Är Openclaw Nik säker?
Openclaw Nik — Nerq Trust Score 72.6/100 (Betyg B). Baserat på analys av 5 tillitsdimensioner bedöms det som generellt säkert men med vissa farhågor. Senast uppdaterad: 2026-06-18.
Ja, Openclaw Nik är säker att använda. Openclaw Nik är en programvara med ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 72.6/100 (B), baserat på 5 oberoende datadimensioner. Rekommenderas för användning. Säkerhet: 0/100. Underhåll: 1/100. Popularitet: 0/100. Data hämtad från flera offentliga källor inklusive paketregister, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev och OpenSSF Scorecard. Senast uppdaterad: 2026-06-18. Maskinläsbar data (JSON).
Är Openclaw Nik säker?
YES — Openclaw Nik has a Nerq Trust Score of 72.6/100 (B). Uppfyller Nerqs förtroendetröskel med starka signaler inom säkerhet, underhåll och communityanvändning. Rekommenderas för användning — se hela rapporten nedan för specifika överväganden.
Vad är Openclaw Niks förtroendepoäng?
Openclaw Nik har ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 72.6/100 med betyget B. Denna poäng baseras på 5 oberoende mätta dimensioner inklusive säkerhet, underhåll och communityanvändning.
Vilka är de viktigaste säkerhetsresultaten för Openclaw Nik?
Openclaw Niks starkaste signal är regelefterlevnad på 84/100. Inga kända sårbarheter har upptäckts. Uppfyller Nerqs verifieringströskel på 70+.
Vad är Openclaw Nik och vem underhåller det?
| Utvecklare | nvsudo |
| Kategori | Coding |
| Källa | https://github.com/nvsudo/openclaw-nik |
| Frameworks | anthropic |
| Protocols | rest |
Regelefterlevnad
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 84/100 |
| Jurisdiktions | Assessed across 52 jurisdiktions |
Populära alternativ inom coding
What Is Openclaw Nik?
Openclaw Nik is a programvara in the coding category: OpenClaw on Cloudflare Workers runs a personal AI assistant.. Nerq Trust Score: 73/100 (B).
Nerq independently analyzes every programvara, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including säkerhet vulnerabilities, underhåll activity, license regelefterlevnad, and communityanvändning.
How Nerq Assesses Openclaw Nik's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensioner. Here is how Openclaw Nik performs in each:
- Säkerhet (0/100): Openclaw Nik's säkerhet posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, säkerhet policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Underhåll (1/100): Openclaw Nik is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API dokumentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (84/100): Openclaw Nik is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdiktions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Baserad på GitHub-stjärnor, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 72.6/100 (B) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This exceeds the Nerq Verified threshold of 70, indicating the tool meets our standards for production use.
Who Should Use Openclaw Nik?
Openclaw Nik is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with coding tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Openclaw Nik meets the minimum threshold for production use, but we recommend monitoring for säkerhet advisories and keeping dependencies up to date. Consider implementing additional guardrails for sensitive workloads.
How to Verify Openclaw Nik's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any programvara:
- Check the source code — Granska repository's säkerhet policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active underhåll.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Openclaw Nik's dependency tree. - Recension permissions — Understand what access Openclaw Nik requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Openclaw Nik in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=openclaw-nik - Granska license — Confirm that Openclaw Nik's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses säkerhet concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Openclaw Nik
When evaluating whether Openclaw Nik is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Openclaw Nik processes, stores, and transmits your data. Granska tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Openclaw Nik's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher säkerhet risk.
Regularly check for updates to Openclaw Nik. Säkerhet patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Openclaw Nik connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Openclaw Nik's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Openclaw Nik in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Openclaw Nik and the EU AI Act
Openclaw Nik is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's regelefterlevnad assessment covers 52 jurisdiktions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal regelefterlevnad.
Best Practices for Using Openclaw Nik Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Openclaw Nik while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Openclaw Nik is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and regelefterlevnad with your säkerhet policies.
Ensure Openclaw Nik and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from säkerhet patches.
Grant Openclaw Nik only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Openclaw Nik's säkerhet advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Openclaw Nik is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Openclaw Nik?
Even well-trusted tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Openclaw Nik in these scenarios:
- Scenarios where Openclaw Nik's specific capabilities exceed your actual needs — simpler tools may be safer
- Air-gapped environments where the tool cannot receive säkerhet updates
- Projects with strict regulatory requirements that haven't been explicitly validated
For each scenario, evaluate whether Openclaw Nik's trust score of 72.6/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. The Nerq Verified status indicates general production readiness, but sector-specific requirements may apply.
How Openclaw Nik Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million programvaras, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Openclaw Nik's score of 72.6/100 is significantly above the category average of 62/100.
This places Openclaw Nik in the top tier of coding tools that Nerq tracks. Tools scoring this far above average typically demonstrate mature säkerhet practices, consistent release cadence, and broad communityanvändning.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks måttlig in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Openclaw Nik and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or underhåll patterns change, Openclaw Nik's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to säkerhet and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced underhåll, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Openclaw Nik's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=openclaw-nik&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — säkerhet, underhåll, dokumentation, regelefterlevnad, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Openclaw Nik are strengthening or weakening over time.
Openclaw Nik vs Alternativ
In the coding category, Openclaw Nik scores 72.6/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Openclaw Nik vs AutoGPT — Trust Score: 61.8/100
- Openclaw Nik vs ollama — Trust Score: 56.5/100
- Openclaw Nik vs langchain — Trust Score: 69.8/100
Viktigaste slutsatser
- Openclaw Nik has a Trust Score of 72.6/100 (B) and is Nerq Verified.
- Openclaw Nik meets the minimum threshold for production deployment, though monitoring and additional guardrails are recommended.
- Among coding tools, Openclaw Nik scores significantly above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Vanliga frågor
Är Openclaw Nik säker?
Vad är Openclaw Niks förtroendepoäng?
Vilka är säkrare alternativ till Openclaw Nik?
Hur ofta uppdateras Openclaw Niks säkerhetspoäng?
Kan jag använda Openclaw Nik i en reglerad miljö?
Se även
Disclaimer: Nerqs förtroendepoäng är automatiserade bedömningar baserade på offentligt tillgängliga signaler. De utgör inte rekommendationer eller garantier. Gör alltid din egen verifiering.