Is Agentbench Safe?

Agentbench — Nerq Trust Score 65.5/100 (B- grade). Based on analysis of 5 trust dimensions, it is generally safe but has some concerns. Last updated: 2026-05-13.

Use Agentbench with some caution. Agentbench is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 65.5/100 (B-). Below the recommended threshold of 70. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-05-13. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Agentbench safe?

CAUTION — Agentbench has a Nerq Trust Score of 65.5/100 (B-). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Security Analysis → Agentbench Privacy Report →

What is Agentbench's trust score?

Agentbench has a Nerq Trust Score of 65.5/100, earning a B- grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Overall Trust
65.5

What are the key security findings for Agentbench?

Agentbench's strongest signal is overall trust at 65.5/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Composite trust score: 65.5/100 across all available signals

What is Agentbench and who maintains it?

AuthorUnknown
CategoryDevops
Stars1
SourceN/A

Popular Alternatives in devops

ansible/ansible
76.8/100 · B+
github
FlowiseAI/Flowise
63.3/100 · C+
github
shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code
69.2/100 · B-
github
continuedev/continue
64.4/100 · C+
github
wshobson/agents
70.5/100 · B
github

What Is Agentbench?

Agentbench is a DevOps tool with 1 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 66/100 (B-).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.

How Nerq Assesses Agentbench's Safety

Nerq evaluates every software tool across 13+ independent trust signals drawn from public sources including GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, OpenSSF Scorecard, and package registries. These signals are grouped into five core dimensions: Security (known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policies), Maintenance (commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times), Documentation (README quality, API docs, examples), Compliance (license, regulatory alignment across 52 jurisdictions), and Community (stars, forks, downloads, ecosystem integrations).

Agentbench receives an overall Trust Score of 65.5/100 (B-), which Nerq considers moderate. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Nerq updates trust scores continuously as new data becomes available. To get the latest assessment, query the API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=AgentBench

Each dimension is weighted according to its importance for the tool's category. For example, Security and Maintenance carry higher weight for tools that handle sensitive data or execute code, while Community and Documentation are weighted more heavily for developer-facing libraries and frameworks. This ensures that Agentbench's score reflects the risks most relevant to its actual usage patterns. The final score is a weighted average across all five dimensions, normalized to a 0-100 scale with letter grades from A (highest) to F (lowest).

Who Should Use Agentbench?

Agentbench is designed for:

Risk guidance: Agentbench is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.

How to Verify Agentbench's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Agentbench's dependency tree.
  3. Review permissions — Understand what access Agentbench requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Agentbench in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=AgentBench
  6. Review the license — Confirm that Agentbench's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Agentbench

When evaluating whether Agentbench is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Agentbench processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Agentbench's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Agentbench. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Agentbench connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Agentbench's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Agentbench in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using Agentbench Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Agentbench while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Agentbench is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Agentbench and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Agentbench only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Agentbench's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Agentbench is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid Agentbench?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Agentbench in these scenarios:

For each scenario, evaluate whether Agentbench's trust score of 65.5/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How Agentbench Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among DevOps tools, the average Trust Score is 63/100. Agentbench's score of 65.5/100 is above the category average of 63/100.

This positions Agentbench favorably among DevOps tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensions.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Agentbench and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Agentbench's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Agentbench's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=AgentBench&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Agentbench are strengthening or weakening over time.

Agentbench vs Alternatives

In the devops category, Agentbench scores 65.5/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Key Takeaways

What data does Agentbench collect?

Privacy assessment for Agentbench is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.

Is Agentbench secure?

Security score: under assessment. Review security practices and consider alternatives with higher security scores for sensitive use cases.

Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.

Full analysis: Agentbench Security Report

How we calculated this score

Agentbench's trust score of 65.5/100 (B-) is computed from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. The score reflects 0 independent dimensions: . Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.

Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.

This page was last reviewed on May 13, 2026. Data version: 1.0.

Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Agentbench Safe?
Use with some caution. AgentBench with a Nerq Trust Score of 65.5/100 (B-). Strongest signal: overall trust (65.5/100). Score based on multiple trust dimensions.
What is Agentbench's trust score?
AgentBench: 65.5/100 (B-). Score based on multiple trust dimensions. Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=AgentBench
What are safer alternatives to Agentbench?
In the Devops category, higher-rated alternatives include ansible/ansible (77/100), FlowiseAI/Flowise (63/100), shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code (69/100). AgentBench scores 65.5/100.
How often is Agentbench's safety score updated?
Nerq continuously monitors Agentbench and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 65.5/100 (B-), last verified 2026-05-13. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=AgentBench
Can I use Agentbench in a regulated environment?
Agentbench has not reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Additional due diligence is recommended.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy