Is Mao Safe?
Mao — Nerq Trust Score 53.0/100 (C- grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-03-25
Mao is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100 (C-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-03-25 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 45/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-03-25. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Mao safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Mao has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100 (C-). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-03-25).
What is Mao's trust score?
Mao has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.0/100, earning a C- grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Mao?
Mao's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Mao and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | Rust Crates |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Crates by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Mao
What is Mao?
Mao is a Rust crate — Dev tool.
How to Verify Safety
Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=mao
Key Safety Concerns for Rust crate
When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.
Measured Signals
Mao has a Nerq Trust Score of 53/100 (C-). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Mao has a Trust Score of 53/100 (C-).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Mao Safe?
What is Mao's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Mao?
Does Mao have known vulnerabilities?
Does Mao use unsafe code?
Popular in Rust Crates
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.