Is Mao Safe?
Use Mao with some caution. Mao is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100 (C-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 45/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-03-26. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Mao safe?
CAUTION — Mao has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100 (C-). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.
Trust Score Breakdown
Key Findings
Details
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | crates |
| Source | N/A |
Safety Guide: Mao
What is Mao?
Mao is a Rust crate — Dev tool.
How to Verify Safety
Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=mao
Key Safety Concerns for Rust crates
When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.
Trust Assessment
Mao has a Nerq Trust Score of 53/100 (C-) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Mao has a Trust Score of 53/100 (C-).
- Review carefully before use — below trust threshold.
- Always verify independently using the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Mao safe to use?
What is Mao's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Mao?
Does Mao have known vulnerabilities?
Does Mao use unsafe code?
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.