Is Random Names Safe?

Random Names — Nerq Trust Score 48.2/100 (D grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-03-25

Random Names is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-03-25 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-03-25. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Random Names safe?

Trust Score Breakdown — Random Names has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-03-25).

Security Analysis → Random Names Privacy Report →

What is Random Names's trust score?

Random Names has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Random Names?

Random Names's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.

✓Security score: 90/100 (strong)
⚠Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

What is Random Names and who maintains it?

AuthorUnknown
CategoryRust Crates
SourceN/A

Similar Crates by Trust Score

lrtable (58)i-slint-backend-winit (58)pgrx-sql-entity-graph (58)myutil (58)rlua (58)
See all safest Crates →

Compare

Random Names vs lrtableRandom Names vs i-slint-backend-winitRandom Names vs pgrx-sql-entity-graph

Safety Guide: Random Names

What is Random Names?

Random Names is a Rust crate — Simple random names that can be used to name components for log files etc..

How to Verify Safety

Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=random-names

Key Safety Concerns for Rust crate

When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.

Measured Signals

Random Names has a Nerq Trust Score of 48/100 (D). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Random Names Safe?
random-names with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100).
What is Random Names's trust score?
random-names: 48.2/100 (D). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=random-names
What are safer alternatives to Random Names?
In the Rust Crates category, more Rust crates are being analyzed — check back soon. random-names scores 48.2/100.
Does Random Names have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Random Names against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Does Random Names use unsafe code?
Check Random Names's crate documentation for unsafe code usage. Trust score: 48.2/100. Fewer unsafe blocks generally indicates better memory safety.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Browse Categories

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy