Är Open Claw Gate säker?

Open Claw Gate — Nerq Trust Score 51.7/100 (Betyg D). Poäng baserad på 5 independent trust signals.

Open Claw Gate är en programvara med ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 51.7/100 (D), baserat på 5 oberoende datadimensioner. Säkerhet: 0/100. Underhåll: 1/100. Popularitet: 0/100. Data hämtad från flera offentliga källor inklusive paketregister, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev och OpenSSF Scorecard. Senast uppdaterad: n/a. Maskinläsbar data (JSON).

Är Open Claw Gate säker?

Förtroendepoäng i detalj — Open Claw Gate has a Nerq Trust Score of 51.7/100 (D). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.

Säkerhetsanalys → Open Claw Gate integritetsrapport →

Vad är Open Claw Gates förtroendepoäng?

Open Claw Gate har ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 51.7/100 med betyget D. Denna poäng baseras på 5 oberoende mätta dimensioner inklusive säkerhet, underhåll och communityanvändning.

Säkerhet
0
Regelefterlevnad
96
Underhåll
1
Dokumentation
1
Popularitet
0

Vilka är de viktigaste säkerhetsresultaten för Open Claw Gate?

Open Claw Gates starkaste signal är regelefterlevnad på 96/100. Inga kända sårbarheter har upptäckts.

⚠Säkerhetspoäng: 0/100 (svag)
⚠Underhåll: 1/100 — låg underhållsaktivitet
⚠Regelefterlevnad: 96/100 — covers 49 of 52 jurisdiktions
⚠Dokumentation: 1/100 — begränsad dokumentation
⚠Popularitet: 0/100 — community-antagande

Vad är Open Claw Gate och vem underhåller det?

UtvecklareKelberwitz
KategoriDevops
Källahttps://github.com/Kelberwitz/Open-Claw-Gate
Frameworksanthropic
Protocolsrest

Regelefterlevnad

EU AI Act Risk ClassMINIMAL
Compliance Score96/100
JurisdiktionsAssessed across 52 jurisdiktions

Populära alternativ inom devops

ansible/ansible
74.9/100 · B
github
FlowiseAI/Flowise
67.5/100 · C
github
shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code
72.1/100 · B
github
continuedev/continue
75.0/100 · B
github
wshobson/agents
79.3/100 · B
github

What Is Open Claw Gate?

Open Claw Gate is a DevOps tool: An SSH connection launcher for Windows with multi-instance management and OpenClaw tunnel support.. Nerq Trust Score: 52/100 (D).

Nerq independently analyzes every programvara, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including säkerhet vulnerabilities, underhåll activity, license regelefterlevnad, and communityanvändning.

How Nerq Assesses Open Claw Gate's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensioner. Here is how Open Claw Gate performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 51.7/100 (D) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates Open Claw Gate?

Open Claw Gate is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: Open Claw Gate's measured signals (säkerhet 0/100, underhåll 1/100, dokumentation 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify Open Claw Gate's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any programvara:

  1. Check the source code — Granska repository's säkerhet policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active underhåll.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Open Claw Gate's dependency tree.
  3. Recension permissions — Understand what access Open Claw Gate requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Open Claw Gate in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Open-Claw-Gate
  6. Granska license — Confirm that Open Claw Gate's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses säkerhet concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Open Claw Gate

When evaluating whether Open Claw Gate is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Open Claw Gate processes, stores, and transmits your data. Granska tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency säkerhet

Check Open Claw Gate's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher säkerhet risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Open Claw Gate. Säkerhet patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Open Claw Gate connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP regelefterlevnad

Verify that Open Claw Gate's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Open Claw Gate in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Open Claw Gate and the EU AI Act

Open Claw Gate is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.

Nerq's regelefterlevnad assessment covers 52 jurisdiktions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal regelefterlevnad.

Best Practices for Using Open Claw Gate Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Open Claw Gate while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Open Claw Gate is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and regelefterlevnad with your säkerhet policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Open Claw Gate and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from säkerhet patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Open Claw Gate only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for säkerhet advisories

Subscribe to Open Claw Gate's säkerhet advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Open Claw Gate is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Oberoende Review of Open Claw Gate

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Open Claw Gate's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare Open Claw Gate's measured trust score of 51.7/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Open Claw Gate is suitable for any particular use.

How Open Claw Gate Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million programvaras, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among DevOps tools, the average Trust Score is 63/100. Open Claw Gate's score of 51.7/100 is below the category average of 63/100.

This suggests that Open Claw Gate trails behind many comparable DevOps tools. Organizations with strict säkerhet requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks måttlig in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Open Claw Gate and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or underhåll patterns change, Open Claw Gate's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to säkerhet and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced underhåll, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Open Claw Gate's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Open-Claw-Gate&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — säkerhet, underhåll, dokumentation, regelefterlevnad, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Open Claw Gate are strengthening or weakening over time.

Open Claw Gate vs Alternativ

In the devops category, Open Claw Gate scores 51.7/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Viktigaste slutsatser

Vanliga frågor

Är Open Claw Gate säker?
Open-Claw-Gate med ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 51.7/100 (D). Starkaste signalen: regelefterlevnad (96/100). Poäng baserad på Säkerhet (0/100), Underhåll (1/100), Popularitet (0/100), Dokumentation (1/100).
Vad är Open Claw Gates förtroendepoäng?
Open-Claw-Gate: 51.7/100 (D). Poäng baserad på Säkerhet (0/100), Underhåll (1/100), Popularitet (0/100), Dokumentation (1/100). Compliance: 96/100. Poäng uppdateras när ny data finns tillgänglig. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Open-Claw-Gate
Vilka är säkrare alternativ till Open Claw Gate?
I kategorin Devops, higher-rated alternatives include ansible/ansible (75/100), FlowiseAI/Flowise (68/100), shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code (72/100). Open-Claw-Gate scores 51.7/100.
Hur ofta uppdateras Open Claw Gates säkerhetspoäng?
Nerq recomputes Open Claw Gate's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 51.7/100 (D). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Open-Claw-Gate
Kan jag använda Open Claw Gate i en reglerad miljö?
Open Claw Gate: 51.7/100 (D). Compliance: 49 of 52 jurisdiktions. EU AI Act compliant. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Se även

Disclaimer: Nerqs förtroendepoäng är automatiserade bedömningar baserade på offentligt tillgängliga signaler. De utgör inte rekommendationer eller garantier. Gör alltid din egen verifiering.

Vi använder cookies för analys och cachelagring. Integritet