Is Trading 212 Safe?
Trading 212 — Nerq Trust Score 59.0/100 (C grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12
Trading 212 is a iOS app with a Nerq Trust Score of 59.0/100 (C), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12 Security: 70/100. Popularity: 60/100. Data sourced from App Store metadata, privacy labels, permissions analysis, and developer history. Last updated: 2026-04-12. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Trading 212 safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Trading 212 has a Nerq Trust Score of 59.0/100 (C). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-04-12).
What is Trading 212's trust score?
Trading 212 has a Nerq Trust Score of 59.0/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Trading 212?
Trading 212's strongest signal is security at 70/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Trading 212 and who maintains it?
| Author | Trading 212 |
| Category | iOS Apps |
| Source | N/A |
Trading 212 Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
Similar Ios by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Trading 212
What is Trading 212?
Trading 212 is a iOS app — UK's #1 app for active trading & long-term investing.* (75% of retail CFD accounts lose money when trading with this provider) Access global financial markets commission-free and hassle-free. Start wi.
How to Verify Safety
Check App Store privacy labels. Review permissions. Look up developer.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=Trading 212
Key Safety Concerns for iOS app
When evaluating any iOS app, watch for: excessive permissions, data collection, in-app purchases, age appropriateness.
Measured Signals
Trading 212 has a Nerq Trust Score of 59/100 (C). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Trading 212 has a Trust Score of 59/100 (C).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 70/100 |
| Maintenance | 60/100 |
| Popularity | 60/100 |
| Quality | 50/100 |
| Community | 50/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from App Store metadata, privacy labels, permissions analysis, and developer history.
What data does Trading 212 collect?
Privacy assessment for Trading 212 is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.
Is Trading 212 secure?
Security score: 70/100 (0-100, higher = fewer measured security issues).
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Trading 212 Security Report
Trading 212 Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
How we calculated this score
Trading 212's trust score of 59.0/100 (C) is computed from App Store metadata, privacy labels, permissions analysis, and developer history. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (70/100), maintenance (60/100), popularity (60/100), quality (50/100), community (50/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
Signals last measured on April 12, 2026. Data version: 0.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Trading 212 Safe?
What is Trading 212's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Trading 212?
Is Trading 212 safe for kids?
Does Trading 212 collect my data?
Popular in iOS Apps
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.