क्या Codingagentbaseonopenhands सुरक्षित है?

Codingagentbaseonopenhands — Nerq Trust Score 46.3/100 (D ग्रेड). स्कोर आधारित 5 independent trust signals.

Codingagentbaseonopenhands एक software tool है Nerq विश्वास स्कोर के साथ 46.3/100 (D), based on 5 स्वतंत्र डेटा आयाम. सुरक्षा: 0/100. रखरखाव: 1/100. लोकप्रियता: 0/100. डेटा स्रोत: पैकेज रजिस्ट्री, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev और OpenSSF Scorecard सहित कई सार्वजनिक स्रोत. अंतिम अपडेट: n/a. मशीन पठनीय डेटा (JSON).

क्या Codingagentbaseonopenhands सुरक्षित है?

विश्वास स्कोर विवरण — Codingagentbaseonopenhands has a Nerq Trust Score of 46.3/100 (D). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.

सुरक्षा विश्लेषण → Codingagentbaseonopenhands गोपनीयता रिपोर्ट →

Codingagentbaseonopenhands का विश्वास स्कोर क्या है?

Codingagentbaseonopenhands का Nerq Trust Score 46.3/100 है, ग्रेड D। यह स्कोर सुरक्षा, रखरखाव और सामुदायिक अपनाने सहित 5 स्वतंत्र रूप से मापे गए आयामों पर आधारित है।

सुरक्षा
0
अनुपालन
87
रखरखाव
1
दस्तावेज़ीकरण
1
लोकप्रियता
0

Codingagentbaseonopenhands के प्रमुख सुरक्षा निष्कर्ष क्या हैं?

Codingagentbaseonopenhands का सबसे मजबूत संकेत अनुपालन है 87/100 पर। कोई ज्ञात भेद्यता नहीं पाई गई।

⚠सुरक्षा स्कोर: 0/100 (कमजोर)
⚠रखरखाव: 1/100 — कम रखरखाव गतिविधि
⚠अनुपालन: 87/100 — covers 45 of 52 jurisdictions
⚠दस्तावेज़ीकरण: 1/100 — सीमित प्रलेखन
⚠लोकप्रियता: 0/100 — सामुदायिक अपनाव

Codingagentbaseonopenhands क्या है और इसका रखरखाव कौन करता है?

डेवलपरtugintothenight
श्रेणीCoding
स्रोतhttps://github.com/tugintothenight/codingAgentBaseOnOpenhands
Protocolsrest

नियामक अनुपालन

EU AI Act Risk ClassMINIMAL
Compliance Score87/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

coding में लोकप्रिय विकल्प

Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT
65.3/100 · C
github
ollama/ollama
64.4/100 · C
github
langchain-ai/langchain
77.0/100 · B
github
x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools
64.4/100 · C
github
anomalyco/opencode
78.5/100 · B
github

What Is Codingagentbaseonopenhands?

Codingagentbaseonopenhands is a software tool in the coding category: A coding agent based on Openhands that generates code using LLM and runs Docker.. Nerq Trust Score: 46/100 (D).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including सुरक्षा vulnerabilities, रखरखाव activity, license अनुपालन, and सामुदायिक स्वीकृति.

How Nerq Assesses Codingagentbaseonopenhands's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five आयाम. Here is how Codingagentbaseonopenhands performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 46.3/100 (D) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates Codingagentbaseonopenhands?

Codingagentbaseonopenhands is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: Codingagentbaseonopenhands's measured signals (सुरक्षा 0/100, रखरखाव 1/100, दस्तावेज़ीकरण 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify Codingagentbaseonopenhands's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — जांचें repository's सुरक्षा policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active रखरखाव.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Codingagentbaseonopenhands's dependency tree.
  3. समीक्षा permissions — Understand what access Codingagentbaseonopenhands requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Codingagentbaseonopenhands in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=codingAgentBaseOnOpenhands
  6. जांचें license — Confirm that Codingagentbaseonopenhands's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses सुरक्षा concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Codingagentbaseonopenhands

When evaluating whether Codingagentbaseonopenhands is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Codingagentbaseonopenhands processes, stores, and transmits your data. जांचें tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency सुरक्षा

Check Codingagentbaseonopenhands's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher सुरक्षा risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Codingagentbaseonopenhands. सुरक्षा patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Codingagentbaseonopenhands connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP अनुपालन

Verify that Codingagentbaseonopenhands's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Codingagentbaseonopenhands in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Codingagentbaseonopenhands and the EU AI Act

Codingagentbaseonopenhands is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.

Nerq's अनुपालन assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal अनुपालन.

Best Practices for Using Codingagentbaseonopenhands Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Codingagentbaseonopenhands while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Codingagentbaseonopenhands is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and अनुपालन with your सुरक्षा policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Codingagentbaseonopenhands and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from सुरक्षा patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Codingagentbaseonopenhands only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for सुरक्षा advisories

Subscribe to Codingagentbaseonopenhands's सुरक्षा advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Codingagentbaseonopenhands is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Codingagentbaseonopenhands

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Codingagentbaseonopenhands's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare Codingagentbaseonopenhands's measured trust score of 46.3/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Codingagentbaseonopenhands is suitable for any particular use.

How Codingagentbaseonopenhands Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Codingagentbaseonopenhands's score of 46.3/100 is below the category average of 62/100.

This suggests that Codingagentbaseonopenhands trails behind many comparable coding tools. Organizations with strict सुरक्षा requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks मध्यम in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Codingagentbaseonopenhands and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or रखरखाव patterns change, Codingagentbaseonopenhands's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to सुरक्षा and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced रखरखाव, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Codingagentbaseonopenhands's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=codingAgentBaseOnOpenhands&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — सुरक्षा, रखरखाव, दस्तावेज़ीकरण, अनुपालन, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Codingagentbaseonopenhands are strengthening or weakening over time.

Codingagentbaseonopenhands vs विकल्प

In the coding category, Codingagentbaseonopenhands scores 46.3/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

मुख्य निष्कर्ष

अक्सर पूछे जाने वाले प्रश्न

क्या Codingagentbaseonopenhands सुरक्षित है?
codingAgentBaseOnOpenhands Nerq विश्वास स्कोर के साथ 46.3/100 (D). सबसे मजबूत संकेत: अनुपालन (87/100). स्कोर आधारित सुरक्षा (0/100), रखरखाव (1/100), लोकप्रियता (0/100), दस्तावेज़ीकरण (1/100).
Codingagentbaseonopenhands का विश्वास स्कोर क्या है?
codingAgentBaseOnOpenhands: 46.3/100 (D). स्कोर आधारित सुरक्षा (0/100), रखरखाव (1/100), लोकप्रियता (0/100), दस्तावेज़ीकरण (1/100). Compliance: 87/100. नया डेटा उपलब्ध होने पर स्कोर अपडेट होते हैं. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=codingAgentBaseOnOpenhands
Codingagentbaseonopenhands के अधिक सुरक्षित विकल्प क्या हैं?
Coding श्रेणी में, higher-rated alternatives include Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT (65/100), ollama/ollama (64/100), langchain-ai/langchain (77/100). codingAgentBaseOnOpenhands scores 46.3/100.
Codingagentbaseonopenhands का सुरक्षा स्कोर कितनी बार अपडेट होता है?
Nerq recomputes Codingagentbaseonopenhands's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 46.3/100 (D). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=codingAgentBaseOnOpenhands
क्या मैं विनियमित वातावरण में Codingagentbaseonopenhands उपयोग कर सकता हूँ?
Codingagentbaseonopenhands: 46.3/100 (D). Compliance: 45 of 52 jurisdictions. EU AI Act compliant. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

यह भी देखें

Disclaimer: Nerq विश्वास स्कोर सार्वजनिक रूप से उपलब्ध संकेतों पर आधारित स्वचालित मूल्यांकन हैं। ये सिफारिश या गारंटी नहीं हैं। हमेशा अपना स्वयं का सत्यापन करें।

हम विश्लेषण और कैशिंग के लिए कुकीज़ का उपयोग करते हैं। गोपनीयता