Is Jarvis Safe?
Jarvis — Nerq Trust Score 56.5/100 (C grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-05-20.
Use Jarvis with some caution. Jarvis is a WordPress plugin with a Nerq Trust Score of 56.5/100 (C), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 30/100. Data sourced from WordPress.org metadata, WPScan vulnerability database, active installs, and update history. Last updated: 2026-03-20. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Jarvis safe?
CAUTION — Jarvis has a Nerq Trust Score of 56.5/100 (C). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.
What is Jarvis's trust score?
Jarvis has a Nerq Trust Score of 56.5/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Jarvis?
Jarvis's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
What is Jarvis and who maintains it?
| Author | <a href="https://profiles.wordpress.org/wdgdc/">WDG</a> |
| Category | WordPress Plugins |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Wordpress by Trust Score
Compare
Safety Guide: Jarvis
What is Jarvis?
Jarvis is a WordPress plugin — Jarvis is your admin assistant, putting WordPress at your fingertips via a quicksearch interface..
How to Verify Safety
Check WordPress.org for support response time, tested WP version. Cross-reference with WPScan.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=Jarvis
Key Safety Concerns for WordPress plugin
When evaluating any WordPress plugin, watch for: known vulnerabilities, PHP compatibility, plugin conflicts.
Trust Assessment
Jarvis has a Nerq Trust Score of 56/100 (C) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Jarvis has a Trust Score of 56/100 (C).
- Review carefully before use — below trust threshold.
- Always verify independently using the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 90/100 |
| Maintenance | 65/100 |
| Popularity | 30/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 |
| Community | 35/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from WordPress.org metadata, WPScan vulnerability database, active installs, and update history.
What data does Jarvis collect?
Privacy assessment for Jarvis is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.
Is Jarvis secure?
Security score: 90/100. This meets the recommended security threshold for production use.
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Jarvis Security Report
How we calculated this score
Jarvis's trust score of 56.5/100 (C) is computed from WordPress.org metadata, WPScan vulnerability database, active installs, and update history. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (90/100), maintenance (65/100), popularity (30/100), quality (40/100), community (35/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
This page was last reviewed on May 20, 2026. Data version: 0.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Jarvis Safe?
What is Jarvis's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Jarvis?
Does Jarvis have known vulnerabilities?
Is Jarvis compatible with the latest WordPress?
Popular in WordPress Plugins
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.