Este Openclawhomeassistant sigur?
Openclawhomeassistant — Nerq Trust Score 66.8/100 (Nota C). Scor bazat pe 5 independent trust signals.
Openclawhomeassistant este un software tool cu un Scor de Încredere Nerq de 66.8/100 (C), based on 5 dimensiuni independente de date. Securitate: 0/100. Mentenanță: 1/100. Popularitate: 0/100. Date provenite din multiple surse publice inclusiv registre de pachete, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev și OpenSSF Scorecard. Ultima actualizare: n/a. Date citibile de mașină (JSON).
Este Openclawhomeassistant sigur?
Detalii scor de încredere — Openclawhomeassistant has a Nerq Trust Score of 66.8/100 (C). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.
Care este scorul de încredere al Openclawhomeassistant?
Openclawhomeassistant are un Nerq Trust Score de 66.8/100 cu nota C. Acest scor se bazează pe 5 dimensiuni măsurate independent, inclusiv securitate, întreținere și adopție comunitară.
Care sunt principalele constatări de securitate pentru Openclawhomeassistant?
Cel mai puternic semnal al Openclawhomeassistant este conformitate la 84/100. Nu au fost detectate vulnerabilități cunoscute.
Ce este Openclawhomeassistant și cine îl întreține?
| Autor | 0xA2C3B1F4 |
| Categorie | Devops |
| Sursă | https://github.com/0xA2C3B1F4/OpenClawHomeAssistant |
| Protocols | rest · websocket |
Conformitate reglementară
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 84/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Alternative populare în devops
What Is Openclawhomeassistant?
Openclawhomeassistant is a DevOps tool: OpenClaw Home Assistant Add-on for background automation and API coverage.. Nerq Trust Score: 67/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including securitate vulnerabilities, mentenanță activity, license conformitate, and adoptare comunitară.
How Nerq Assesses Openclawhomeassistant's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensiuni. Here is how Openclawhomeassistant performs in each:
- Securitate (0/100): Openclawhomeassistant's securitate posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, securitate policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Mentenanță (1/100): Openclawhomeassistant is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentație, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (84/100): Openclawhomeassistant is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Bazat pe GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 66.8/100 (C) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.
Who Typically Evaluates Openclawhomeassistant?
Openclawhomeassistant is commonly evaluated by:
- Developers and teams working with devops tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
How to read the signals: Openclawhomeassistant's measured signals (securitate 0/100, mentenanță 1/100, documentație 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.
How to Verify Openclawhomeassistant's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Verificați repository's securitate policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active mentenanță.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Openclawhomeassistant's dependency tree. - Recenzie permissions — Understand what access Openclawhomeassistant requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Openclawhomeassistant in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=OpenClawHomeAssistant - Verificați license — Confirm that Openclawhomeassistant's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses securitate concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Openclawhomeassistant
When evaluating whether Openclawhomeassistant is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Openclawhomeassistant processes, stores, and transmits your data. Verificați tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Openclawhomeassistant's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher securitate risk.
Regularly check for updates to Openclawhomeassistant. Securitate patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Openclawhomeassistant connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Openclawhomeassistant's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Openclawhomeassistant in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Openclawhomeassistant and the EU AI Act
Openclawhomeassistant is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's conformitate assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal conformitate.
Best Practices for Using Openclawhomeassistant Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Openclawhomeassistant while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Openclawhomeassistant is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and conformitate with your securitate policies.
Ensure Openclawhomeassistant and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from securitate patches.
Grant Openclawhomeassistant only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Openclawhomeassistant's securitate advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Openclawhomeassistant is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Openclawhomeassistant
Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Openclawhomeassistant's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:
- Environments handling sensitive or regulated data (healthcare, finance, government)
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
- Deployments with strict regulatory requirements that must be independently validated
For each situation, compare Openclawhomeassistant's measured trust score of 66.8/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Openclawhomeassistant is suitable for any particular use.
How Openclawhomeassistant Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among DevOps tools, the average Trust Score is 63/100. Openclawhomeassistant's score of 66.8/100 is above the category average of 63/100.
This positions Openclawhomeassistant favorably among DevOps tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensiuni.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderat in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Openclawhomeassistant and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or mentenanță patterns change, Openclawhomeassistant's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to securitate and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced mentenanță, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Openclawhomeassistant's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=OpenClawHomeAssistant&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — securitate, mentenanță, documentație, conformitate, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Openclawhomeassistant are strengthening or weakening over time.
Openclawhomeassistant vs Alternative
In the devops category, Openclawhomeassistant scores 66.8/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Openclawhomeassistant vs ansible — Trust Score: 74.9/100
- Openclawhomeassistant vs Flowise — Trust Score: 67.5/100
- Openclawhomeassistant vs learn-claude-code — Trust Score: 72.1/100
Concluzii principale
- Openclawhomeassistant has a measured Nerq Trust Score of 66.8/100 (C) — a composite of independent signals, not a suitability judgment.
- Among DevOps tools, Openclawhomeassistant scores above the category average of 63/100 (a positional measurement relative to peers).
- The individual signals — securitate, mentenanță, documentație, conformitate, community — are shown above. Weigh them against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via Nerq's Preflight API.
Întrebări frecvente
Este Openclawhomeassistant sigur?
Care este scorul de încredere al Openclawhomeassistant?
Care sunt alternative mai sigure la Openclawhomeassistant?
Cât de des este actualizat scorul de securitate al Openclawhomeassistant?
Pot folosi Openclawhomeassistant într-un mediu reglementat?
Vezi și
Disclaimer: Scorurile de încredere Nerq sunt evaluări automatizate bazate pe semnale disponibile public. Nu sunt recomandări sau garanții. Efectuați întotdeauna propria verificare.