Is Adobe Acrobat Reader Safe?
Adobe Acrobat Reader — Nerq Trust Score 62.0/100 (C+ grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12
Adobe Acrobat Reader is a Android app with a Nerq Trust Score of 62.0/100 (C+), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12 Security: 70/100. Popularity: 95/100. Data sourced from Google Play metadata, Data Safety section, Exodus Privacy tracker analysis, and user ratings. Last updated: 2026-04-12. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Adobe Acrobat Reader safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Adobe Acrobat Reader has a Nerq Trust Score of 62.0/100 (C+). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-04-12).
What is Adobe Acrobat Reader's trust score?
Adobe Acrobat Reader has a Nerq Trust Score of 62.0/100, earning a C+ grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Adobe Acrobat Reader?
Adobe Acrobat Reader's strongest signal is popularity at 95/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Adobe Acrobat Reader and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | Android Apps |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Android by Trust Score
Compare
Safety Guide: Adobe Acrobat Reader
What is Adobe Acrobat Reader?
Adobe Acrobat Reader is a Android app — PDF viewer, editor, and annotator..
How to Verify Safety
Review Data Safety section in Google Play. Check permissions and ad trackers.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=Adobe Acrobat Reader
Key Safety Concerns for Android app
When evaluating any Android app, watch for: excessive permissions, data collection, ad trackers, background data usage.
Measured Signals
Adobe Acrobat Reader has a Nerq Trust Score of 62/100 (C+). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Adobe Acrobat Reader has a Trust Score of 62/100 (C+).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 70/100 |
| Maintenance | 60/100 |
| Popularity | 95/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 |
| Community | 50/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from Google Play metadata, Data Safety section, Exodus Privacy tracker analysis, and user ratings.
What data does Adobe Acrobat Reader collect?
Privacy assessment for Adobe Acrobat Reader is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.
Is Adobe Acrobat Reader secure?
Security score: 70/100 (0-100, higher = fewer measured security issues).
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Adobe Acrobat Reader Security Report
How we calculated this score
Adobe Acrobat Reader's trust score of 62.0/100 (C+) is computed from Google Play metadata, Data Safety section, Exodus Privacy tracker analysis, and user ratings. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (70/100), maintenance (60/100), popularity (95/100), quality (30/100), community (50/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
Signals last measured on April 12, 2026. Data version: 0.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Adobe Acrobat Reader Safe?
What is Adobe Acrobat Reader's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Adobe Acrobat Reader?
Is Adobe Acrobat Reader safe for kids?
Does Adobe Acrobat Reader track me?
Popular in Android Apps
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.