and Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button (uncategorized, 4 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, universal-analytics scores 0.0/100 and Super Web Share – Native Social Sharing Button scores 62.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (N/A vs 40), and maintenance activity (N/A vs 69).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-10-17 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy