Is Automated Competitive Programming Safe?

Automated Competitive Programming — Nerq Trust Score 48.2/100 (D grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-03-25

Automated Competitive Programming is a Python package with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-03-25 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from PyPI registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-25. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Automated Competitive Programming safe?

Trust Score Breakdown — Automated Competitive Programming has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-03-25).

Security Analysis → Automated Competitive Programming Privacy Report →

What is Automated Competitive Programming's trust score?

Automated Competitive Programming has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Automated Competitive Programming?

Automated Competitive Programming's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

What is Automated Competitive Programming and who maintains it?

AuthorDan Sclearov
CategoryPython Packages
SourceN/A

Similar Pypi by Trust Score

bccovideda (58)allure-pytest-default-results (58)analytics-mcp (58)bech32m (58)chem (58)
See all safest Pypi →

Compare

Automated Competitive Programming vs bccovidedaAutomated Competitive Programming vs allure-pytest-default-resultsAutomated Competitive Programming vs analytics-mcp

Safety Guide: Automated Competitive Programming

What is Automated Competitive Programming?

Automated Competitive Programming is a Python package — Easier competitive programming..

How to Verify Safety

Run pip audit or safety check. Review on PyPI for download stats.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=automated-competitive-programming

Key Safety Concerns for Python package

When evaluating any Python package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, malicious uploads, maintenance status.

Measured Signals

Automated Competitive Programming has a Nerq Trust Score of 48/100 (D). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Automated Competitive Programming Safe?
automated-competitive-programming with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100).
What is Automated Competitive Programming's trust score?
automated-competitive-programming: 48.2/100 (D). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=automated-competitive-programming
What are safer alternatives to Automated Competitive Programming?
In the Python Packages category, more Python packages are being analyzed — check back soon. automated-competitive-programming scores 48.2/100.
Does Automated Competitive Programming have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Automated Competitive Programming against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Is Automated Competitive Programming actively maintained?
Automated Competitive Programming maintenance score: N/A. Check the repository for recent commit activity and issue responsiveness.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy