Is Fingerprint Safe?

Fingerprint — Nerq Trust Score 55.0/100 (C grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-04-04.

Use Fingerprint with some caution. Fingerprint is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 55.0/100 (C), based on 3 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 45/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-04-04. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Fingerprint safe?

CAUTION — Fingerprint has a Nerq Trust Score of 55.0/100 (C). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Security Analysis → {name} Privacy Report →

What is Fingerprint's trust score?

Fingerprint has a Nerq Trust Score of 55.0/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
45

What are the key security findings for Fingerprint?

Fingerprint's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 45/100 — community adoption

What is Fingerprint and who maintains it?

AuthorUnknown
Categorycrates
SourceN/A

Similar Crates by Trust Score

data-encoding (63)async-stream (63)unindent (63)simd-adler32 (63)ciborium-io (63)
See all safest Crates →

Compare

Fingerprint vs data-encodingFingerprint vs async-streamFingerprint vs unindent

Safety Guide: Fingerprint

What is Fingerprint?

Fingerprint is a Rust crate — Rust file fingerprinting library, supporting many types of audio/video/image/text/raw file formats..

How to Verify Safety

Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=fingerprint

Key Safety Concerns for Rust crates

When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.

Trust Assessment

Fingerprint has a Nerq Trust Score of 55/100 (C) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Fingerprint safe to use?
Use with some caution. fingerprint has a Nerq Trust Score of 55.0/100 (C). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on security (90/100), popularity (45/100).
What is Fingerprint's trust score?
fingerprint: 55.0/100 (C). Score based on: security (90/100), popularity (45/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=fingerprint
What are safer alternatives to Fingerprint?
In the crates category, more Rust crates are being analyzed — check back soon. fingerprint scores 55.0/100.
Does Fingerprint have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Fingerprint against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Does Fingerprint use unsafe code?
Check Fingerprint's crate documentation for unsafe code usage. Trust score: 55.0/100. Fewer unsafe blocks generally indicates better memory safety.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Browse Categories

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy