Este Figma Mcp Proxy sigur?

Figma Mcp Proxy — Nerq Trust Score 51.2/100 (Nota D). Scor bazat pe 5 independent trust signals.

Figma Mcp Proxy este un software tool cu un Scor de Încredere Nerq de 51.2/100 (D), based on 5 dimensiuni independente de date. Securitate: 0/100. Mentenanță: 1/100. Popularitate: 0/100. Date provenite din multiple surse publice inclusiv registre de pachete, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev și OpenSSF Scorecard. Ultima actualizare: n/a. Date citibile de mașină (JSON).

Este Figma Mcp Proxy sigur?

Detalii scor de încredere — Figma Mcp Proxy has a Nerq Trust Score of 51.2/100 (D). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.

Analiză de Securitate → Raport de confidențialitate Figma Mcp Proxy →

Care este scorul de încredere al Figma Mcp Proxy?

Figma Mcp Proxy are un Nerq Trust Score de 51.2/100 cu nota D. Acest scor se bazează pe 5 dimensiuni măsurate independent, inclusiv securitate, întreținere și adopție comunitară.

Securitate
0
Conformitate
100
Mentenanță
1
Documentație
1
Popularitate
0

Care sunt principalele constatări de securitate pentru Figma Mcp Proxy?

Cel mai puternic semnal al Figma Mcp Proxy este conformitate la 100/100. Nu au fost detectate vulnerabilități cunoscute.

⚠Scor de securitate: 0/100 (slab)
⚠Mentenanță: 1/100 — activitate redusă de întreținere
⚠Conformitate: 100/100 — covers 52 of 52 jurisdictions
⚠Documentație: 1/100 — documentare limitată
⚠Popularitate: 0/100 — 4 stele pe github

Ce este Figma Mcp Proxy și cine îl întreține?

Autorbitovi
CategorieDesign
Stele4
Sursăhttps://github.com/bitovi/figma-mcp-proxy
Protocolsmcp · rest

Conformitate reglementară

EU AI Act Risk ClassMINIMAL
Compliance Score100/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

Alternative populare în design

invoke-ai/InvokeAI
64.4/100 · C
github
onlook-dev/onlook
63.4/100 · C
github
Figma Context
53.3/100 · D
pulsemcp
Anionex/banana-slides
64.4/100 · C
github
creativetimofficial/ui
73.9/100 · B
github

What Is Figma Mcp Proxy?

Figma Mcp Proxy is a software tool in the design category: A Go-based HTTP proxy server that integrates with Figma to enhance MCP tool calls.. It has 4 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 51/100 (D).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including securitate vulnerabilities, mentenanță activity, license conformitate, and adoptare comunitară.

How Nerq Assesses Figma Mcp Proxy's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensiuni. Here is how Figma Mcp Proxy performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 51.2/100 (D) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates Figma Mcp Proxy?

Figma Mcp Proxy is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: Figma Mcp Proxy's measured signals (securitate 0/100, mentenanță 1/100, documentație 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify Figma Mcp Proxy's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Verificați repository's securitate policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active mentenanță.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Figma Mcp Proxy's dependency tree.
  3. Recenzie permissions — Understand what access Figma Mcp Proxy requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Figma Mcp Proxy in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=figma-mcp-proxy
  6. Verificați license — Confirm that Figma Mcp Proxy's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses securitate concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Figma Mcp Proxy

When evaluating whether Figma Mcp Proxy is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Figma Mcp Proxy processes, stores, and transmits your data. Verificați tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency securitate

Check Figma Mcp Proxy's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher securitate risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Figma Mcp Proxy. Securitate patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Figma Mcp Proxy connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP conformitate

Verify that Figma Mcp Proxy's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Figma Mcp Proxy in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Figma Mcp Proxy and the EU AI Act

Figma Mcp Proxy is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.

Nerq's conformitate assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal conformitate.

Best Practices for Using Figma Mcp Proxy Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Figma Mcp Proxy while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Figma Mcp Proxy is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and conformitate with your securitate policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Figma Mcp Proxy and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from securitate patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Figma Mcp Proxy only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for securitate advisories

Subscribe to Figma Mcp Proxy's securitate advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Figma Mcp Proxy is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Figma Mcp Proxy

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Figma Mcp Proxy's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare Figma Mcp Proxy's measured trust score of 51.2/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Figma Mcp Proxy is suitable for any particular use.

How Figma Mcp Proxy Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among design tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Figma Mcp Proxy's score of 51.2/100 is below the category average of 62/100.

This suggests that Figma Mcp Proxy trails behind many comparable design tools. Organizations with strict securitate requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderat in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Figma Mcp Proxy and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or mentenanță patterns change, Figma Mcp Proxy's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to securitate and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced mentenanță, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Figma Mcp Proxy's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=figma-mcp-proxy&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — securitate, mentenanță, documentație, conformitate, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Figma Mcp Proxy are strengthening or weakening over time.

Figma Mcp Proxy vs Alternative

In the design category, Figma Mcp Proxy scores 51.2/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Concluzii principale

Întrebări frecvente

Este Figma Mcp Proxy sigur?
figma-mcp-proxy cu un Scor de Încredere Nerq de 51.2/100 (D). Cel mai puternic semnal: conformitate (100/100). Scor bazat pe Securitate (0/100), Mentenanță (1/100), Popularitate (0/100), Documentație (1/100).
Care este scorul de încredere al Figma Mcp Proxy?
figma-mcp-proxy: 51.2/100 (D). Scor bazat pe Securitate (0/100), Mentenanță (1/100), Popularitate (0/100), Documentație (1/100). Compliance: 100/100. Scorurile se actualizează când devin disponibile date noi. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=figma-mcp-proxy
Care sunt alternative mai sigure la Figma Mcp Proxy?
În categoria Design, higher-rated alternatives include invoke-ai/InvokeAI (64/100), onlook-dev/onlook (63/100), Figma Context (53/100). figma-mcp-proxy scores 51.2/100.
Cât de des este actualizat scorul de securitate al Figma Mcp Proxy?
Nerq recomputes Figma Mcp Proxy's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 51.2/100 (D). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=figma-mcp-proxy
Pot folosi Figma Mcp Proxy într-un mediu reglementat?
Figma Mcp Proxy: 51.2/100 (D). Compliance: 52 of 52 jurisdictions. EU AI Act compliant. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Vezi și

Disclaimer: Scorurile de încredere Nerq sunt evaluări automatizate bazate pe semnale disponibile public. Nu sunt recomandări sau garanții. Efectuați întotdeauna propria verificare.

Folosim cookie-uri pentru analiză și cache. Confidențialitate