Is Cggmp21 Safe?
Cggmp21 — Nerq Trust Score 46.0/100 (F grade). Score based on 5 independent trust signals.
Cggmp21 is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 46.0/100 (F). Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: n/a. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Cggmp21 safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Cggmp21 has a Nerq Trust Score of 46.0/100 (F). Measured across 1 independent trust signal.
What is Cggmp21's trust score?
Cggmp21 has a Nerq Trust Score of 46.0/100, earning a F grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Cggmp21?
Cggmp21's strongest signal is overall trust at 46.0/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Cggmp21 and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | Rust Crates |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Crates by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Cggmp21
What is Cggmp21?
Cggmp21 is a Rust crate — TSS ECDSA implementation based on CGGMP21 paper.
How to Verify Safety
Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=cggmp21
Key Safety Concerns for Rust crate
When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.
Measured Signals
Cggmp21 has a Nerq Trust Score of 46/100 (F). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Cggmp21 has a Trust Score of 46/100 (F).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Cggmp21 Safe?
What is Cggmp21's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Cggmp21?
Does Cggmp21 have known vulnerabilities?
Does Cggmp21 use unsafe code?
Popular in Rust Crates
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.