Is Lmnr Safe?
Lmnr — Nerq Trust Score 61.2/100 (C+ grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals.
Lmnr is a Python package with a Nerq Trust Score of 61.2/100 (C+), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 100/100. Data sourced from PyPI registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: n/a. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Lmnr safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Lmnr has a Nerq Trust Score of 61.2/100 (C+). Measured across 2 independent trust signals.
What is Lmnr's trust score?
Lmnr has a Nerq Trust Score of 61.2/100, earning a C+ grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Lmnr?
Lmnr's strongest signal is popularity at 100/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Lmnr and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | Python Packages |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Pypi by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Lmnr
What is Lmnr?
Lmnr is a Python package.
How to Verify Safety
Run pip audit or safety check. Review on PyPI for download stats.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=lmnr
Key Safety Concerns for Python package
When evaluating any Python package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, malicious uploads, maintenance status.
Measured Signals
Lmnr has a Nerq Trust Score of 61/100 (C+). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Lmnr has a Trust Score of 61/100 (C+).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Lmnr Safe?
What is Lmnr's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Lmnr?
Does Lmnr have known vulnerabilities?
Is Lmnr actively maintained?
Popular in Python Packages
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.