51 est-il sûr ?

51 — Nerq Trust Score 50.6/100 (Note D). Sur la base de l'analyse de 1 dimensions de confiance, il est a des préoccupations de sécurité notables. Dernière mise à jour : 2026-04-01.

Utilisez 51 avec précaution. 51 is a software tool avec un Score de Confiance Nerq de 50.6/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-04-01. Données lisibles par machine (JSON).

51 est-il sûr ?

CAUTION — 51 a un Score de Confiance Nerq de 50.6/100 (D). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Analyse de Sécurité → Rapport de confidentialité de {name} →

Quel est le score de confiance de 51 ?

51 a un Score de Confiance Nerq de 50.6/100, obtenant la note D. Ce score est basé sur 1 dimensions mesurées indépendamment.

Conformité
100

Quels sont les résultats de sécurité clés pour 51 ?

Le signal le plus fort de 51 est conformité à 100/100. Aucune vulnérabilité connue n'a été détectée. N'a pas encore atteint le seuil vérifié Nerq de 70+.

Compliance: 100/100 — covers 52 of 52 jurisdictions

Qu'est-ce que 51 et qui le maintient ?

Auteurleimu
Catégorieuncategorized
Sourcehttps://huggingface.co/leimu/51
Protocolshuggingface_hub

Conformité réglementaire

EU AI Act Risk ClassNot assessed
Compliance Score100/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

What Is 51?

51 is a software tool in the uncategorized category available on huggingface_full. Nerq Trust Score: 51/100 (D).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.

How Nerq Assesses 51's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how 51 performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 50.6/100 (D) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Who Should Use 51?

51 is designed for:

Risk guidance: 51 is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.

How to Verify 51's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in 51's dependency tree.
  3. Avis permissions — Understand what access 51 requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run 51 in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=51
  6. Examiner le/la license — Confirm that 51's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with 51

When evaluating whether 51 is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how 51 processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check 51's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to 51. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If 51 connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that 51's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using 51 in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using 51 Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from 51 while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how 51 is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure 51 and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant 51 only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to 51's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how 51 is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid 51?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding 51 in these scenarios:

Le score de confiance de

For each scenario, evaluate whether 51 de 50.6/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How 51 Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among uncategorized tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. 51's score of 50.6/100 is below the category average of 62/100.

This suggests that 51 trails behind many comparable uncategorized tools. Organizations with strict security requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors 51 and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, 51's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track 51's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=51&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of 51 are strengthening or weakening over time.

Points Essentiels

Questions fréquentes

Est-ce que 51 sûr à utiliser?
Utiliser avec prudence. 51 a un Score de Confiance Nerq de 50.6/100 (D). Signal le plus fort : conformité (100/100). Score based on multiple trust dimensions.
Qu'est-ce que 51's trust score ?
51: 50.6/100 (D). Score based on: multiple trust dimensions. Compliance: 100/100. Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=51
Quelles sont les alternatives plus sûres à 51 ?
In the uncategorized category, more software tools are being analyzed — revenez bientôt. 51 scores 50.6/100.
How often is 51's safety score updated?
Nerq continuously monitors 51 and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Current: 50.6/100 (D), last verified 2026-04-01. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=51
Can I use 51 in a regulated environment?
51 has not reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Additional due diligence is recommended for regulated environments.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Disclaimer: Les scores de confiance Nerq sont des évaluations automatisées basées sur des signaux publiquement disponibles. Ce ne sont pas des recommandations ou des garanties. Effectuez toujours votre propre vérification.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Confidentialité Policy