Is Bato Image Auto Fixer Safe?
Bato Image Auto Fixer — Nerq Trust Score 50.5/100 (C- grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12
Bato Image Auto Fixer is a Firefox extension with a Nerq Trust Score of 50.5/100 (C-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 15/100. Data sourced from addons.mozilla.org metadata, permissions analysis, and source code availability. Last updated: 2026-04-12. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Bato Image Auto Fixer safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Bato Image Auto Fixer has a Nerq Trust Score of 50.5/100 (C-). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-04-12).
What is Bato Image Auto Fixer's trust score?
Bato Image Auto Fixer has a Nerq Trust Score of 50.5/100, earning a C- grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Bato Image Auto Fixer?
Bato Image Auto Fixer's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Bato Image Auto Fixer and who maintains it?
| Author | RaidenOQ |
| Category | Firefox Add-ons |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Firefox by Trust Score
Compare
Safety Guide: Bato Image Auto Fixer
What is Bato Image Auto Fixer?
Bato Image Auto Fixer is a Firefox add-on — Detect broken bato.to images and automatically fix them..
How to Verify Safety
Review permissions on addons.mozilla.org. Check if source code is available.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=Bato Image Auto-Fixer
Key Safety Concerns for Firefox add-on
When evaluating any Firefox add-on, watch for: excessive permissions, data harvesting.
Measured Signals
Bato Image Auto Fixer has a Nerq Trust Score of 50/100 (C-). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Bato Image Auto Fixer has a Trust Score of 50/100 (C-).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 90/100 |
| Maintenance | 50/100 |
| Popularity | 15/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 |
| Community | 35/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from addons.mozilla.org metadata, permissions analysis, and source code availability.
What data does Bato Image Auto Fixer collect?
Bato Image Auto Fixer has a privacy score of 90/100. Review the documentation and privacy policy for data handling details.
Full analysis: Bato Image Auto Fixer Privacy Report · Privacy review
Is Bato Image Auto Fixer secure?
Security score: 90/100 (0-100, higher = fewer measured security issues).
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Bato Image Auto Fixer Security Report
How we calculated this score
Bato Image Auto Fixer's trust score of 50.5/100 (C-) is computed from addons.mozilla.org metadata, permissions analysis, and source code availability. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (90/100), maintenance (50/100), popularity (15/100), quality (40/100), community (35/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
Signals last measured on April 12, 2026. Data version: 1.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Bato Image Auto Fixer Safe?
What is Bato Image Auto Fixer's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Bato Image Auto Fixer?
What permissions does Bato Image Auto Fixer need?
Is Bato Image Auto Fixer open source?
Popular in Firefox Add-ons
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.