Is Tree Sitter Languages Safe?

Tree Sitter Languages — Nerq Trust Score 66.8/100 (B- grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is generally safe but has some concerns. Last updated: 2026-07-30.

Use Tree Sitter Languages with some caution. Tree Sitter Languages is a Python package with a Nerq Trust Score of 66.8/100 (B-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 90/100. Data sourced from PyPI registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-07-28. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Tree Sitter Languages safe?

CAUTION — Tree Sitter Languages has a Nerq Trust Score of 66.8/100 (B-). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Security Analysis → Tree Sitter Languages Privacy Report →

What is Tree Sitter Languages's trust score?

Tree Sitter Languages has a Nerq Trust Score of 66.8/100, earning a B- grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
90

What are the key security findings for Tree Sitter Languages?

Tree Sitter Languages's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 90/100 — community adoption

What is Tree Sitter Languages and who maintains it?

AuthorGrant Jenks
CategoryPython Packages
SourceN/A

Similar Pypi by Trust Score

asn1crypto (76)azure-common (76)bitarray (76)azure-keyvault-keys (76)asyncssh (76)
See all safest Pypi →

Compare

Tree Sitter Languages vs asn1cryptoTree Sitter Languages vs azure-commonTree Sitter Languages vs bitarray

Safety Guide: Tree Sitter Languages

What is Tree Sitter Languages?

Tree Sitter Languages is a Python package — Binary Python wheels for all tree sitter languages..

How to Verify Safety

Run pip audit or safety check. Review on PyPI for download stats.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=tree-sitter-languages

Key Safety Concerns for Python package

When evaluating any Python package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, malicious uploads, maintenance status.

Trust Assessment

Tree Sitter Languages has a Nerq Trust Score of 67/100 (B-) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Tree Sitter Languages Safe?
Use with some caution. tree-sitter-languages with a Nerq Trust Score of 66.8/100 (B-). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (90/100).
What is Tree Sitter Languages's trust score?
tree-sitter-languages: 66.8/100 (B-). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (90/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=tree-sitter-languages
What are safer alternatives to Tree Sitter Languages?
In the Python Packages category, more Python packages are being analyzed — check back soon. tree-sitter-languages scores 66.8/100.
Does Tree Sitter Languages have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Tree Sitter Languages against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Is Tree Sitter Languages actively maintained?
Tree Sitter Languages maintenance score: N/A. Check the repository for recent commit activity and issue responsiveness.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy