Stillpoint ปลอดภัยหรือไม่?
Stillpoint — Nerq Trust Score 75.8/100 (เกรด B). จากการวิเคราะห์ 5 มิติความน่าเชื่อถือ ถือว่าโดยทั่วไปปลอดภัยแต่มีข้อกังวลบางประการ อัปเดตล่าสุด: 2026-04-02
ใช่ Stillpoint ปลอดภัยที่จะใช้งาน Stillpoint is a software tool ด้วยคะแนนความน่าเชื่อถือ Nerq 75.8/100 (B), based on 5 มิติข้อมูลอิสระ. It is recommended for use. ความปลอดภัย: 0/100. การบำรุงรักษา: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. ข้อมูลจาก multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. อัปเดตล่าสุด: 2026-04-02. ข้อมูลที่เครื่องอ่านได้ (JSON).
Stillpoint ปลอดภัยหรือไม่?
ใช่ — Stillpoint มีคะแนนความน่าเชื่อถือ Nerq 75.8/100 (B). ผ่านเกณฑ์ความน่าเชื่อถือของ Nerq ด้วยสัญญาณที่แข็งแกร่งในด้านความปลอดภัย การบำรุงรักษา และการยอมรับจากชุมชน. Recommended for use — ดูรายงานฉบับเต็มด้านล่างสำหรับข้อพิจารณาเฉพาะ.
คะแนนความน่าเชื่อถือของ Stillpoint คือเท่าไร?
Stillpoint มีคะแนนความน่าเชื่อถือ Nerq 75.8/100 ได้เกรด B คะแนนนี้อิงจาก 5 มิติที่วัดอย่างอิสระ
ผลการตรวจสอบความปลอดภัยหลักของ Stillpoint คืออะไร?
สัญญาณที่แข็งแกร่งที่สุดของ Stillpoint คือ การปฏิบัติตามกฎระเบียบ ที่ 100/100 ไม่พบช่องโหว่ที่ทราบ ผ่านเกณฑ์ Nerq Verified 70+
Stillpoint คืออะไรและใครเป็นผู้ดูแล?
| ผู้พัฒนา | grnwood |
| หมวดหมู่ | productivity |
| ดาว | 2 |
| แหล่งที่มา | https://github.com/grnwood/stillpoint |
| Frameworks | openai |
| Protocols | rest |
การปฏิบัติตามกฎระเบียบ
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
ทางเลือกยอดนิยมใน productivity
What Is Stillpoint?
Stillpoint is a software tool in the productivity category: StillPoint is a local-first workspace for organizing notes, tasks, and ideas with AI assistance.. It has 2 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 76/100 (B).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including ความปลอดภัย vulnerabilities, การบำรุงรักษา activity, license การปฏิบัติตามกฎระเบียบ, and การยอมรับจากชุมชน.
How Nerq Assesses Stillpoint's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five มิติ. Here is how Stillpoint performs in each:
- ความปลอดภัย (0/100): Stillpoint's ความปลอดภัย posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, ความปลอดภัย policy presence, and code signing practices.
- การบำรุงรักษา (1/100): Stillpoint is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API เอกสาร, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (100/100): Stillpoint is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. อิงจาก GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 75.8/100 (B) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This exceeds the Nerq Verified threshold of 70, indicating the tool meets our standards for production use.
Who Should Use Stillpoint?
Stillpoint is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with productivity tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Stillpoint meets the minimum threshold for production use, but we recommend monitoring for ความปลอดภัย advisories and keeping dependencies up to date. Consider implementing additional guardrails for sensitive workloads.
How to Verify Stillpoint's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — ตรวจสอบ repository's ความปลอดภัย policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active การบำรุงรักษา.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Stillpoint's dependency tree. - รีวิว permissions — Understand what access Stillpoint requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Stillpoint in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=stillpoint - ตรวจสอบ license — Confirm that Stillpoint's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses ความปลอดภัย concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Stillpoint
When evaluating whether Stillpoint is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Stillpoint processes, stores, and transmits your data. ตรวจสอบ tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Stillpoint's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher ความปลอดภัย risk.
Regularly check for updates to Stillpoint. ความปลอดภัย patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Stillpoint connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Stillpoint's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Stillpoint in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Stillpoint and the EU AI Act
Stillpoint is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's การปฏิบัติตามกฎระเบียบ assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal การปฏิบัติตามกฎระเบียบ.
Best Practices for Using Stillpoint Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Stillpoint while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Stillpoint is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and การปฏิบัติตามกฎระเบียบ with your ความปลอดภัย policies.
Ensure Stillpoint and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from ความปลอดภัย patches.
Grant Stillpoint only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Stillpoint's ความปลอดภัย advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Stillpoint is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Stillpoint?
Even well-trusted tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Stillpoint in these scenarios:
- Scenarios where Stillpoint's specific capabilities exceed your actual needs — simpler tools may be safer
- Air-gapped environments where the tool cannot receive ความปลอดภัย updates
- Projects with strict regulatory requirements that haven't been explicitly validated
For each scenario, evaluate whether Stillpoint 75.8/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. The Nerq Verified status indicates general production readiness, but sector-specific requirements may apply.
How Stillpoint Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among productivity tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Stillpoint's score of 75.8/100 is significantly above the category average of 62/100.
This places Stillpoint in the top tier of productivity tools that Nerq tracks. Tools scoring this far above average typically demonstrate mature ความปลอดภัย practices, consistent release cadence, and broad การยอมรับจากชุมชน.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks ปานกลาง in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Stillpoint and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or การบำรุงรักษา patterns change, Stillpoint's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to ความปลอดภัย and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced การบำรุงรักษา, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Stillpoint's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=stillpoint&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — ความปลอดภัย, การบำรุงรักษา, เอกสาร, การปฏิบัติตามกฎระเบียบ, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Stillpoint are strengthening or weakening over time.
Stillpoint vs ทางเลือก
ในหมวดหมู่ productivity, Stillpoint ได้คะแนน 75.8/100 It ranks among the top tools in its category. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Stillpoint vs cherry-studio — Trust Score: 84.5/100
- Stillpoint vs ToolJet — Trust Score: 90.9/100
- Stillpoint vs posthog — Trust Score: 74.7/100
ประเด็นสำคัญ
- Stillpoint มีคะแนนความน่าเชื่อถือ 75.8/100 (B) and is Nerq Verified.
- Stillpoint meets the minimum threshold for production deployment, though monitoring and additional guardrails are recommended.
- Among productivity tools, Stillpoint scores significantly above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
คำถามที่พบบ่อย
Stillpoint ปลอดภัยที่จะใช้งานหรือไม่?
Stillpoint คือเท่าไร?
ทางเลือกที่ปลอดภัยกว่า Stillpoint มีอะไรบ้าง?
How often is Stillpoint's safety score updated?
ฉันสามารถใช้ Stillpoint ในสภาพแวดล้อมที่มีการควบคุมหรือไม่?
Disclaimer: คะแนนความน่าเชื่อถือของ Nerq เป็นการประเมินอัตโนมัติจากสัญญาณที่เปิดเผยต่อสาธารณะ ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำหรือการรับประกัน กรุณาตรวจสอบด้วยตนเองเสมอ