Är Superdesign säker?

Superdesign — Nerq Trust Score 47.4/100 (Betyg D). Baserat på analys av 3 tillitsdimensioner bedöms det som har anmärkningsvärda säkerhetsproblem. Senast uppdaterad: 2026-04-23.

Var försiktig med Superdesign. Superdesign är en programvara med ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 47.4/100 (D), baserat på 3 oberoende datadimensioner. Under Nerqs verifierade tröskel Underhåll: 0/100. Popularitet: 0/100. Data hämtad från flera offentliga källor inklusive paketregister, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev och OpenSSF Scorecard. Senast uppdaterad: 2026-04-23. Maskinläsbar data (JSON).

Är Superdesign säker?

NO — USE WITH CAUTION — Superdesign has a Nerq Trust Score of 47.4/100 (D). Har lägre än genomsnittliga förtroendesignaler med betydande luckor in säkerhet, underhåll, or dokumentation. Not recommended for production use without thorough manual review and additional säkerhet measures.

Säkerhetsanalys → Superdesign integritetsrapport →

Vad är Superdesigns förtroendepoäng?

Superdesign har ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 47.4/100 med betyget D. Denna poäng baseras på 3 oberoende mätta dimensioner inklusive säkerhet, underhåll och communityanvändning.

Underhåll
0
Dokumentation
0
Popularitet
0

Vilka är de viktigaste säkerhetsresultaten för Superdesign?

Superdesigns starkaste signal är underhåll på 0/100. Inga kända sårbarheter har upptäckts. Har ännu inte nått Nerqs verifieringströskel på 70+.

Underhåll: 0/100 — låg underhållsaktivitet
Dokumentation: 0/100 — begränsad dokumentation
Popularitet: 0/100 — 68 stjärnor på pulsemcp

Vad är Superdesign och vem underhåller det?

Utvecklarehttps://github.com/jonthebeef/superdesign-mcp-claude-code
KategoriDesign
Stjärnor68
Källahttps://github.com/jonthebeef/superdesign-mcp-claude-code

Populära alternativ inom design

invoke-ai/InvokeAI
69.1/100 · B-
github
onlook-dev/onlook
72.3/100 · B
github
Figma Context
59.9/100 · C
pulsemcp
Anionex/banana-slides
69.4/100 · B-
github
creativetimofficial/ui
70.0/100 · B
github

What Is Superdesign?

Superdesign is a programvara in the design category: Superdesign integrates Superdesign's design orchestrator with Claude Code to generate UI designs and more through structured specifications.. It has 68 GitHub-stjärnor. Nerq Trust Score: 47/100 (D).

Nerq independently analyzes every programvara, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including säkerhet vulnerabilities, underhåll activity, license regelefterlevnad, and communityanvändning.

How Nerq Assesses Superdesign's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensioner. Here is how Superdesign performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 47.4/100 (D) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Who Should Use Superdesign?

Superdesign is designed for:

Risk guidance: We recommend caution with Superdesign. The low trust score suggests potential risks in säkerhet, underhåll, or community support. Consider using a more established alternative for any production or sensitive workload.

How to Verify Superdesign's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any programvara:

  1. Check the source code — Granska repository säkerhet policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active underhåll.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Superdesign's dependency tree.
  3. Recension permissions — Understand what access Superdesign requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Superdesign in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Superdesign
  6. Granska license — Confirm that Superdesign's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses säkerhet concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Superdesign

When evaluating whether Superdesign is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Superdesign processes, stores, and transmits your data. Granska tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency säkerhet

Check Superdesign's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher säkerhet risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Superdesign. Säkerhet patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Superdesign connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP regelefterlevnad

Verify that Superdesign's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Superdesign in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using Superdesign Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Superdesign while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Superdesign is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and regelefterlevnad with your säkerhet policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Superdesign and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from säkerhet patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Superdesign only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for säkerhet advisories

Subscribe to Superdesign's säkerhet advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Superdesign is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid Superdesign?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Superdesign in these scenarios:

For each scenario, evaluate whether Superdesign's trust score of 47.4/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual säkerhet assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How Superdesign Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million programvaras, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among design tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Superdesign's score of 47.4/100 is below the category average of 62/100.

This suggests that Superdesign trails behind many comparable design tools. Organizations with strict säkerhet requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks måttlig in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Superdesign and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or underhåll patterns change, Superdesign's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to säkerhet and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced underhåll, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Superdesign's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Superdesign&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — säkerhet, underhåll, dokumentation, regelefterlevnad, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Superdesign are strengthening or weakening over time.

Superdesign vs Alternativ

In the design category, Superdesign scores 47.4/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Viktigaste slutsatser

Detaljerad poänganalys

DimensionPoäng
Underhåll0/100
Popularitet0/100

Baserad på 2 dimensioner. Data från flera offentliga källor inklusive paketregister, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev och OpenSSF Scorecard.

Vilka data samlar Superdesign in?

Integritet assessment for Superdesign is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.

Är Superdesign säker?

Säkerhetspoäng: under granskning. Review säkerhet practices and consider alternatives with higher säkerhet scores for sensitive use cases.

Nerq övervakar denna entitet mot NVD, OSV.dev och registerspecifika sårbarhetsdatabaser för löpande säkerhetsbedömning.

Fullständig analys: Superdesign säkerhetsrapport

Så beräknade vi denna poäng

Superdesign's trust score of 47.4/100 (D) beräknas utifrån flera offentliga källor inklusive paketregister, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev och OpenSSF Scorecard. Poängen speglar 2 oberoende dimensioner: underhåll (0/100), popularitet (0/100). Varje dimension ges lika vikt för att producera den sammansatta förtroendepoängen.

Nerq analyserar över 7,5 miljoner entiteter i 26 register med samma metodik, vilket möjliggör direkt jämförelse mellan entiteter. Poäng uppdateras löpande när ny data finns tillgänglig.

Den här sidan granskades senast April 23, 2026. Dataversion: 1.0.

Fullständig metodikdokumentation · Maskinläsbar data (JSON API)

Vanliga frågor

Är Superdesign säker?
Var försiktig. Superdesign med ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 47.4/100 (D). Starkaste signalen: underhåll (0/100). Poäng baserad på Underhåll (0/100), Popularitet (0/100), Dokumentation (0/100).
Vad är Superdesigns förtroendepoäng?
Superdesign: 47.4/100 (D). Poäng baserad på Underhåll (0/100), Popularitet (0/100), Dokumentation (0/100). Poäng uppdateras när ny data finns tillgänglig. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Superdesign
Vilka är säkrare alternativ till Superdesign?
I kategorin Design, higher-rated alternatives include invoke-ai/InvokeAI (69/100), onlook-dev/onlook (72/100), Figma Context (60/100). Superdesign scores 47.4/100.
Hur ofta uppdateras Superdesigns säkerhetspoäng?
Nerq continuously monitors Superdesign and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 47.4/100 (D), last verifierad 2026-04-23. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Superdesign
Kan jag använda Superdesign i en reglerad miljö?
Superdesign har inte nått Nerqs verifieringsgräns på 70. Ytterligare granskning rekommenderas.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Se även

Disclaimer: Nerqs förtroendepoäng är automatiserade bedömningar baserade på offentligt tillgängliga signaler. De utgör inte rekommendationer eller garantier. Gör alltid din egen verifiering.

Vi använder cookies för analys och cachelagring. Integritet