Is Ai Task Tracker veilig?
Ai Task Tracker — Nerq Vertrouwensscore 60.1/100 (C-beoordeling). Op basis van analyse van 5 vertrouwensdimensies wordt het beschouwd als over het algemeen veilig maar met enkele zorgen. Laatst bijgewerkt: 2026-04-02.
Gebruik Ai Task Tracker met voorzichtigheid. Ai Task Tracker is a software tool met een Nerq Vertrouwensscore van 60.1/100 (C), based on 5 onafhankelijke gegevensdimensies. Het ligt onder de aanbevolen drempel van 70. Beveiliging: 0/100. Onderhoud: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. Gegevens afkomstig van multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Laatst bijgewerkt: 2026-04-02. Machineleesbare gegevens (JSON).
Is Ai Task Tracker veilig?
VOORZICHTIGHEID — Ai Task Tracker heeft een Nerq Vertrouwensscore van 60.1/100 (C). Het heeft gematigde vertrouwenssignalen maar toont enkele aandachtspunten. Geschikt voor ontwikkelingsgebruik — controleer beveiligings- en onderhoudssignalen vóór productie-implementatie.
Wat is de vertrouwensscore van Ai Task Tracker?
Ai Task Tracker heeft een Nerq Vertrouwensscore van 60.1/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensies including beveiliging, onderhoud, and gemeenschapsacceptatie.
Wat zijn de belangrijkste beveiligingsbevindingen voor Ai Task Tracker?
Ai Task Tracker's strongest signal is naleving at 100/100. No bekende kwetsbaarheden have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
Wat is Ai Task Tracker en wie onderhoudt het?
| Ontwikkelaar | smilenccc |
| Categorie | coding |
| Bron | https://github.com/smilenccc/ai-task-tracker |
Naleving van regelgeving
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Populaire alternatieven in coding
What Is Ai Task Tracker?
Ai Task Tracker is a software tool in the coding category: AI任务追踪系统,自动记录并同步Telegram任务到网站。. Nerq Vertrouwensscore: 60/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including beveiliging vulnerabilities, onderhoud activity, license naleving, and gemeenschapsacceptatie.
How Nerq Assesses Ai Task Tracker's Safety
Nerq's Vertrouwensscore is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensies. Here is how Ai Task Tracker performs in each:
- Beveiliging (0/100): Ai Task Tracker's beveiliging posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, beveiliging policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Onderhoud (1/100): Ai Task Tracker is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentatie, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (100/100): Ai Task Tracker is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Gebaseerd op GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Vertrouwensscore of 60.1/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Ai Task Tracker?
Ai Task Tracker is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with coding tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Ai Task Tracker is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its beveiliging posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Ai Task Tracker's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Bekijk de repository's beveiliging policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active onderhoud.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for bekende kwetsbaarheden in Ai Task Tracker's dependency tree. - Beoordeling permissions — Understand what access Ai Task Tracker requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Ai Task Tracker in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=ai-task-tracker - Bekijk de license — Confirm that Ai Task Tracker's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses beveiliging concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Ai Task Tracker
When evaluating whether Ai Task Tracker is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Ai Task Tracker processes, stores, and transmits your data. Bekijk de tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Ai Task Tracker's dependency tree for bekende kwetsbaarheden. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher beveiliging risk.
Regularly check for updates to Ai Task Tracker. Beveiliging patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Ai Task Tracker connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Ai Task Tracker's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Ai Task Tracker in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Ai Task Tracker and the EU AI Act
Ai Task Tracker is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's naleving assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal naleving.
Best Practices for Using Ai Task Tracker Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Ai Task Tracker while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Ai Task Tracker is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and naleving with your beveiliging policies.
Ensure Ai Task Tracker and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from beveiliging patches.
Grant Ai Task Tracker only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Ai Task Tracker's beveiliging advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Ai Task Tracker is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Ai Task Tracker?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Ai Task Tracker in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional naleving review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Ai Task Tracker is 60.1/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual beveiliging assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Ai Task Tracker Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Vertrouwensscore is 62/100. Ai Task Tracker's score of 60.1/100 is near the category average of 62/100.
This places Ai Task Tracker in line with the typical coding tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks matig in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Vertrouwensscore History
Nerq continuously monitors Ai Task Tracker and recalculates its Vertrouwensscore as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or onderhoud patterns change, Ai Task Tracker's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to beveiliging and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced onderhoud, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Ai Task Tracker's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=ai-task-tracker&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — beveiliging, onderhoud, documentatie, naleving, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Ai Task Tracker are strengthening or weakening over time.
Ai Task Tracker vs Alternatieven
In the coding category, Ai Task Tracker scores 60.1/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Ai Task Tracker vs AutoGPT — Vertrouwensscore: 74.7/100
- Ai Task Tracker vs ollama — Vertrouwensscore: 73.8/100
- Ai Task Tracker vs langchain — Vertrouwensscore: 86.4/100
Belangrijkste conclusies
- Ai Task Tracker has a Vertrouwensscore of 60.1/100 (C) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Ai Task Tracker shows matig trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among coding tools, Ai Task Tracker scores near the category average of 62/100, suggesting room for improvement relative to peers.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Veelgestelde vragen
Is Ai Task Tracker veilig om te gebruiken?
Wat is Ai Task Tracker's trust score?
Wat zijn veiligere alternatieven voor Ai Task Tracker?
How often is Ai Task Tracker's safety score updated?
Kan ik Ai Task Tracker gebruiken in een gereguleerde omgeving?
Disclaimer: Nerq-vertrouwensscores zijn geautomatiseerde beoordelingen op basis van openbaar beschikbare signalen. Ze vormen geen aanbeveling of garantie. Voer altijd uw eigen verificatie uit.