Är 35079 säker?

35079 — Nerq Trust Score 37.9/100 (Betyg E). Baserat på analys av 5 tillitsdimensioner bedöms det som har betydande säkerhetsrisker. Senast uppdaterad: 2026-04-27.

Var försiktig med 35079. 35079 är en programvara med ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 37.9/100 (E). Under Nerqs verifierade tröskel Data hämtad från flera offentliga källor inklusive paketregister, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev och OpenSSF Scorecard. Senast uppdaterad: 2026-04-27. Maskinläsbar data (JSON).

Är 35079 säker?

NO — USE WITH CAUTION — 35079 has a Nerq Trust Score of 37.9/100 (E). Har lägre än genomsnittliga förtroendesignaler med betydande luckor in säkerhet, underhåll, or dokumentation. Not recommended for production use without thorough manual review and additional säkerhet measures.

Säkerhetsanalys → 35079 integritetsrapport →

Vad är 35079s förtroendepoäng?

35079 har ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 37.9/100 med betyget E. Denna poäng baseras på 5 oberoende mätta dimensioner inklusive säkerhet, underhåll och communityanvändning.

Övergripande förtroende
37.9

Vilka är de viktigaste säkerhetsresultaten för 35079?

35079s starkaste signal är övergripande förtroende på 37.9/100. Inga kända sårbarheter har upptäckts. Har ännu inte nått Nerqs verifieringströskel på 70+.

Sammansatt förtroendepoäng: 37.9/100 utifrån alla tillgängliga signaler

Vad är 35079 och vem underhåller det?

Utvecklare0x48608cb0aab7743521967c03af27a7b9b34c7350
KategoriUncategorized
Källahttps://8004scan.io/agents/35079

What Is 35079?

35079 is a programvara in the uncategorized category: 73485774362470656138915434611960110833069915140135418354118876359855. Nerq Trust Score: 38/100 (E).

Nerq independently analyzes every programvara, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including säkerhet vulnerabilities, underhåll activity, license regelefterlevnad, and communityanvändning.

How Nerq Assesses 35079's Safety

Nerq evaluates every programvara across 13+ independent trust signals drawn from public sources including GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, OpenSSF Scorecard, and package registries. These signals are grouped into five core dimensioner: Säkerhet (known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, säkerhet policies), Underhåll (commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times), Documentation (README quality, API docs, examples), Compliance (license, regulatory alignment across 52 jurisdiktions), and Community (stars, forks, downloads, ecosystem integrations).

35079 receives an overall Trust Score of 37.9/100 (E), which Nerq considers low. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Nerq updates trust scores continuously as new data becomes available. To get the latest assessment, query the API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=35079

Each dimension is weighted according to its importance for the tool's category. For example, Säkerhet and Underhåll carry higher weight for tools that handle sensitive data or execute code, while Community and Documentation are weighted more heavily for developer-facing libraries and frameworks. This ensures that 35079's score reflects the risks most relevant to its actual usage patterns. The final score is a weighted average across all five dimensioner, normalized to a 0-100 scale with letter grades from A (highest) to F (lowest).

Who Should Use 35079?

35079 is designed for:

Risk guidance: We recommend caution with 35079. The low trust score suggests potential risks in säkerhet, underhåll, or community support. Consider using a more established alternative for any production or sensitive workload.

How to Verify 35079's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any programvara:

  1. Check the source code — Granska repository säkerhet policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active underhåll.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in 35079's dependency tree.
  3. Recension permissions — Understand what access 35079 requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run 35079 in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=35079
  6. Granska license — Confirm that 35079's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses säkerhet concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with 35079

When evaluating whether 35079 is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how 35079 processes, stores, and transmits your data. Granska tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency säkerhet

Check 35079's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher säkerhet risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to 35079. Säkerhet patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If 35079 connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP regelefterlevnad

Verify that 35079's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using 35079 in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using 35079 Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from 35079 while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how 35079 is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and regelefterlevnad with your säkerhet policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure 35079 and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from säkerhet patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant 35079 only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for säkerhet advisories

Subscribe to 35079's säkerhet advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how 35079 is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid 35079?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding 35079 in these scenarios:

For each scenario, evaluate whether 35079's trust score of 37.9/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual säkerhet assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How 35079 Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million programvaras, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among uncategorized tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. 35079's score of 37.9/100 is below the category average of 62/100.

This suggests that 35079 trails behind many comparable uncategorized tools. Organizations with strict säkerhet requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks måttlig in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors 35079 and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or underhåll patterns change, 35079's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to säkerhet and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced underhåll, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track 35079's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=35079&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — säkerhet, underhåll, dokumentation, regelefterlevnad, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of 35079 are strengthening or weakening over time.

Viktigaste slutsatser

Vilka data samlar 35079 in?

Integritet assessment for 35079 is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.

Är 35079 säker?

Säkerhetspoäng: under granskning. Review säkerhet practices and consider alternatives with higher säkerhet scores for sensitive use cases.

Nerq övervakar denna entitet mot NVD, OSV.dev och registerspecifika sårbarhetsdatabaser för löpande säkerhetsbedömning.

Fullständig analys: 35079 säkerhetsrapport

Så beräknade vi denna poäng

35079's trust score of 37.9/100 (E) beräknas utifrån flera offentliga källor inklusive paketregister, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev och OpenSSF Scorecard. Poängen speglar 0 oberoende dimensioner: . Varje dimension ges lika vikt för att producera den sammansatta förtroendepoängen.

Nerq analyserar över 7,5 miljoner entiteter i 26 register med samma metodik, vilket möjliggör direkt jämförelse mellan entiteter. Poäng uppdateras löpande när ny data finns tillgänglig.

Den här sidan granskades senast April 27, 2026. Dataversion: 1.0.

Fullständig metodikdokumentation · Maskinläsbar data (JSON API)

Vanliga frågor

Är 35079 säker?
Var försiktig. 35079 med ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 37.9/100 (E). Starkaste signalen: övergripande förtroende (37.9/100). Poäng baserad på multiple trust dimensioner.
Vad är 35079s förtroendepoäng?
35079: 37.9/100 (E). Poäng baserad på multiple trust dimensioner. Poäng uppdateras när ny data finns tillgänglig. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=35079
Vilka är säkrare alternativ till 35079?
I kategorin Uncategorized, fler programvara analyseras — kom tillbaka snart. 35079 scores 37.9/100.
Hur ofta uppdateras 35079s säkerhetspoäng?
Nerq continuously monitors 35079 and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 37.9/100 (E), last verifierad 2026-04-27. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=35079
Kan jag använda 35079 i en reglerad miljö?
35079 har inte nått Nerqs verifieringsgräns på 70. Ytterligare granskning rekommenderas.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Se även

Disclaimer: Nerqs förtroendepoäng är automatiserade bedömningar baserade på offentligt tillgängliga signaler. De utgör inte rekommendationer eller garantier. Gör alltid din egen verifiering.

Vi använder cookies för analys och cachelagring. Integritet