Is Ssh Licco Safe?

Ssh Licco — Nerq Trust Score 38.9/100 (E grade). Score based on 3 independent trust signals.

Ssh Licco is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 38.9/100 (E), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Maintenance: 0/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: n/a. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Ssh Licco safe?

Trust Score Breakdown — Ssh Licco has a Nerq Trust Score of 38.9/100 (E). Measured across 3 independent trust signals.

Security Analysis → Ssh Licco Privacy Report →

What is Ssh Licco's trust score?

Ssh Licco has a Nerq Trust Score of 38.9/100, earning a E grade. This score is based on 3 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Maintenance
0
Documentation
0
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Ssh Licco?

Ssh Licco's strongest signal is maintenance at 0/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.

Maintenance: 0/100 — low maintenance activity
Documentation: 0/100 — limited documentation
Popularity: 0/100 — 2 stars on pulsemcp

What is Ssh Licco and who maintains it?

Authorhttps://github.com/echoqili/ssh-licco
CategoryDevops
Stars2
Sourcehttps://github.com/echoqili/ssh-licco

Popular Alternatives in devops

ansible/ansible
74.9/100 · B
github
FlowiseAI/Flowise
71.5/100 · B
github
shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code
76.1/100 · B
github
continuedev/continue
79.0/100 · B
github
wshobson/agents
69.0/100 · B-
github

What Is Ssh Licco?

Ssh Licco is a DevOps tool: SSH Licco enables remote server management with SSH, SFTP, Docker, and audit logging.. It has 2 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 39/100 (E).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.

How Nerq Assesses Ssh Licco's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Ssh Licco performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 38.9/100 (E) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates Ssh Licco?

Ssh Licco is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: Ssh Licco's measured signals (maintenance 0/100, documentation 0/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify Ssh Licco's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Ssh Licco's dependency tree.
  3. Review permissions — Understand what access Ssh Licco requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Ssh Licco in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=SSH Licco
  6. Review the license — Confirm that Ssh Licco's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Ssh Licco

When evaluating whether Ssh Licco is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Ssh Licco processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Ssh Licco's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Ssh Licco. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Ssh Licco connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Ssh Licco's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Ssh Licco in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using Ssh Licco Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Ssh Licco while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Ssh Licco is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Ssh Licco and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Ssh Licco only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Ssh Licco's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Ssh Licco is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Ssh Licco

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Ssh Licco's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare Ssh Licco's measured trust score of 38.9/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Ssh Licco is suitable for any particular use.

How Ssh Licco Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among DevOps tools, the average Trust Score is 63/100. Ssh Licco's score of 38.9/100 is below the category average of 63/100.

This suggests that Ssh Licco trails behind many comparable DevOps tools. Organizations with strict security requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Ssh Licco and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Ssh Licco's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Ssh Licco's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=SSH Licco&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Ssh Licco are strengthening or weakening over time.

Ssh Licco vs Alternatives

In the devops category, Ssh Licco scores 38.9/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Ssh Licco Safe?
SSH Licco with a Nerq Trust Score of 38.9/100 (E). Strongest signal: maintenance (0/100). Score based on Maintenance (0/100), Popularity (0/100), Documentation (0/100).
What is Ssh Licco's trust score?
SSH Licco: 38.9/100 (E). Score based on Maintenance (0/100), Popularity (0/100), Documentation (0/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=SSH Licco
What are safer alternatives to Ssh Licco?
In the Devops category, higher-rated alternatives include ansible/ansible (75/100), FlowiseAI/Flowise (72/100), shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code (76/100). SSH Licco scores 38.9/100.
How often is Ssh Licco's safety score updated?
Nerq recomputes Ssh Licco's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 38.9/100 (E). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=SSH Licco
Can I use Ssh Licco in a regulated environment?
Ssh Licco: 38.9/100 (E). Compliance signals are shown in the breakdown above. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy