Is Openclaw Kubernetes veilig?

Openclaw Kubernetes — Nerq Trust Score 62.0/100 (C-beoordeling). Score gebaseerd op 5 independent trust signals.

Openclaw Kubernetes is een software tool met een Nerq Vertrouwensscore van 62.0/100 (C), based on 5 onafhankelijke gegevensdimensies. Beveiliging: 0/100. Onderhoud: 1/100. Populariteit: 0/100. Gegevens afkomstig van meerdere openbare bronnen waaronder pakketregisters, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev en OpenSSF Scorecard. Laatst bijgewerkt: n/a. Machineleesbare gegevens (JSON).

Is Openclaw Kubernetes veilig?

Vertrouwensscore details — Openclaw Kubernetes has a Nerq Trust Score of 62.0/100 (C). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.

Beveiligingsanalyse → Openclaw Kubernetes Privacyrapport →

Wat is de vertrouwensscore van Openclaw Kubernetes?

Openclaw Kubernetes heeft een Nerq Trust Score van 62.0/100 met het cijfer C. Deze score is gebaseerd op 5 onafhankelijk gemeten dimensies, waaronder beveiliging, onderhoud en community-adoptie.

Beveiliging
0
Naleving
84
Onderhoud
1
Documentatie
1
Populariteit
0

Wat zijn de belangrijkste beveiligingsbevindingen voor Openclaw Kubernetes?

Het sterkste signaal van Openclaw Kubernetes is naleving met 84/100. Er zijn geen bekende kwetsbaarheden gedetecteerd.

⚠Beveiligingsscore: 0/100 (zwak)
⚠Onderhoud: 1/100 — lage onderhoudsactiviteit
⚠Naleving: 84/100 — covers 43 of 52 jurisdicties
⚠Documentatie: 1/100 — beperkte documentatie
⚠Populariteit: 0/100 — 9 sterren op github

Wat is Openclaw Kubernetes en wie onderhoudt het?

Ontwikkelaarfeiskyer
CategorieDevops
Sterren9
Bronhttps://github.com/feiskyer/openclaw-kubernetes
Frameworksopenai · anthropic
Protocolsrest

Naleving van regelgeving

EU AI Act Risk ClassMINIMAL
Compliance Score84/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdicties

Populaire alternatieven in devops

ansible/ansible
74.9/100 · B
github
FlowiseAI/Flowise
67.5/100 · C
github
shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code
72.1/100 · B
github
continuedev/continue
75.0/100 · B
github
wshobson/agents
79.3/100 · B
github

What Is Openclaw Kubernetes?

Openclaw Kubernetes is a DevOps tool: Helm chart for deploying OpenClaw, an AI assistant on Kubernetes.. It has 9 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 62/100 (C).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including beveiliging vulnerabilities, onderhoud activity, license naleving, and gemeenschapsacceptatie.

How Nerq Assesses Openclaw Kubernetes's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensies. Here is how Openclaw Kubernetes performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 62.0/100 (C) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates Openclaw Kubernetes?

Openclaw Kubernetes is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: Openclaw Kubernetes's measured signals (beveiliging 0/100, onderhoud 1/100, documentatie 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify Openclaw Kubernetes's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Bekijk de repository's beveiliging policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active onderhoud.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Openclaw Kubernetes's dependency tree.
  3. Beoordeling permissions — Understand what access Openclaw Kubernetes requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Openclaw Kubernetes in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=openclaw-kubernetes
  6. Bekijk de license — Confirm that Openclaw Kubernetes's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses beveiliging concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Openclaw Kubernetes

When evaluating whether Openclaw Kubernetes is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Openclaw Kubernetes processes, stores, and transmits your data. Bekijk de tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency beveiliging

Check Openclaw Kubernetes's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher beveiliging risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Openclaw Kubernetes. Beveiliging patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Openclaw Kubernetes connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP naleving

Verify that Openclaw Kubernetes's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Openclaw Kubernetes in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Openclaw Kubernetes and the EU AI Act

Openclaw Kubernetes is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.

Nerq's naleving assessment covers 52 jurisdicties worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal naleving.

Best Practices for Using Openclaw Kubernetes Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Openclaw Kubernetes while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Openclaw Kubernetes is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and naleving with your beveiliging policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Openclaw Kubernetes and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from beveiliging patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Openclaw Kubernetes only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for beveiliging advisories

Subscribe to Openclaw Kubernetes's beveiliging advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Openclaw Kubernetes is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Openclaw Kubernetes

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Openclaw Kubernetes's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare Openclaw Kubernetes's measured trust score of 62.0/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Openclaw Kubernetes is suitable for any particular use.

How Openclaw Kubernetes Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among DevOps tools, the average Trust Score is 63/100. Openclaw Kubernetes's score of 62.0/100 is near the category average of 63/100.

This places Openclaw Kubernetes in line with the typical DevOps tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks matig in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Openclaw Kubernetes and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or onderhoud patterns change, Openclaw Kubernetes's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to beveiliging and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced onderhoud, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Openclaw Kubernetes's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=openclaw-kubernetes&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — beveiliging, onderhoud, documentatie, naleving, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Openclaw Kubernetes are strengthening or weakening over time.

Openclaw Kubernetes vs Alternatieven

In the devops category, Openclaw Kubernetes scores 62.0/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Belangrijkste conclusies

Veelgestelde vragen

Is Openclaw Kubernetes veilig?
openclaw-kubernetes met een Nerq Vertrouwensscore van 62.0/100 (C). Sterkste signaal: naleving (84/100). Score gebaseerd op Beveiliging (0/100), Onderhoud (1/100), Populariteit (0/100), Documentatie (1/100).
Wat is de vertrouwensscore van Openclaw Kubernetes?
openclaw-kubernetes: 62.0/100 (C). Score gebaseerd op Beveiliging (0/100), Onderhoud (1/100), Populariteit (0/100), Documentatie (1/100). Compliance: 84/100. Scores worden bijgewerkt wanneer nieuwe data beschikbaar komen. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=openclaw-kubernetes
Wat zijn veiligere alternatieven voor Openclaw Kubernetes?
In de categorie Devops, higher-rated alternatives include ansible/ansible (75/100), FlowiseAI/Flowise (68/100), shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code (72/100). openclaw-kubernetes scores 62.0/100.
Hoe vaak wordt de beveiligingsscore van Openclaw Kubernetes bijgewerkt?
Nerq recomputes Openclaw Kubernetes's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 62.0/100 (C). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=openclaw-kubernetes
Kan ik Openclaw Kubernetes gebruiken in een gereguleerde omgeving?
Openclaw Kubernetes: 62.0/100 (C). Compliance: 43 of 52 jurisdicties. EU AI Act compliant. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Zie ook

Disclaimer: Nerq-vertrouwensscores zijn geautomatiseerde beoordelingen op basis van openbaar beschikbare signalen. Ze vormen geen aanbeveling of garantie. Voer altijd uw eigen verificatie uit.

We gebruiken cookies voor analyse en caching. Privacy