Je Powerguard bezpečný?
Powerguard — Nerq Trust Score 58.5/100 (Stupeň D). Na základě analýzy 5 dimenzí důvěryhodnosti je má pozoruhodné bezpečnostní obavy. Naposledy aktualizováno: 2026-04-02.
Používejte Powerguard s opatrností. Powerguard is a software tool se skóre důvěryhodnosti Nerq 58.5/100 (D), based on 5 independent data dimensions. Je pod doporučeným prahem 70. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-04-02. Strojově čitelná data (JSON).
Je Powerguard bezpečný?
OPATRNOST — Powerguard má skóre důvěryhodnosti Nerq 58.5/100 (D). Má střední signály důvěryhodnosti, ale vykazuje některé oblasti vyžadující pozornost. Vhodné pro vývojové použití — zkontrolujte bezpečnostní signály a signály údržby před nasazením do produkce.
Jaké je skóre důvěryhodnosti Powerguard?
Powerguard má Nerq skóre důvěryhodnosti 58.5/100 se stupněm D. Toto skóre je založeno na 5 nezávisle měřených dimenzích.
Jaká jsou klíčová bezpečnostní zjištění pro Powerguard?
Nejsilnější signál Powerguard je shoda na 97/100. Nebyly zjištěny žádné známé zranitelnosti. Dosud nedosáhl ověřeného prahu Nerq 70+.
Co je Powerguard a kdo jej spravuje?
| Autor | TenRoot |
| Kategorie | bezpečnost |
| Hvězdičky | 8 |
| Zdroj | https://github.com/TenRoot/PowerGuard |
Regulační shoda
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 97/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Populární alternativy v security
What Is Powerguard?
Powerguard is a security tool: PowerGuard Cloud monitors and analyzes PowerShell activity in Entra ID-joined environments.. It has 8 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 58/100 (D).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.
How Nerq Assesses Powerguard's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Powerguard performs in each:
- Bezpečnost (0/100): Powerguard's security posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Údržba (1/100): Powerguard is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (97/100): Powerguard is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Based on GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 58.5/100 (D) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Powerguard?
Powerguard is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with security tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Powerguard is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Powerguard's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Powerguard's dependency tree. - Recenze permissions — Understand what access Powerguard requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Powerguard in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=PowerGuard - Zkontrolujte license — Confirm that Powerguard's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Powerguard
When evaluating whether Powerguard is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Powerguard processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Powerguard's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Powerguard. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Powerguard connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Powerguard's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Powerguard in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Powerguard and the EU AI Act
Powerguard is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's compliance assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal compliance.
Best Practices for Using Powerguard Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Powerguard while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Powerguard is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Powerguard and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Powerguard only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Powerguard's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Powerguard is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Powerguard?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Powerguard in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional compliance review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Powerguard 58.5/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Powerguard Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among security tools, the average Trust Score is 67/100. Powerguard's score of 58.5/100 is near the category average of 67/100.
This places Powerguard in line with the typical security tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Powerguard and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Powerguard's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Powerguard's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=PowerGuard&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Powerguard are strengthening or weakening over time.
Powerguard vs Alternatives
V kategorii security, Powerguard získal skóre 58.5/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Powerguard vs Ciphey — Trust Score: 73.8/100
- Powerguard vs strix — Trust Score: 73.8/100
- Powerguard vs SWE-agent — Trust Score: 91.3/100
Hlavní závěry
- Powerguard má skóre důvěryhodnosti 58.5/100 (D) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Powerguard shows moderate trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among security tools, Powerguard scores near the category average of 67/100, suggesting room for improvement relative to peers.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Často kladené otázky
Je Powerguard bezpečný k použití?
Jaké je skóre důvěryhodnosti Powerguard?
Jaké jsou bezpečnější alternativy k Powerguard?
How often is Powerguard's safety score updated?
Mohu použít Powerguard v regulovaném prostředí?
Disclaimer: Skóre důvěryhodnosti Nerq jsou automatizovaná hodnocení založená na veřejně dostupných signálech. Nejsou doporučením ani zárukou. Vždy proveďte vlastní ověření.