Apakah Openclaw Openclaw Aman?
Openclaw Openclaw — Nerq Trust Score 72.6/100 (Nilai B). Skor berdasarkan 5 independent trust signals.
Openclaw Openclaw adalah software tool dengan Skor Kepercayaan Nerq sebesar 72.6/100 (B), based on 5 dimensi data independen. Keamanan: 0/100. Pemeliharaan: 1/100. Popularitas: 0/100. Data bersumber dari berbagai sumber publik termasuk registri paket, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, dan OpenSSF Scorecard. Terakhir diperbarui: n/a. Data yang dapat dibaca mesin (JSON).
Apakah Openclaw Openclaw Aman?
Rincian Skor Kepercayaan — Openclaw Openclaw has a Nerq Trust Score of 72.6/100 (B). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.
Berapa skor kepercayaan Openclaw Openclaw?
Openclaw Openclaw memiliki Skor Kepercayaan Nerq 72.6/100 dengan nilai B. Skor ini didasarkan pada 5 dimensi yang diukur secara independen.
Apa temuan keamanan utama untuk Openclaw Openclaw?
Sinyal terkuat Openclaw Openclaw adalah kepatuhan pada 84/100. Tidak ada kerentanan yang diketahui terdeteksi.
Apa itu Openclaw Openclaw dan siapa yang mengelolanya?
| Pembuat | harveyzhang |
| Kategori | Personal Assistant |
| Sumber | https://github.com/harveyzhang/openclaw-openclaw |
Kepatuhan Regulasi
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 84/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Alternatif Populer di personal_assistant
What Is Openclaw Openclaw?
Openclaw Openclaw is a software tool in the personal_assistant category: Your own personal AI assistant.. Nerq Trust Score: 73/100 (B).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including keamanan vulnerabilities, pemeliharaan activity, license kepatuhan, and adopsi komunitas.
How Nerq Assesses Openclaw Openclaw's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensi. Here is how Openclaw Openclaw performs in each:
- Keamanan (0/100): Openclaw Openclaw's keamanan posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, keamanan policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Pemeliharaan (1/100): Openclaw Openclaw is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API dokumentasi, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (84/100): Openclaw Openclaw is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Berdasarkan GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 72.6/100 (B) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.
Who Typically Evaluates Openclaw Openclaw?
Openclaw Openclaw is commonly evaluated by:
- Developers and teams working with personal_assistant tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
How to read the signals: Openclaw Openclaw's measured signals (keamanan 0/100, pemeliharaan 1/100, dokumentasi 0/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.
How to Verify Openclaw Openclaw's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Tinjau repository's keamanan policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active pemeliharaan.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Openclaw Openclaw's dependency tree. - Ulasan permissions — Understand what access Openclaw Openclaw requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Openclaw Openclaw in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=openclaw-openclaw - Tinjau license — Confirm that Openclaw Openclaw's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses keamanan concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Openclaw Openclaw
When evaluating whether Openclaw Openclaw is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Openclaw Openclaw processes, stores, and transmits your data. Tinjau tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Openclaw Openclaw's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher keamanan risk.
Regularly check for updates to Openclaw Openclaw. Keamanan patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Openclaw Openclaw connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Openclaw Openclaw's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Openclaw Openclaw in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Openclaw Openclaw and the EU AI Act
Openclaw Openclaw is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's kepatuhan assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal kepatuhan.
Best Practices for Using Openclaw Openclaw Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Openclaw Openclaw while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Openclaw Openclaw is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and kepatuhan with your keamanan policies.
Ensure Openclaw Openclaw and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from keamanan patches.
Grant Openclaw Openclaw only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Openclaw Openclaw's keamanan advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Openclaw Openclaw is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Openclaw Openclaw
Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Openclaw Openclaw's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:
- Environments handling sensitive or regulated data (healthcare, finance, government)
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
- Deployments with strict regulatory requirements that must be independently validated
For each situation, compare Openclaw Openclaw's measured trust score of 72.6/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Openclaw Openclaw is suitable for any particular use.
How Openclaw Openclaw Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among personal_assistant tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Openclaw Openclaw's score of 72.6/100 is significantly above the category average of 62/100.
This places Openclaw Openclaw in the top tier of personal_assistant tools that Nerq tracks. Tools scoring this far above average typically demonstrate mature keamanan practices, consistent release cadence, and broad adopsi komunitas.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks sedang in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Openclaw Openclaw and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or pemeliharaan patterns change, Openclaw Openclaw's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to keamanan and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced pemeliharaan, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Openclaw Openclaw's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=openclaw-openclaw&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — keamanan, pemeliharaan, dokumentasi, kepatuhan, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Openclaw Openclaw are strengthening or weakening over time.
Openclaw Openclaw vs Alternatif
In the personal_assistant category, Openclaw Openclaw scores 72.6/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Openclaw Openclaw vs MIRIX — Trust Score: 75.1/100
- Openclaw Openclaw vs OwnPilot — Trust Score: 58.1/100
- Openclaw Openclaw vs miniclawd — Trust Score: 57.7/100
Kesimpulan Utama
- Openclaw Openclaw has a measured Nerq Trust Score of 72.6/100 (B) — a composite of independent signals, not a suitability judgment.
- Among personal_assistant tools, Openclaw Openclaw scores significantly above the category average of 62/100 (a positional measurement relative to peers).
- The individual signals — keamanan, pemeliharaan, dokumentasi, kepatuhan, community — are shown above. Weigh them against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via Nerq's Preflight API.
Pertanyaan yang Sering Diajukan
Apakah Openclaw Openclaw Aman?
Berapa skor kepercayaan Openclaw Openclaw?
Apa alternatif yang lebih aman dari Openclaw Openclaw?
Seberapa sering skor keamanan Openclaw Openclaw diperbarui?
Bisakah saya menggunakan Openclaw Openclaw di lingkungan yang diatur?
Lihat juga
Disclaimer: Skor kepercayaan Nerq adalah penilaian otomatis berdasarkan sinyal yang tersedia secara publik. Ini bukan rekomendasi atau jaminan. Selalu lakukan verifikasi mandiri Anda sendiri.