Är Openclaw Private säker?
Openclaw Private — Nerq Trust Score 59.9/100 (Betyg D). Poäng baserad på 5 independent trust signals.
Openclaw Private är en programvara med ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 59.9/100 (D), baserat på 5 oberoende datadimensioner. Säkerhet: 0/100. Underhåll: 1/100. Popularitet: 0/100. Data hämtad från flera offentliga källor inklusive paketregister, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev och OpenSSF Scorecard. Senast uppdaterad: n/a. Maskinläsbar data (JSON).
Är Openclaw Private säker?
Förtroendepoäng i detalj — Openclaw Private has a Nerq Trust Score of 59.9/100 (D). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.
Vad är Openclaw Privates förtroendepoäng?
Openclaw Private har ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 59.9/100 med betyget D. Denna poäng baseras på 5 oberoende mätta dimensioner inklusive säkerhet, underhåll och communityanvändning.
Vilka är de viktigaste säkerhetsresultaten för Openclaw Private?
Openclaw Privates starkaste signal är regelefterlevnad på 84/100. Inga kända sårbarheter har upptäckts.
Vad är Openclaw Private och vem underhåller det?
| Utvecklare | Lee-jaejin |
| Kategori | Infrastruktur |
| Stjärnor | 1 |
| Källa | https://github.com/Lee-jaejin/openclaw-private |
| Frameworks | ollama |
Regelefterlevnad
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 84/100 |
| Jurisdiktions | Assessed across 52 jurisdiktions |
Populära alternativ inom infrastructure
What Is Openclaw Private?
Openclaw Private is a programvara in the infrastructure category: Private setup for a self-hosted AI assistant with LLM and mesh VPN components.. It has 1 GitHub-stjärnor. Nerq Trust Score: 60/100 (D).
Nerq independently analyzes every programvara, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including säkerhet vulnerabilities, underhåll activity, license regelefterlevnad, and communityanvändning.
How Nerq Assesses Openclaw Private's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensioner. Here is how Openclaw Private performs in each:
- Säkerhet (0/100): Openclaw Private's säkerhet posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, säkerhet policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Underhåll (1/100): Openclaw Private is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API dokumentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (84/100): Openclaw Private is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdiktions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Baserad på GitHub-stjärnor, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 59.9/100 (D) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.
Who Typically Evaluates Openclaw Private?
Openclaw Private is commonly evaluated by:
- Developers and teams working with infrastructure tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
How to read the signals: Openclaw Private's measured signals (säkerhet 0/100, underhåll 1/100, dokumentation 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.
How to Verify Openclaw Private's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any programvara:
- Check the source code — Granska repository's säkerhet policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active underhåll.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Openclaw Private's dependency tree. - Recension permissions — Understand what access Openclaw Private requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Openclaw Private in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=openclaw-private - Granska license — Confirm that Openclaw Private's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses säkerhet concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Openclaw Private
When evaluating whether Openclaw Private is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Openclaw Private processes, stores, and transmits your data. Granska tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Openclaw Private's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher säkerhet risk.
Regularly check for updates to Openclaw Private. Säkerhet patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Openclaw Private connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Openclaw Private's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Openclaw Private in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Openclaw Private and the EU AI Act
Openclaw Private is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's regelefterlevnad assessment covers 52 jurisdiktions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal regelefterlevnad.
Best Practices for Using Openclaw Private Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Openclaw Private while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Openclaw Private is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and regelefterlevnad with your säkerhet policies.
Ensure Openclaw Private and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from säkerhet patches.
Grant Openclaw Private only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Openclaw Private's säkerhet advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Openclaw Private is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
Situations That Warrant Oberoende Review of Openclaw Private
Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Openclaw Private's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:
- Environments handling sensitive or regulated data (healthcare, finance, government)
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
- Deployments with strict regulatory requirements that must be independently validated
For each situation, compare Openclaw Private's measured trust score of 59.9/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Openclaw Private is suitable for any particular use.
How Openclaw Private Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million programvaras, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among infrastructure tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Openclaw Private's score of 59.9/100 is near the category average of 62/100.
This places Openclaw Private in line with the typical infrastructure tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks måttlig in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Openclaw Private and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or underhåll patterns change, Openclaw Private's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to säkerhet and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced underhåll, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Openclaw Private's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=openclaw-private&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — säkerhet, underhåll, dokumentation, regelefterlevnad, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Openclaw Private are strengthening or weakening over time.
Openclaw Private vs Alternativ
In the infrastructure category, Openclaw Private scores 59.9/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Openclaw Private vs n8n — Trust Score: 69.1/100
- Openclaw Private vs langflow — Trust Score: 77.0/100
- Openclaw Private vs dify — Trust Score: 69.7/100
Viktigaste slutsatser
- Openclaw Private has a measured Nerq Trust Score of 59.9/100 (D) — a composite of independent signals, not a suitability judgment.
- Among infrastructure tools, Openclaw Private scores near the category average of 62/100 (a positional measurement relative to peers).
- The individual signals — säkerhet, underhåll, dokumentation, regelefterlevnad, community — are shown above. Weigh them against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via Nerq's Preflight API.
Vanliga frågor
Är Openclaw Private säker?
Vad är Openclaw Privates förtroendepoäng?
Vilka är säkrare alternativ till Openclaw Private?
Hur ofta uppdateras Openclaw Privates säkerhetspoäng?
Kan jag använda Openclaw Private i en reglerad miljö?
Se även
Disclaimer: Nerqs förtroendepoäng är automatiserade bedömningar baserade på offentligt tillgängliga signaler. De utgör inte rekommendationer eller garantier. Gör alltid din egen verifiering.