Ist Ghostprotocol sicher?
Verwende Ghostprotocol mit Vorsicht. Ghostprotocol is a software tool mit einer Nerq-Vertrauensbewertung von 67.5/100 (C), based on 5 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-26. Maschinenlesbare Daten (JSON).
Ist Ghostprotocol sicher?
CAUTION — Ghostprotocol hat eine Nerq-Vertrauensbewertung von 67.5/100 (C). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.
Vertrauensbewertung im Detail
Wichtige Erkenntnisse
Details
| Autor | Jpatching |
| Kategorie | legal |
| Quelle | https://github.com/Jpatching/ghostprotocol |
| Frameworks | anthropic |
| Protocols | rest |
Regulatorische Konformität
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Beliebte Alternativen in legal
What Is Ghostprotocol?
Ghostprotocol is a software tool in the legal category: Local-first AI agent desktop app that fights corporations on your behalf.. Nerq Trust Score: 68/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.
How Nerq Assesses Ghostprotocol's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Ghostprotocol performs in each:
- Sicherheit (0/100): Ghostprotocol's security posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Wartung (1/100): Ghostprotocol is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (100/100): Ghostprotocol is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Based on GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 67.5/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Ghostprotocol?
Ghostprotocol is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with legal tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Ghostprotocol is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Ghostprotocol's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Ghostprotocol's dependency tree. - Bewertung permissions — Understand what access Ghostprotocol requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Ghostprotocol in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=ghostprotocol - Überprüfen Sie das/die license — Confirm that Ghostprotocol's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Ghostprotocol
When evaluating whether Ghostprotocol is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Ghostprotocol processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Ghostprotocol's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Ghostprotocol. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Ghostprotocol connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Ghostprotocol's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Ghostprotocol in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Ghostprotocol and the EU AI Act
Ghostprotocol is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's compliance assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal compliance.
Best Practices for Using Ghostprotocol Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Ghostprotocol while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Ghostprotocol is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Ghostprotocol and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Ghostprotocol only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Ghostprotocol's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Ghostprotocol is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Ghostprotocol?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Ghostprotocol in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional compliance review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Ghostprotocol von 67.5/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Ghostprotocol Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among legal tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Ghostprotocol's score of 67.5/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Ghostprotocol favorably among legal tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensions.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Ghostprotocol and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Ghostprotocol's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Ghostprotocol's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=ghostprotocol&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Ghostprotocol are strengthening or weakening over time.
Ghostprotocol vs Alternatives
In the legal category, Ghostprotocol erzielt 67.5/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Ghostprotocol vs PDR_AI_v2 — Trust Score: 69.8/100
- Ghostprotocol vs ai-legal-compliance-assistant — Trust Score: 67.5/100
- Ghostprotocol vs lawglance — Trust Score: 69.9/100
Wichtigste Punkte
- Ghostprotocol hat eine Vertrauensbewertung von 67.5/100 (C) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Ghostprotocol shows moderate trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among legal tools, Ghostprotocol erzielt above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Ist Ghostprotocol sicher in der Verwendung?
Was ist Ghostprotocol's trust score?
Was sind sicherere Alternativen zu Ghostprotocol?
How often is Ghostprotocol's safety score updated?
Can I use Ghostprotocol in a regulated environment?
Disclaimer: Nerq-Vertrauensbewertungen sind automatisierte Bewertungen basierend auf öffentlich verfügbaren Signalen. Sie sind keine Empfehlungen oder Garantien. Führen Sie immer Ihre eigene Sorgfaltsprüfung durch.