Is Re Safe?

Re — Nerq Trust Score 46.2/100 (D grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-04-01.

Exercise caution with Re. Re is a Rust crate (error like anyhow for axum) with a Nerq Trust Score of 46.2/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-04-01. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Re safe?

NO — USE WITH CAUTION — Re has a Nerq Trust Score of 46.2/100 (D). It has below-average trust signals with significant gaps in security, maintenance, or documentation. Not recommended for production use without thorough manual review and additional security measures.

Security Analysis → {name} Privacy Report →

What is Re's trust score?

Re has a Nerq Trust Score of 46.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Re?

Re's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

What is Re and who maintains it?

AuthorUnknown
Categorycrates
SourceN/A

Similar Crates by Trust Score

atty (56)l337 (55)br-pay (55)mago-semantics (55)geng-derive (55)
See all safest Crates →

Safety Guide: Re

What is Re?

Re is a Rust crate — error like anyhow for axum.

How to Verify Safety

Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=re

Key Safety Concerns for Rust crates

When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.

Trust Assessment

Re has a Nerq Trust Score of 46/100 (D) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Re safe to use?
Exercise caution. re has a Nerq Trust Score of 46.2/100 (D). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on security (90/100), popularity (0/100).
What is Re's trust score?
re: 46.2/100 (D). Score based on: security (90/100), popularity (0/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=re
What are safer alternatives to Re?
In the crates category, more Rust crates are being analyzed — check back soon. re scores 46.2/100.
Does Re have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Re against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Does Re use unsafe code?
Check Re's crate documentation for unsafe code usage. Trust score: 46.2/100. Fewer unsafe blocks generally indicates better memory safety.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Browse Categories

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy