Mcp Collaboration Agent est-il sûr ?
Mcp Collaboration Agent — Nerq Trust Score 53.2/100 (Note D). Score basé sur 5 independent trust signals.
Mcp Collaboration Agent est un software tool avec un Nerq Trust Score de 53.2/100 (D), basé sur 5 dimensions de données indépendantes. Sécurité: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularité: 0/100. Données de plusieurs sources publiques dont les registres de paquets, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev et OpenSSF Scorecard. Dernière mise à jour: n/a. Données lisibles par machine (JSON).
Mcp Collaboration Agent est-il sûr ?
Détail du score de confiance — Mcp Collaboration Agent has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.2/100 (D). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.
Quel est le score de confiance de Mcp Collaboration Agent ?
Mcp Collaboration Agent a un Score de Confiance Nerq de 53.2/100, obtenant la note D. Ce score est basé sur 5 dimensions mesurées indépendamment.
Quels sont les résultats de sécurité clés pour Mcp Collaboration Agent ?
Le signal le plus fort de Mcp Collaboration Agent est conformité à 100/100. Aucune vulnérabilité connue n'a été détectée.
Qu'est-ce que Mcp Collaboration Agent et qui le maintient ?
| Auteur | james0678 |
| Catégorie | Communication|Productivity |
| Source | https://github.com/james0678/mcp-collaboration-agent |
Conformité réglementaire
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Alternatives populaires dans communication|productivity
What Is Mcp Collaboration Agent?
Mcp Collaboration Agent is a software tool in the communication|productivity category: MCP-based LLM agent for team collaboration automation. Nerq Trust Score: 53/100 (D).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including sécurité vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license conformité, and adoption par la communauté.
How Nerq Assesses Mcp Collaboration Agent's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Mcp Collaboration Agent performs in each:
- Sécurité (0/100): Mcp Collaboration Agent's sécurité posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, sécurité policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Maintenance (1/100): Mcp Collaboration Agent is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (100/100): Mcp Collaboration Agent is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Basé sur GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 53.2/100 (D) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.
Who Typically Evaluates Mcp Collaboration Agent?
Mcp Collaboration Agent is commonly evaluated by:
- Developers and teams working with communication|productivity tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
How to read the signals: Mcp Collaboration Agent's measured signals (sécurité 0/100, maintenance 1/100, documentation 0/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.
How to Verify Mcp Collaboration Agent's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Examiner le/la repository's sécurité policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Mcp Collaboration Agent's dependency tree. - Avis permissions — Understand what access Mcp Collaboration Agent requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Mcp Collaboration Agent in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=mcp-collaboration-agent - Examiner le/la license — Confirm that Mcp Collaboration Agent's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses sécurité concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Mcp Collaboration Agent
When evaluating whether Mcp Collaboration Agent is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Mcp Collaboration Agent processes, stores, and transmits your data. Examiner le/la tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Mcp Collaboration Agent's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher sécurité risk.
Regularly check for updates to Mcp Collaboration Agent. Sécurité patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Mcp Collaboration Agent connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Mcp Collaboration Agent's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Mcp Collaboration Agent in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Mcp Collaboration Agent and the EU AI Act
Mcp Collaboration Agent is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's conformité assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal conformité.
Best Practices for Using Mcp Collaboration Agent Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Mcp Collaboration Agent while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Mcp Collaboration Agent is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and conformité with your sécurité policies.
Ensure Mcp Collaboration Agent and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from sécurité patches.
Grant Mcp Collaboration Agent only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Mcp Collaboration Agent's sécurité advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Mcp Collaboration Agent is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Mcp Collaboration Agent
Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Mcp Collaboration Agent's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:
- Environments handling sensitive or regulated data (healthcare, finance, government)
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
- Deployments with strict regulatory requirements that must be independently validated
For each situation, compare Mcp Collaboration Agent's measured trust score of 53.2/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Mcp Collaboration Agent is suitable for any particular use.
How Mcp Collaboration Agent Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among communication|productivity tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Mcp Collaboration Agent's score of 53.2/100 is near the category average of 62/100.
This places Mcp Collaboration Agent in line with the typical communication|productivity tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks modéré in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Mcp Collaboration Agent and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Mcp Collaboration Agent's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to sécurité and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Mcp Collaboration Agent's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=mcp-collaboration-agent&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — sécurité, maintenance, documentation, conformité, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Mcp Collaboration Agent are strengthening or weakening over time.
Mcp Collaboration Agent vs Alternatives
In the communication|productivity category, Mcp Collaboration Agent scores 53.2/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Mcp Collaboration Agent vs meeting-minutes — Trust Score: 64.1/100
- Mcp Collaboration Agent vs pocketpal-ai — Trust Score: 58.2/100
- Mcp Collaboration Agent vs olivia — Trust Score: 55.7/100
Points Essentiels
- Mcp Collaboration Agent has a measured Nerq Trust Score of 53.2/100 (D) — a composite of independent signals, not a suitability judgment.
- Among communication|productivity tools, Mcp Collaboration Agent scores near the category average of 62/100 (a positional measurement relative to peers).
- The individual signals — sécurité, maintenance, documentation, conformité, community — are shown above. Weigh them against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via Nerq's Preflight API.
Questions fréquentes
Mcp Collaboration Agent est-il sûr ?
Quel est le score de confiance de Mcp Collaboration Agent ?
Quelles sont les alternatives plus sûres à Mcp Collaboration Agent ?
À quelle fréquence le score de sécurité de Mcp Collaboration Agent est-il mis à jour ?
Puis-je utiliser Mcp Collaboration Agent dans un environnement réglementé ?
Voir aussi
Disclaimer: Les scores de confiance Nerq sont des évaluations automatisées basées sur des signaux publiquement disponibles. Ce ne sont pas des recommandations ou des garanties. Effectuez toujours votre propre vérification.