Is Tree Sitter Languages Safe?

Tree Sitter Languages — Nerq Trust Score 66.8/100 (B- grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-08-11

Tree Sitter Languages is a Python package with a Nerq Trust Score of 66.8/100 (B-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-08-11 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 90/100. Data sourced from PyPI registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-08-11. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Tree Sitter Languages safe?

Trust Score Breakdown — Tree Sitter Languages has a Nerq Trust Score of 66.8/100 (B-). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-08-11).

Security Analysis → Tree Sitter Languages Privacy Report →

What is Tree Sitter Languages's trust score?

Tree Sitter Languages has a Nerq Trust Score of 66.8/100, earning a B- grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
90

What are the key security findings for Tree Sitter Languages?

Tree Sitter Languages's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 90/100 — community adoption

What is Tree Sitter Languages and who maintains it?

AuthorGrant Jenks
CategoryPython Packages
SourceN/A

Similar Pypi by Trust Score

asn1crypto (76)azure-common (76)bitarray (76)azure-keyvault-keys (76)asyncssh (76)
See all safest Pypi →

Compare

Tree Sitter Languages vs asn1cryptoTree Sitter Languages vs azure-commonTree Sitter Languages vs bitarray

Safety Guide: Tree Sitter Languages

What is Tree Sitter Languages?

Tree Sitter Languages is a Python package — Binary Python wheels for all tree sitter languages..

How to Verify Safety

Run pip audit or safety check. Review on PyPI for download stats.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=tree-sitter-languages

Key Safety Concerns for Python package

When evaluating any Python package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, malicious uploads, maintenance status.

Measured Signals

Tree Sitter Languages has a Nerq Trust Score of 67/100 (B-). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Tree Sitter Languages Safe?
tree-sitter-languages with a Nerq Trust Score of 66.8/100 (B-). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (90/100).
What is Tree Sitter Languages's trust score?
tree-sitter-languages: 66.8/100 (B-). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (90/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=tree-sitter-languages
What are safer alternatives to Tree Sitter Languages?
In the Python Packages category, more Python packages are being analyzed — check back soon. tree-sitter-languages scores 66.8/100.
Does Tree Sitter Languages have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Tree Sitter Languages against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Is Tree Sitter Languages actively maintained?
Tree Sitter Languages maintenance score: N/A. Check the repository for recent commit activity and issue responsiveness.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy