Is Couchbase Linux X64 Napi Safe?

Couchbase Linux X64 Napi — Nerq Trust Score 71.5/100 (B grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is generally safe but has some concerns. Last updated: 2026-04-08.

Yes, Couchbase Linux X64 Napi is safe to use. Couchbase Linux X64 Napi is a npm package with a Nerq Trust Score of 71.5/100 (B), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Recommended for production use. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 60/100. Data sourced from npm registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-04-08. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Couchbase Linux X64 Napi safe?

YES — Couchbase Linux X64 Napi has a Nerq Trust Score of 71.5/100 (B). It meets Nerq's trust threshold with strong signals across security, maintenance, and community adoption. Recommended for production use — review the full report below for specific considerations.

Security Analysis → Couchbase Linux X64 Napi Privacy Report →

What is Couchbase Linux X64 Napi's trust score?

Couchbase Linux X64 Napi has a Nerq Trust Score of 71.5/100, earning a B grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
60

What are the key security findings for Couchbase Linux X64 Napi?

Couchbase Linux X64 Napi's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It meets the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 60/100 — community adoption

What is Couchbase Linux X64 Napi and who maintains it?

Authorcouchbase-bot
Categorynpm Packages
SourceN/A

Similar Npm by Trust Score

pg-pool (82)@rjsf/core (82)@aws-sdk/client-comprehend (82)@tinymce/tinymce-react (82)@mui/x-data-grid-generator (82)
See all safest Npm →

Compare

Couchbase Linux X64 Napi vs pg-poolCouchbase Linux X64 Napi vs @rjsf/coreCouchbase Linux X64 Napi vs @aws-sdk/client-comprehend

Safety Guide: Couchbase Linux X64 Napi

What is Couchbase Linux X64 Napi?

Couchbase Linux X64 Napi is a Node.js package — Couchbase Node.js SDK platform specific binary for napi runtime on linux OS with x64 architecture and boringssl..

How to Verify Safety

Run npm audit to check for vulnerabilities. Review the package's GitHub repository for recent commits.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=@couchbase/couchbase-linux-x64-napi

Key Safety Concerns for Node.js package

When evaluating any Node.js package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, malicious packages, typosquatting.

Trust Assessment

Couchbase Linux X64 Napi has a Nerq Trust Score of 72/100 (B) and meets Nerq trust threshold. This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Couchbase Linux X64 Napi Safe?
Yes, it is safe to use. @couchbase/couchbase-linux-x64-napi with a Nerq Trust Score of 71.5/100 (B). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (60/100).
What is Couchbase Linux X64 Napi's trust score?
@couchbase/couchbase-linux-x64-napi: 71.5/100 (B). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (60/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=@couchbase/couchbase-linux-x64-napi
What are safer alternatives to Couchbase Linux X64 Napi?
In the npm Packages category, more Node.js packages are being analyzed — check back soon. @couchbase/couchbase-linux-x64-napi scores 71.5/100.
Does Couchbase Linux X64 Napi have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Couchbase Linux X64 Napi against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Is Couchbase Linux X64 Napi actively maintained?
Couchbase Linux X64 Napi maintenance score: N/A. Check the repository for recent commit activity and issue responsiveness.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy