Restart Guard est-il sûr ?
Restart Guard — Nerq Trust Score 49.1/100 (Note D). Score basé sur 5 independent trust signals.
Restart Guard est un software tool avec un Nerq Trust Score de 49.1/100 (D), basé sur 5 dimensions de données indépendantes. Sécurité: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularité: 0/100. Données de plusieurs sources publiques dont les registres de paquets, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev et OpenSSF Scorecard. Dernière mise à jour: n/a. Données lisibles par machine (JSON).
Restart Guard est-il sûr ?
Détail du score de confiance — Restart Guard has a Nerq Trust Score of 49.1/100 (D). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.
Quel est le score de confiance de Restart Guard ?
Restart Guard a un Score de Confiance Nerq de 49.1/100, obtenant la note D. Ce score est basé sur 5 dimensions mesurées indépendamment.
Quels sont les résultats de sécurité clés pour Restart Guard ?
Le signal le plus fort de Restart Guard est conformité à 96/100. Aucune vulnérabilité connue n'a été détectée.
Qu'est-ce que Restart Guard et qui le maintient ?
| Auteur | Zjianru |
| Catégorie | Devops |
| Source | https://github.com/Zjianru/restart-guard |
| Frameworks | anthropic |
| Protocols | rest |
Conformité réglementaire
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 96/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Alternatives populaires dans devops
What Is Restart Guard?
Restart Guard is a DevOps tool: Safely restarts the Gateway with context and notifications.. Nerq Trust Score: 49/100 (D).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including sécurité vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license conformité, and adoption par la communauté.
How Nerq Assesses Restart Guard's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Restart Guard performs in each:
- Sécurité (0/100): Restart Guard's sécurité posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, sécurité policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Maintenance (1/100): Restart Guard is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (96/100): Restart Guard is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Basé sur GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 49.1/100 (D) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.
Who Typically Evaluates Restart Guard?
Restart Guard is commonly evaluated by:
- Developers and teams working with devops tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
How to read the signals: Restart Guard's measured signals (sécurité 0/100, maintenance 1/100, documentation 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.
How to Verify Restart Guard's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Examiner le/la repository's sécurité policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Restart Guard's dependency tree. - Avis permissions — Understand what access Restart Guard requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Restart Guard in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=restart-guard - Examiner le/la license — Confirm that Restart Guard's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses sécurité concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Restart Guard
When evaluating whether Restart Guard is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Restart Guard processes, stores, and transmits your data. Examiner le/la tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Restart Guard's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher sécurité risk.
Regularly check for updates to Restart Guard. Sécurité patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Restart Guard connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Restart Guard's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Restart Guard in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Restart Guard and the EU AI Act
Restart Guard is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's conformité assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal conformité.
Best Practices for Using Restart Guard Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Restart Guard while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Restart Guard is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and conformité with your sécurité policies.
Ensure Restart Guard and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from sécurité patches.
Grant Restart Guard only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Restart Guard's sécurité advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Restart Guard is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Restart Guard
Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Restart Guard's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:
- Environments handling sensitive or regulated data (healthcare, finance, government)
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
- Deployments with strict regulatory requirements that must be independently validated
For each situation, compare Restart Guard's measured trust score of 49.1/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Restart Guard is suitable for any particular use.
How Restart Guard Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among DevOps tools, the average Trust Score is 63/100. Restart Guard's score of 49.1/100 is below the category average of 63/100.
This suggests that Restart Guard trails behind many comparable DevOps tools. Organizations with strict sécurité requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks modéré in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Restart Guard and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Restart Guard's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to sécurité and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Restart Guard's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=restart-guard&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — sécurité, maintenance, documentation, conformité, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Restart Guard are strengthening or weakening over time.
Restart Guard vs Alternatives
In the devops category, Restart Guard scores 49.1/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Restart Guard vs ansible — Trust Score: 74.9/100
- Restart Guard vs Flowise — Trust Score: 67.5/100
- Restart Guard vs learn-claude-code — Trust Score: 72.1/100
Points Essentiels
- Restart Guard has a measured Nerq Trust Score of 49.1/100 (D) — a composite of independent signals, not a suitability judgment.
- Among DevOps tools, Restart Guard scores below the category average of 63/100 (a positional measurement relative to peers).
- The individual signals — sécurité, maintenance, documentation, conformité, community — are shown above. Weigh them against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via Nerq's Preflight API.
Questions fréquentes
Restart Guard est-il sûr ?
Quel est le score de confiance de Restart Guard ?
Quelles sont les alternatives plus sûres à Restart Guard ?
À quelle fréquence le score de sécurité de Restart Guard est-il mis à jour ?
Puis-je utiliser Restart Guard dans un environnement réglementé ?
Voir aussi
Disclaimer: Les scores de confiance Nerq sont des évaluations automatisées basées sur des signaux publiquement disponibles. Ce ne sont pas des recommandations ou des garanties. Effectuez toujours votre propre vérification.