Is Gus Safe?
Gus — Nerq Trust Score 53.0/100 (C- grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-03-25
Gus is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100 (C-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-03-25 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 45/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-03-25. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Gus safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Gus has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100 (C-). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-03-25).
What is Gus's trust score?
Gus has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100, earning a C- grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Gus?
Gus's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Gus and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | Rust Crates |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Crates by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Gus
What is Gus?
Gus is a Rust crate — gus.
How to Verify Safety
Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=gus
Key Safety Concerns for Rust crate
When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.
Measured Signals
Gus has a Nerq Trust Score of 53/100 (C-). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Gus has a Trust Score of 53/100 (C-).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Gus Safe?
What is Gus's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Gus?
Does Gus have known vulnerabilities?
Does Gus use unsafe code?
Popular in Rust Crates
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.