Is Stable Video Diffusion veilig?
Stable Video Diffusion — Nerq Trust Score 62.4/100 (C-beoordeling). Op basis van analyse van 4 vertrouwensdimensies wordt het beschouwd als over het algemeen veilig maar met enkele zorgen. Laatst bijgewerkt: 2026-04-07.
Gebruik Stable Video Diffusion met voorzichtigheid. Stable Video Diffusion is een software tool (multimodalart/stable-video-diffusion) met een Nerq Vertrouwensscore van 62.4/100 (C), based on 4 onafhankelijke gegevensdimensies. Onder de geverifieerde drempel van Nerq Onderhoud: 0/100. Populariteit: 1/100. Gegevens afkomstig van meerdere openbare bronnen waaronder pakketregisters, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev en OpenSSF Scorecard. Laatst bijgewerkt: 2026-04-07. Machineleesbare gegevens (JSON).
Is Stable Video Diffusion veilig?
CAUTION — Stable Video Diffusion has a Nerq Trust Score of 62.4/100 (C). Heeft matige vertrouwenssignalen maar toont enkele aandachtspunten that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review beveiliging and onderhoud signals before production deployment.
Wat is de vertrouwensscore van Stable Video Diffusion?
Stable Video Diffusion heeft een Nerq Trust Score van 62.4/100 met het cijfer C. Deze score is gebaseerd op 4 onafhankelijk gemeten dimensies, waaronder beveiliging, onderhoud en community-adoptie.
Wat zijn de belangrijkste beveiligingsbevindingen voor Stable Video Diffusion?
Het sterkste signaal van Stable Video Diffusion is naleving met 82/100. Er zijn geen bekende kwetsbaarheden gedetecteerd. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
Wat is Stable Video Diffusion en wie onderhoudt het?
| Ontwikkelaar | multimodalart |
| Categorie | Infrastructure |
| Sterren | 2,005 |
| Bron | https://huggingface.co/spaces/multimodalart/stable-video-diffusion |
| Protocols | huggingface_api |
Naleving van regelgeving
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 82/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdicties |
Populaire alternatieven in infrastructure
What Is Stable Video Diffusion?
Stable Video Diffusion is a software tool in the infrastructure category: multimodalart/stable-video-diffusion. It has 2,005 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 62/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including beveiliging vulnerabilities, onderhoud activity, license naleving, and gemeenschapsacceptatie.
How Nerq Assesses Stable Video Diffusion's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensies. Here is how Stable Video Diffusion performs in each:
- Onderhoud (0/100): Stable Video Diffusion is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentatie, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (82/100): Stable Video Diffusion is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdicties including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (1/100): Community adoption is limited. Gebaseerd op GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 62.4/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Stable Video Diffusion?
Stable Video Diffusion is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with infrastructure tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Stable Video Diffusion is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its beveiliging posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Stable Video Diffusion's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Bekijk de repository beveiliging policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active onderhoud.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Stable Video Diffusion's dependency tree. - Beoordeling permissions — Understand what access Stable Video Diffusion requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Stable Video Diffusion in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=stable-video-diffusion - Bekijk de license — Confirm that Stable Video Diffusion's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses beveiliging concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Stable Video Diffusion
When evaluating whether Stable Video Diffusion is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Stable Video Diffusion processes, stores, and transmits your data. Bekijk de tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Stable Video Diffusion's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher beveiliging risk.
Regularly check for updates to Stable Video Diffusion. Beveiliging patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Stable Video Diffusion connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Stable Video Diffusion's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Stable Video Diffusion in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Stable Video Diffusion and the EU AI Act
Stable Video Diffusion is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's naleving assessment covers 52 jurisdicties worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal naleving.
Best Practices for Using Stable Video Diffusion Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Stable Video Diffusion while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Stable Video Diffusion is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and naleving with your beveiliging policies.
Ensure Stable Video Diffusion and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from beveiliging patches.
Grant Stable Video Diffusion only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Stable Video Diffusion's beveiliging advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Stable Video Diffusion is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Stable Video Diffusion?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Stable Video Diffusion in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional naleving review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Stable Video Diffusion's trust score of 62.4/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual beveiliging assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Stable Video Diffusion Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among infrastructure tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Stable Video Diffusion's score of 62.4/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Stable Video Diffusion favorably among infrastructure tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensies.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks matig in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Stable Video Diffusion and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or onderhoud patterns change, Stable Video Diffusion's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to beveiliging and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced onderhoud, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Stable Video Diffusion's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=stable-video-diffusion&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — beveiliging, onderhoud, documentatie, naleving, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Stable Video Diffusion are strengthening or weakening over time.
Stable Video Diffusion vs Alternatieven
In the infrastructure category, Stable Video Diffusion scores 62.4/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Stable Video Diffusion vs n8n — Trust Score: 78.5/100
- Stable Video Diffusion vs langflow — Trust Score: 87.6/100
- Stable Video Diffusion vs dify — Trust Score: 79.1/100
Belangrijkste conclusies
- Stable Video Diffusion has a Trust Score of 62.4/100 (C) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Stable Video Diffusion shows matig trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among infrastructure tools, Stable Video Diffusion scores above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Veelgestelde vragen
Is Stable Video Diffusion veilig?
Wat is de vertrouwensscore van Stable Video Diffusion?
Wat zijn veiligere alternatieven voor Stable Video Diffusion?
Hoe vaak wordt de beveiligingsscore van Stable Video Diffusion bijgewerkt?
Kan ik Stable Video Diffusion gebruiken in een gereguleerde omgeving?
Zie ook
Disclaimer: Nerq-vertrouwensscores zijn geautomatiseerde beoordelingen op basis van openbaar beschikbare signalen. Ze vormen geen aanbeveling of garantie. Voer altijd uw eigen verificatie uit.