Is Agent Data Parser veilig?

Agent Data Parser — Nerq Trust Score 66.0/100 (C-beoordeling). Score gebaseerd op 5 independent trust signals.

Agent Data Parser is een software tool met een Nerq Vertrouwensscore van 66.0/100 (C), based on 5 onafhankelijke gegevensdimensies. Beveiliging: 0/100. Onderhoud: 1/100. Populariteit: 0/100. Gegevens afkomstig van meerdere openbare bronnen waaronder pakketregisters, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev en OpenSSF Scorecard. Laatst bijgewerkt: n/a. Machineleesbare gegevens (JSON).

Is Agent Data Parser veilig?

Vertrouwensscore details — Agent Data Parser has a Nerq Trust Score of 66.0/100 (C). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.

Beveiligingsanalyse → Agent Data Parser Privacyrapport →

Wat is de vertrouwensscore van Agent Data Parser?

Agent Data Parser heeft een Nerq Trust Score van 66.0/100 met het cijfer C. Deze score is gebaseerd op 5 onafhankelijk gemeten dimensies, waaronder beveiliging, onderhoud en community-adoptie.

Beveiliging
0
Naleving
100
Onderhoud
1
Documentatie
1
Populariteit
0

Wat zijn de belangrijkste beveiligingsbevindingen voor Agent Data Parser?

Het sterkste signaal van Agent Data Parser is naleving met 100/100. Er zijn geen bekende kwetsbaarheden gedetecteerd.

⚠Beveiligingsscore: 0/100 (zwak)
⚠Onderhoud: 1/100 — lage onderhoudsactiviteit
⚠Naleving: 100/100 — covers 52 of 52 jurisdicties
⚠Documentatie: 1/100 — beperkte documentatie
⚠Populariteit: 0/100 — gemeenschapsacceptatie

Wat is Agent Data Parser en wie onderhoudt het?

Ontwikkelaarbd-makers
CategorieData
Bronhttps://github.com/bd-makers/agent-data-parser
Protocolsrest

Naleving van regelgeving

EU AI Act Risk ClassMINIMAL
Compliance Score100/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdicties

Populaire alternatieven in data

firecrawl/firecrawl
64.4/100 · C
github
MinerU
76.6/100 · B
github
mindsdb/mindsdb
68.1/100 · C
github
PostHog
48.9/100 · D
pulsemcp
Graphiti
48.9/100 · D
pulsemcp

What Is Agent Data Parser?

Agent Data Parser is a software tool in the data category: Message parser library for React Native and Web. Nerq Trust Score: 66/100 (C).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including beveiliging vulnerabilities, onderhoud activity, license naleving, and gemeenschapsacceptatie.

How Nerq Assesses Agent Data Parser's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensies. Here is how Agent Data Parser performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 66.0/100 (C) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates Agent Data Parser?

Agent Data Parser is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: Agent Data Parser's measured signals (beveiliging 0/100, onderhoud 1/100, documentatie 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify Agent Data Parser's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Bekijk de repository's beveiliging policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active onderhoud.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Agent Data Parser's dependency tree.
  3. Beoordeling permissions — Understand what access Agent Data Parser requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Agent Data Parser in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=agent-data-parser
  6. Bekijk de license — Confirm that Agent Data Parser's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses beveiliging concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Agent Data Parser

When evaluating whether Agent Data Parser is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Agent Data Parser processes, stores, and transmits your data. Bekijk de tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency beveiliging

Check Agent Data Parser's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher beveiliging risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Agent Data Parser. Beveiliging patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Agent Data Parser connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP naleving

Verify that Agent Data Parser's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Agent Data Parser in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Agent Data Parser and the EU AI Act

Agent Data Parser is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.

Nerq's naleving assessment covers 52 jurisdicties worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal naleving.

Best Practices for Using Agent Data Parser Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Agent Data Parser while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Agent Data Parser is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and naleving with your beveiliging policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Agent Data Parser and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from beveiliging patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Agent Data Parser only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for beveiliging advisories

Subscribe to Agent Data Parser's beveiliging advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Agent Data Parser is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Agent Data Parser

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Agent Data Parser's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare Agent Data Parser's measured trust score of 66.0/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Agent Data Parser is suitable for any particular use.

How Agent Data Parser Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among data tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Agent Data Parser's score of 66.0/100 is above the category average of 62/100.

This positions Agent Data Parser favorably among data tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensies.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks matig in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Agent Data Parser and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or onderhoud patterns change, Agent Data Parser's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to beveiliging and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced onderhoud, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Agent Data Parser's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=agent-data-parser&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — beveiliging, onderhoud, documentatie, naleving, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Agent Data Parser are strengthening or weakening over time.

Agent Data Parser vs Alternatieven

In the data category, Agent Data Parser scores 66.0/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Belangrijkste conclusies

Veelgestelde vragen

Is Agent Data Parser veilig?
agent-data-parser met een Nerq Vertrouwensscore van 66.0/100 (C). Sterkste signaal: naleving (100/100). Score gebaseerd op Beveiliging (0/100), Onderhoud (1/100), Populariteit (0/100), Documentatie (1/100).
Wat is de vertrouwensscore van Agent Data Parser?
agent-data-parser: 66.0/100 (C). Score gebaseerd op Beveiliging (0/100), Onderhoud (1/100), Populariteit (0/100), Documentatie (1/100). Compliance: 100/100. Scores worden bijgewerkt wanneer nieuwe data beschikbaar komen. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=agent-data-parser
Wat zijn veiligere alternatieven voor Agent Data Parser?
In de categorie Data, higher-rated alternatives include firecrawl/firecrawl (64/100), MinerU (77/100), mindsdb/mindsdb (68/100). agent-data-parser scores 66.0/100.
Hoe vaak wordt de beveiligingsscore van Agent Data Parser bijgewerkt?
Nerq recomputes Agent Data Parser's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 66.0/100 (C). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=agent-data-parser
Kan ik Agent Data Parser gebruiken in een gereguleerde omgeving?
Agent Data Parser: 66.0/100 (C). Compliance: 52 of 52 jurisdicties. EU AI Act compliant. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Zie ook

Disclaimer: Nerq-vertrouwensscores zijn geautomatiseerde beoordelingen op basis van openbaar beschikbare signalen. Ze vormen geen aanbeveling of garantie. Voer altijd uw eigen verificatie uit.

We gebruiken cookies voor analyse en caching. Privacy