Is Tree Sitter Languages Safe?
Tree Sitter Languages — Nerq Trust Score 66.8/100 (B- grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-08-11
Tree Sitter Languages is a Python package with a Nerq Trust Score of 66.8/100 (B-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-08-11 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 90/100. Data sourced from PyPI registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-08-11. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Tree Sitter Languages safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Tree Sitter Languages has a Nerq Trust Score of 66.8/100 (B-). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-08-11).
What is Tree Sitter Languages's trust score?
Tree Sitter Languages has a Nerq Trust Score of 66.8/100, earning a B- grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Tree Sitter Languages?
Tree Sitter Languages's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Tree Sitter Languages and who maintains it?
| Author | Grant Jenks |
| Category | Python Packages |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Pypi by Trust Score
Compare
Safety Guide: Tree Sitter Languages
What is Tree Sitter Languages?
Tree Sitter Languages is a Python package — Binary Python wheels for all tree sitter languages..
How to Verify Safety
Run pip audit or safety check. Review on PyPI for download stats.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=tree-sitter-languages
Key Safety Concerns for Python package
When evaluating any Python package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, malicious uploads, maintenance status.
Measured Signals
Tree Sitter Languages has a Nerq Trust Score of 67/100 (B-). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Tree Sitter Languages has a Trust Score of 67/100 (B-).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Tree Sitter Languages Safe?
What is Tree Sitter Languages's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Tree Sitter Languages?
Does Tree Sitter Languages have known vulnerabilities?
Is Tree Sitter Languages actively maintained?
Popular in Python Packages
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.