Är Databricks Code Assist säker?
Databricks Code Assist — Nerq Förtroendepoäng 64.9/100 (Betyg C). Baserat på analys av 5 tillitsdimensioner bedöms det som generellt säkert men med vissa farhågor. Senast uppdaterad: 2026-04-01.
Använd Databricks Code Assist med försiktighet. Databricks Code Assist is a software tool med ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 64.9/100 (C), based on 5 independent data dimensions. Ligger under den rekommenderade gränsen på 70. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-04-01. Maskinläsbar data (JSON).
Är Databricks Code Assist säker?
VAR FÖRSIKTIG — Databricks Code Assist har ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 64.9/100 (C). Har måttliga förtroendesignaler men uppvisar vissa oroande områden. Lämplig för utvecklingsanvändning — granska säkerhets- och underhållssignaler innan produktionsdriftsättning.
Vad är Databricks Code Assists förtroendepoäng?
Databricks Code Assist har ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 64.9/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
Vilka är de viktigaste säkerhetsresultaten för Databricks Code Assist?
Databricks Code Assist's strongest signal is regelefterlevnad at 87/100. No kända sårbarheter have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
Vad är Databricks Code Assist och vem underhåller det?
| Utvecklare | marcjimz |
| Kategori | coding |
| Källa | https://github.com/marcjimz/databricks-code-assist |
| Frameworks | anthropic |
| Protocols | rest |
Regelefterlevnad
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 87/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Populära alternativ inom coding
What Is Databricks Code Assist?
Databricks Code Assist is a software tool in the coding category: CLI tool for setting up AI coding assistants with Databricks.. Nerq Förtroendepoäng: 65/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.
How Nerq Assesses Databricks Code Assist's Safety
Nerq's Förtroendepoäng is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Databricks Code Assist performs in each:
- Säkerhet (0/100): Databricks Code Assist's security posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Underhåll (1/100): Databricks Code Assist is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (87/100): Databricks Code Assist is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Based on GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Förtroendepoäng of 64.9/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Databricks Code Assist?
Databricks Code Assist is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with coding tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Databricks Code Assist is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Databricks Code Assist's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for kända sårbarheter in Databricks Code Assist's dependency tree. - Recension permissions — Understand what access Databricks Code Assist requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Databricks Code Assist in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=databricks-code-assist - Granska license — Confirm that Databricks Code Assist's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Databricks Code Assist
When evaluating whether Databricks Code Assist is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Databricks Code Assist processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Databricks Code Assist's dependency tree for kända sårbarheter. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Databricks Code Assist. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Databricks Code Assist connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Databricks Code Assist's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Databricks Code Assist in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Databricks Code Assist and the EU AI Act
Databricks Code Assist is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's compliance assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal compliance.
Best Practices for Using Databricks Code Assist Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Databricks Code Assist while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Databricks Code Assist is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Databricks Code Assist and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Databricks Code Assist only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Databricks Code Assist's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Databricks Code Assist is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Databricks Code Assist?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Databricks Code Assist in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional compliance review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Databricks Code Assist är 64.9/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Databricks Code Assist Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Förtroendepoäng is 62/100. Databricks Code Assist's score of 64.9/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Databricks Code Assist favorably among coding tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensions.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Förtroendepoäng History
Nerq continuously monitors Databricks Code Assist and recalculates its Förtroendepoäng as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Databricks Code Assist's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Databricks Code Assist's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=databricks-code-assist&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Databricks Code Assist are strengthening or weakening over time.
Databricks Code Assist vs Alternatives
In the coding category, Databricks Code Assist scores 64.9/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Databricks Code Assist vs AutoGPT — Förtroendepoäng: 74.7/100
- Databricks Code Assist vs ollama — Förtroendepoäng: 73.8/100
- Databricks Code Assist vs langchain — Förtroendepoäng: 86.4/100
Viktigaste slutsatser
- Databricks Code Assist has a Förtroendepoäng of 64.9/100 (C) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Databricks Code Assist shows moderate trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among coding tools, Databricks Code Assist scores above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Vanliga frågor
Är Databricks Code Assist säker att använda?
Vad är Databricks Code Assist's trust score?
Vilka säkrare alternativ finns till Databricks Code Assist?
How often is Databricks Code Assist's safety score updated?
Kan jag använda Databricks Code Assist i en reglerad miljö?
Disclaimer: Nerqs förtroendepoäng är automatiserade bedömningar baserade på offentligt tillgängliga signaler. De utgör inte rekommendationer eller garantier. Gör alltid din egen verifiering.