Ist Agent Browser Ext sicher?
Agent Browser Ext — Nerq Trust Score 62.6/100 (Note C). Basierend auf der Analyse von 5 Vertrauensdimensionen wird es als generell sicher, aber mit einigen Bedenken eingestuft. Zuletzt aktualisiert: 2026-04-02.
Verwende Agent Browser Ext mit Vorsicht. Agent Browser Ext is a software tool mit einer Nerq-Vertrauensbewertung von 62.6/100 (C), based on 5 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-04-02. Maschinenlesbare Daten (JSON).
Ist Agent Browser Ext sicher?
CAUTION — Agent Browser Ext hat eine Nerq-Vertrauensbewertung von 62.6/100 (C). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.
Was ist die Vertrauensbewertung von Agent Browser Ext?
Agent Browser Ext hat eine Nerq-Vertrauensbewertung von 62.6/100 und erhält die Note C. Diese Bewertung basiert auf 5 unabhängig gemessenen Dimensionen.
Was sind die wichtigsten Sicherheitsergebnisse für Agent Browser Ext?
Das stärkste Signal von Agent Browser Ext ist konformität mit 80/100. Es wurden keine bekannten Schwachstellen erkannt. Hat die Nerq-Vertrauensschwelle von 70+ noch nicht erreicht.
Was ist Agent Browser Ext und wer pflegt es?
| Autor | oneilltomhq |
| Kategorie | devops |
| Quelle | https://github.com/oneilltomhq/agent-browser-ext |
Regulatorische Konformität
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 80/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Beliebte Alternativen in devops
What Is Agent Browser Ext?
Agent Browser Ext is a DevOps tool: Chrome extension for in-browser automation via LLM agents.. Nerq Trust Score: 63/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.
How Nerq Assesses Agent Browser Ext's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Agent Browser Ext performs in each:
- Sicherheit (0/100): Agent Browser Ext's security posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Wartung (1/100): Agent Browser Ext is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (80/100): Agent Browser Ext is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Based on GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 62.6/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Agent Browser Ext?
Agent Browser Ext is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with devops tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Agent Browser Ext is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Agent Browser Ext's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Agent Browser Ext's dependency tree. - Bewertung permissions — Understand what access Agent Browser Ext requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Agent Browser Ext in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=agent-browser-ext - Überprüfen Sie das/die license — Confirm that Agent Browser Ext's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Agent Browser Ext
When evaluating whether Agent Browser Ext is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Agent Browser Ext processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Agent Browser Ext's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Agent Browser Ext. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Agent Browser Ext connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Agent Browser Ext's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Agent Browser Ext in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Agent Browser Ext and the EU AI Act
Agent Browser Ext is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's compliance assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal compliance.
Best Practices for Using Agent Browser Ext Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Agent Browser Ext while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Agent Browser Ext is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Agent Browser Ext and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Agent Browser Ext only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Agent Browser Ext's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Agent Browser Ext is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Agent Browser Ext?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Agent Browser Ext in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional compliance review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Agent Browser Ext von 62.6/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Agent Browser Ext Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among DevOps tools, the average Trust Score is 63/100. Agent Browser Ext's score of 62.6/100 is near the category average of 63/100.
This places Agent Browser Ext in line with the typical DevOps tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Agent Browser Ext and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Agent Browser Ext's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Agent Browser Ext's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=agent-browser-ext&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Agent Browser Ext are strengthening or weakening over time.
Agent Browser Ext vs Alternatives
In the devops category, Agent Browser Ext erzielt 62.6/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Agent Browser Ext vs ansible — Trust Score: 84.3/100
- Agent Browser Ext vs Flowise — Trust Score: 76.9/100
- Agent Browser Ext vs learn-claude-code — Trust Score: 81.5/100
Wichtigste Punkte
- Agent Browser Ext hat eine Vertrauensbewertung von 62.6/100 (C) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Agent Browser Ext shows moderate trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among DevOps tools, Agent Browser Ext erzielt near the category average of 63/100, suggesting room for improvement relative to peers.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Ist Agent Browser Ext sicher in der Verwendung?
Was ist Agent Browser Ext's trust score?
Was sind sicherere Alternativen zu Agent Browser Ext?
How often is Agent Browser Ext's safety score updated?
Can I use Agent Browser Ext in a regulated environment?
Disclaimer: Nerq-Vertrauensbewertungen sind automatisierte Bewertungen basierend auf öffentlich verfügbaren Signalen. Sie sind keine Empfehlungen oder Garantien. Führen Sie immer Ihre eigene Sorgfaltsprüfung durch.