Is Opencode Agent Conversations veilig?

Opencode Agent Conversations — Nerq Trust Score 64.5/100 (C-beoordeling). Score gebaseerd op 5 independent trust signals.

Opencode Agent Conversations is een software tool met een Nerq Vertrouwensscore van 64.5/100 (C), based on 5 onafhankelijke gegevensdimensies. Beveiliging: 0/100. Onderhoud: 1/100. Populariteit: 0/100. Gegevens afkomstig van meerdere openbare bronnen waaronder pakketregisters, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev en OpenSSF Scorecard. Laatst bijgewerkt: n/a. Machineleesbare gegevens (JSON).

Is Opencode Agent Conversations veilig?

Vertrouwensscore details — Opencode Agent Conversations has a Nerq Trust Score of 64.5/100 (C). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.

Beveiligingsanalyse → Opencode Agent Conversations Privacyrapport →

Wat is de vertrouwensscore van Opencode Agent Conversations?

Opencode Agent Conversations heeft een Nerq Trust Score van 64.5/100 met het cijfer C. Deze score is gebaseerd op 5 onafhankelijk gemeten dimensies, waaronder beveiliging, onderhoud en community-adoptie.

Beveiliging
0
Naleving
100
Onderhoud
1
Documentatie
1
Populariteit
0

Wat zijn de belangrijkste beveiligingsbevindingen voor Opencode Agent Conversations?

Het sterkste signaal van Opencode Agent Conversations is naleving met 100/100. Er zijn geen bekende kwetsbaarheden gedetecteerd.

Beveiligingsscore: 0/100 (zwak)
Onderhoud: 1/100 — lage onderhoudsactiviteit
Naleving: 100/100 — covers 52 of 52 jurisdicties
Documentatie: 1/100 — beperkte documentatie
Populariteit: 0/100 — 2 sterren op github

Wat is Opencode Agent Conversations en wie onderhoudt het?

Ontwikkelaarmarcel-tuinstra
CategorieCommunication
Sterren2
Bronhttps://github.com/marcel-tuinstra/opencode-agent-conversations
Protocolsmcp

Naleving van regelgeving

EU AI Act Risk ClassMINIMAL
Compliance Score100/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdicties

Populaire alternatieven in communication

lencx/ChatGPT
59.4/100 · D
github
janhq/jan
64.4/100 · C
github
2noise/ChatTTS
55.0/100 · C
github
chatboxai/chatbox
55.9/100 · C
github
LAION-AI/Open-Assistant
67.9/100 · B-
github

What Is Opencode Agent Conversations?

Opencode Agent Conversations is a software tool in the communication category: Community plugin for OpenCode to run and orchestrate multi-agent conversations.. It has 2 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 64/100 (C).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including beveiliging vulnerabilities, onderhoud activity, license naleving, and gemeenschapsacceptatie.

How Nerq Assesses Opencode Agent Conversations's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensies. Here is how Opencode Agent Conversations performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 64.5/100 (C) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates Opencode Agent Conversations?

Opencode Agent Conversations is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: Opencode Agent Conversations's measured signals (beveiliging 0/100, onderhoud 1/100, documentatie 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify Opencode Agent Conversations's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Bekijk de repository's beveiliging policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active onderhoud.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Opencode Agent Conversations's dependency tree.
  3. Beoordeling permissions — Understand what access Opencode Agent Conversations requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Opencode Agent Conversations in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=opencode-agent-conversations
  6. Bekijk de license — Confirm that Opencode Agent Conversations's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses beveiliging concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Opencode Agent Conversations

When evaluating whether Opencode Agent Conversations is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Opencode Agent Conversations processes, stores, and transmits your data. Bekijk de tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency beveiliging

Check Opencode Agent Conversations's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher beveiliging risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Opencode Agent Conversations. Beveiliging patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Opencode Agent Conversations connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP naleving

Verify that Opencode Agent Conversations's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Opencode Agent Conversations in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Opencode Agent Conversations and the EU AI Act

Opencode Agent Conversations is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.

Nerq's naleving assessment covers 52 jurisdicties worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal naleving.

Best Practices for Using Opencode Agent Conversations Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Opencode Agent Conversations while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Opencode Agent Conversations is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and naleving with your beveiliging policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Opencode Agent Conversations and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from beveiliging patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Opencode Agent Conversations only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for beveiliging advisories

Subscribe to Opencode Agent Conversations's beveiliging advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Opencode Agent Conversations is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Opencode Agent Conversations

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Opencode Agent Conversations's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare Opencode Agent Conversations's measured trust score of 64.5/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Opencode Agent Conversations is suitable for any particular use.

How Opencode Agent Conversations Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among communication tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Opencode Agent Conversations's score of 64.5/100 is above the category average of 62/100.

This positions Opencode Agent Conversations favorably among communication tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensies.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks matig in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Opencode Agent Conversations and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or onderhoud patterns change, Opencode Agent Conversations's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to beveiliging and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced onderhoud, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Opencode Agent Conversations's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=opencode-agent-conversations&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — beveiliging, onderhoud, documentatie, naleving, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Opencode Agent Conversations are strengthening or weakening over time.

Opencode Agent Conversations vs Alternatieven

In the communication category, Opencode Agent Conversations scores 64.5/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Belangrijkste conclusies

Veelgestelde vragen

Is Opencode Agent Conversations veilig?
opencode-agent-conversations met een Nerq Vertrouwensscore van 64.5/100 (C). Sterkste signaal: naleving (100/100). Score gebaseerd op Beveiliging (0/100), Onderhoud (1/100), Populariteit (0/100), Documentatie (1/100).
Wat is de vertrouwensscore van Opencode Agent Conversations?
opencode-agent-conversations: 64.5/100 (C). Score gebaseerd op Beveiliging (0/100), Onderhoud (1/100), Populariteit (0/100), Documentatie (1/100). Compliance: 100/100. Scores worden bijgewerkt wanneer nieuwe data beschikbaar komen. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=opencode-agent-conversations
Wat zijn veiligere alternatieven voor Opencode Agent Conversations?
In de categorie Communication, higher-rated alternatives include lencx/ChatGPT (59/100), janhq/jan (64/100), 2noise/ChatTTS (55/100). opencode-agent-conversations scores 64.5/100.
Hoe vaak wordt de beveiligingsscore van Opencode Agent Conversations bijgewerkt?
Nerq recomputes Opencode Agent Conversations's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 64.5/100 (C). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=opencode-agent-conversations
Kan ik Opencode Agent Conversations gebruiken in een gereguleerde omgeving?
Opencode Agent Conversations: 64.5/100 (C). Compliance: 52 of 52 jurisdicties. EU AI Act compliant. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Zie ook

Disclaimer: Nerq-vertrouwensscores zijn geautomatiseerde beoordelingen op basis van openbaar beschikbare signalen. Ze vormen geen aanbeveling of garantie. Voer altijd uw eigen verificatie uit.

We gebruiken cookies voor analyse en caching. Privacy