Eodhd é seguro?

Eodhd — Nerq Trust Score 42.5/100 (Grau E). Pontuação baseada em 3 independent trust signals.

Eodhd é um software tool com um Nerq Trust Score de 42.5/100 (E), com base em 3 dimensões de dados independentes. Manutenção: 0/100. Popularidade: 0/100. Dados obtidos de múltiplas fontes públicas incluindo registros de pacotes, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev e OpenSSF Scorecard. Última atualização: n/a. Dados legíveis por máquina (JSON).

Eodhd é seguro?

Detalhamento da Pontuação de Confiança — Eodhd has a Nerq Trust Score of 42.5/100 (E). Measured across 3 independent trust signals.

Análise de Segurança → Relatório de Privacidade →

Qual é a pontuação de confiança de Eodhd?

Eodhd tem uma Pontuação de Confiança Nerq de 42.5/100, obtendo grau E. Esta pontuação é baseada em 3 dimensões medidas independentemente.

Manutenção
0
Documentação
0
Popularidade
0

Quais são as principais descobertas de segurança de Eodhd?

O sinal mais forte de Eodhd é manutenção com 0/100. Nenhuma vulnerabilidade conhecida foi detectada.

⚠Manutenção: 0/100 — baixa atividade de manutenção
⚠Documentação: 0/100 — documentação limitada
⚠Popularidade: 0/100 — 1 estrelas em pulsemcp

O que é Eodhd e quem o mantém?

Autorhttps://github.com/mklmto/eodhd-mcp
CategoriaFinance
Stars1
Sourcehttps://github.com/mklmto/eodhd-mcp

Alternativas Populares em finance

OpenBB-finance/OpenBB
69.3/100 · C
github
microsoft/qlib
81.8/100 · A
github
TauricResearch/TradingAgents
78.5/100 · B
github
TradingAgents-CN
72.7/100 · B
github
virattt/dexter
63.9/100 · C
github

What Is Eodhd?

Eodhd is a software tool in the finance category: Connects to EODHD financial data API for various financial information.. It has 1 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 42/100 (E).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including segurança vulnerabilities, manutenção activity, license conformidade, and adoção pela comunidade.

How Nerq Assesses Eodhd's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensões. Here is how Eodhd performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 42.5/100 (E) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates Eodhd?

Eodhd is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: Eodhd's measured signals (manutenção 0/100, documentação 0/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify Eodhd's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Revise o/a repository segurança policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active manutenção.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Eodhd's dependency tree.
  3. Avaliação permissions — Understand what access Eodhd requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Eodhd in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=EODHD
  6. Revise o/a license — Confirm that Eodhd's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses segurança concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Eodhd

When evaluating whether Eodhd is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Eodhd processes, stores, and transmits your data. Revise o/a tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency segurança

Check Eodhd's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher segurança risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Eodhd. Segurança patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Eodhd connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP conformidade

Verify that Eodhd's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Eodhd in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using Eodhd Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Eodhd while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Eodhd is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and conformidade with your segurança policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Eodhd and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from segurança patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Eodhd only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for segurança advisories

Subscribe to Eodhd's segurança advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Eodhd is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Eodhd

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Eodhd's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare Eodhd's measured trust score of 42.5/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Eodhd is suitable for any particular use.

How Eodhd Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among finance tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Eodhd's score of 42.5/100 is below the category average of 62/100.

This suggests that Eodhd trails behind many comparable finance tools. Organizations with strict segurança requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderado in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Eodhd and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or manutenção patterns change, Eodhd's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to segurança and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced manutenção, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Eodhd's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=EODHD&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — segurança, manutenção, documentação, conformidade, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Eodhd are strengthening or weakening over time.

Eodhd vs Alternativas

In the finance category, Eodhd scores 42.5/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Pontos Principais

Perguntas Frequentes

Eodhd é seguro?
EODHD com um Nerq Trust Score de 42.5/100 (E). Sinal mais forte: manutenção (0/100). Pontuação baseada em Manutenção (0/100), Popularidade (0/100), Documentação (0/100).
Qual é a pontuação de confiança de Eodhd?
EODHD: 42.5/100 (E). Pontuação baseada em Manutenção (0/100), Popularidade (0/100), Documentação (0/100). As pontuações são atualizadas quando novos dados estão disponíveis. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=EODHD
Quais são alternativas mais seguras ao Eodhd?
In the Finance category, higher-rated alternatives include OpenBB-finance/OpenBB (69/100), microsoft/qlib (82/100), TauricResearch/TradingAgents (78/100). EODHD scores 42.5/100.
Com que frequência o score de segurança do Eodhd é atualizado?
Nerq recomputes Eodhd's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 42.5/100 (E). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=EODHD
Posso usar Eodhd em um ambiente regulado?
Eodhd: 42.5/100 (E). Compliance signals are shown in the breakdown above. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Veja também

Disclaimer: As pontuações de confiança da Nerq são avaliações automatizadas baseadas em sinais publicamente disponíveis. Não são endossos ou garantias. Sempre realize sua própria verificação.

Usamos cookies para análise e cache. Privacidade