Er Open Claw Gate trygt?
Open Claw Gate — Nerq Trust Score 51.7/100 (Karakter D). Poeng basert på 5 independent trust signals.
Open Claw Gate er en software tool har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 51.7/100 (D), based on 5 uavhengige datadimensjoner. Sikkerhet: 0/100. Vedlikehold: 1/100. Popularitet: 0/100. Data hentet fra flere offentlige kilder inkludert pakkeregistre, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev og OpenSSF Scorecard. Sist oppdatert: n/a. Maskinlesbare data (JSON).
Er Open Claw Gate trygt?
Tillitspoeng detaljer — Open Claw Gate har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 51.7/100 (D). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.
Hva er tillitspoengene til Open Claw Gate?
Open Claw Gate har en Nerq-tillitspoeng på 51.7/100 med karakteren D. Denne poengsummen er basert på 5 uavhengig målte dimensjoner, inkludert sikkerhet, vedlikehold og samfunnsadopsjon.
Hva er de viktigste sikkerhetsfunnene for Open Claw Gate?
Open Claw Gates sterkeste signal er samsvar på 96/100. Ingen kjente sårbarheter er funnet.
Hva er Open Claw Gate og hvem vedlikeholder det?
| Utvikler | Kelberwitz |
| Kategori | Devops |
| Kilde | https://github.com/Kelberwitz/Open-Claw-Gate |
| Frameworks | anthropic |
| Protocols | rest |
Regulatorisk samsvar
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 96/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Populære alternativer i devops
What Is Open Claw Gate?
Open Claw Gate is a DevOps tool: An SSH connection launcher for Windows with multi-instance management and OpenClaw tunnel support.. Nerq Trust Score: 52/100 (D).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including sikkerhet vulnerabilities, vedlikehold activity, license samsvar, and fellesskapsadopsjon.
How Nerq Assesses Open Claw Gate's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensjoner. Here is how Open Claw Gate performs in each:
- Sikkerhet (0/100): Open Claw Gate's sikkerhet posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, sikkerhet policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Vedlikehold (1/100): Open Claw Gate is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API dokumentasjon, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (96/100): Open Claw Gate is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Basert på GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 51.7/100 (D) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.
Who Typically Evaluates Open Claw Gate?
Open Claw Gate is commonly evaluated by:
- Developers and teams working with devops tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
How to read the signals: Open Claw Gate's measured signals (sikkerhet 0/100, vedlikehold 1/100, dokumentasjon 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.
How to Verify Open Claw Gate's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Gjennomgå repository's sikkerhet policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active vedlikehold.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for kjente sårbarheter in Open Claw Gate's dependency tree. - Anmeldelse permissions — Understand what access Open Claw Gate requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Open Claw Gate in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Open-Claw-Gate - Gjennomgå license — Confirm that Open Claw Gate's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses sikkerhet concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Open Claw Gate
When evaluating whether Open Claw Gate is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Open Claw Gate processes, stores, and transmits your data. Gjennomgå tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Open Claw Gate's dependency tree for kjente sårbarheter. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher sikkerhet risk.
Regularly check for updates to Open Claw Gate. Sikkerhet patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Open Claw Gate connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Open Claw Gate's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Open Claw Gate in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Open Claw Gate and the EU AI Act
Open Claw Gate is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's samsvar assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal samsvar.
Best Practices for Using Open Claw Gate Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Open Claw Gate while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Open Claw Gate is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and samsvar with your sikkerhet policies.
Ensure Open Claw Gate and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from sikkerhet patches.
Grant Open Claw Gate only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Open Claw Gate's sikkerhet advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Open Claw Gate is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Open Claw Gate
Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Open Claw Gate's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:
- Environments handling sensitive or regulated data (healthcare, finance, government)
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
- Deployments with strict regulatory requirements that must be independently validated
For each situation, compare Open Claw Gate's measured trust score of 51.7/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Open Claw Gate is suitable for any particular use.
How Open Claw Gate Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among DevOps tools, the average Trust Score is 63/100. Open Claw Gate's score of 51.7/100 is below the category average of 63/100.
This suggests that Open Claw Gate trails behind many comparable DevOps tools. Organizations with strict sikkerhet requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderat in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Open Claw Gate and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or vedlikehold patterns change, Open Claw Gate's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to sikkerhet and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced vedlikehold, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Open Claw Gate's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Open-Claw-Gate&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — sikkerhet, vedlikehold, dokumentasjon, samsvar, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Open Claw Gate are strengthening or weakening over time.
Open Claw Gate vs Alternativer
In the devops category, Open Claw Gate scores 51.7/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Open Claw Gate vs ansible — Trust Score: 74.9/100
- Open Claw Gate vs Flowise — Trust Score: 67.5/100
- Open Claw Gate vs learn-claude-code — Trust Score: 72.1/100
Viktigste punkter
- Open Claw Gate has a measured Nerq Trust Score of 51.7/100 (D) — a composite of independent signals, not a suitability judgment.
- Among DevOps tools, Open Claw Gate scores below the category average of 63/100 (a positional measurement relative to peers).
- The individual signals — sikkerhet, vedlikehold, dokumentasjon, samsvar, community — are shown above. Weigh them against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via Nerq's Preflight API.
Ofte stilte spørsmål
Er Open Claw Gate trygt?
Hva er tillitspoengene til Open Claw Gate?
Hva er tryggere alternativer til Open Claw Gate?
Hvor ofte oppdateres Open Claw Gates sikkerhetspoeng?
Kan jeg bruke Open Claw Gate i et regulert miljø?
Se også
Disclaimer: Nerqs tillitspoeng er automatiserte vurderinger basert på offentlig tilgjengelige signaler. De utgjør ikke anbefalinger eller garantier. Utfør alltid din egen verifisering.