Is Wide Literals Safe?

Wide Literals — Nerq Trust Score 48.2/100 (D grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-03-25

Wide Literals is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-03-25 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-03-25. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Wide Literals safe?

Trust Score Breakdown — Wide Literals has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-03-25).

Security Analysis → Wide Literals Privacy Report →

What is Wide Literals's trust score?

Wide Literals has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Wide Literals?

Wide Literals's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.

✓Security score: 90/100 (strong)
⚠Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

What is Wide Literals and who maintains it?

AuthorUnknown
CategoryRust Crates
SourceN/A

Similar Crates by Trust Score

lrtable (58)i-slint-backend-winit (58)pgrx-sql-entity-graph (58)myutil (58)rlua (58)
See all safest Crates →

Compare

Wide Literals vs lrtableWide Literals vs i-slint-backend-winitWide Literals vs pgrx-sql-entity-graph

Safety Guide: Wide Literals

What is Wide Literals?

Wide Literals is a Rust crate — UTF-16 string literals for use with wide string APIs accepting pointers to null-terminated strings.

How to Verify Safety

Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=wide-literals

Key Safety Concerns for Rust crate

When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.

Measured Signals

Wide Literals has a Nerq Trust Score of 48/100 (D). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Wide Literals Safe?
wide-literals with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100).
What is Wide Literals's trust score?
wide-literals: 48.2/100 (D). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=wide-literals
What are safer alternatives to Wide Literals?
In the Rust Crates category, more Rust crates are being analyzed — check back soon. wide-literals scores 48.2/100.
Does Wide Literals have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Wide Literals against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Does Wide Literals use unsafe code?
Check Wide Literals's crate documentation for unsafe code usage. Trust score: 48.2/100. Fewer unsafe blocks generally indicates better memory safety.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Browse Categories

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy