Is Enhancer For Youtube™ Safe?
Enhancer For Youtube™ — Nerq Trust Score 55.0/100 (C grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12
Enhancer For Youtube™ is a Firefox extension with a Nerq Trust Score of 55.0/100 (C), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 45/100. Data sourced from addons.mozilla.org metadata, permissions analysis, and source code availability. Last updated: 2026-04-12. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Enhancer For Youtube™ safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Enhancer For Youtube™ has a Nerq Trust Score of 55.0/100 (C). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-04-12).
What is Enhancer For Youtube™'s trust score?
Enhancer For Youtube™ has a Nerq Trust Score of 55.0/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Enhancer For Youtube™?
Enhancer For Youtube™'s strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Enhancer For Youtube™ and who maintains it?
| Author | Max RF |
| Category | Firefox Add-ons |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Firefox by Trust Score
Compare
Safety Guide: Enhancer For Youtube™
What is Enhancer For Youtube™?
Enhancer For Youtube™ is a Firefox add-on — Take control of YouTube and boost your user experience!.
How to Verify Safety
Review permissions on addons.mozilla.org. Check if source code is available.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=Enhancer for YouTube™
Key Safety Concerns for Firefox add-on
When evaluating any Firefox add-on, watch for: excessive permissions, data harvesting.
Measured Signals
Enhancer For Youtube™ has a Nerq Trust Score of 55/100 (C). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Enhancer For Youtube™ has a Trust Score of 55/100 (C).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 90/100 |
| Maintenance | 50/100 |
| Popularity | 45/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 |
| Community | 35/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from addons.mozilla.org metadata, permissions analysis, and source code availability.
What data does Enhancer For Youtube™ collect?
Enhancer For Youtube™ has a privacy score of 90/100. Review the documentation and privacy policy for data handling details.
Full analysis: Enhancer For Youtube™ Privacy Report · Privacy review
Is Enhancer For Youtube™ secure?
Security score: 90/100 (0-100, higher = fewer measured security issues).
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Enhancer For Youtube™ Security Report
How we calculated this score
Enhancer For Youtube™'s trust score of 55.0/100 (C) is computed from addons.mozilla.org metadata, permissions analysis, and source code availability. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (90/100), maintenance (50/100), popularity (45/100), quality (40/100), community (35/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
Signals last measured on April 12, 2026. Data version: 1.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Enhancer For Youtube™ Safe?
What is Enhancer For Youtube™'s trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Enhancer For Youtube™?
What permissions does Enhancer For Youtube™ need?
Is Enhancer For Youtube™ open source?
Popular in Firefox Add-ons
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.