Is Sibyl Safe?
Sibyl — Nerq Trust Score 58.0/100 (D grade). Score based on 5 independent trust signals.
Sibyl is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 58.0/100 (D). Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: n/a. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Sibyl safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Sibyl has a Nerq Trust Score of 58.0/100 (D). Measured across 1 independent trust signal.
What is Sibyl's trust score?
Sibyl has a Nerq Trust Score of 58.0/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Sibyl?
Sibyl's strongest signal is overall trust at 58.0/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Sibyl and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | Rust Crates |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Crates by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Sibyl
What is Sibyl?
Sibyl is a Rust crate — An OCI-based (synchronous or asynchronous) interface between Rust applications and Oracle databases.
How to Verify Safety
Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=sibyl
Key Safety Concerns for Rust crate
When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.
Measured Signals
Sibyl has a Nerq Trust Score of 58/100 (D). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Sibyl has a Trust Score of 58/100 (D).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Sibyl Safe?
What is Sibyl's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Sibyl?
Does Sibyl have known vulnerabilities?
Does Sibyl use unsafe code?
Popular in Rust Crates
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.