Renfield có an toàn không?
Renfield — Nerq Điểm tin cậy 73.2/100 (Hạng B). Dựa trên phân tích 5 chiều tin cậy, được đánh giá là nhìn chung an toàn nhưng có một số lo ngại. Cập nhật lần cuối: 2026-04-02.
Có, Renfield an toàn để sử dụng. Renfield is a software tool với Điểm tin cậy Nerq là 73.2/100 (B), based on 5 tiêu chí dữ liệu độc lập. It is recommended for use. Bảo mật: 0/100. Bảo trì: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. Dữ liệu từ multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Cập nhật lần cuối: 2026-04-02. Dữ liệu máy đọc được (JSON).
Renfield có an toàn không?
CÓ — Renfield có Điểm tin cậy Nerq là 73.2/100 (B). Đạt ngưỡng tin cậy Nerq với tín hiệu mạnh về bảo mật, bảo trì và sự chấp nhận của cộng đồng. Recommended for use — xem báo cáo đầy đủ bên dưới để biết chi tiết.
Điểm tin cậy của Renfield là bao nhiêu?
Renfield có Điểm tin cậy Nerq là 73.2/100, earning a B grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured tiêu chí including bảo mật, bảo trì, and sự chấp nhận của cộng đồng.
Các phát hiện bảo mật chính của Renfield là gì?
Renfield's strongest signal is tuân thủ at 87/100. No lỗ hổng đã biết have been detected. It meets the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
Renfield là gì và ai duy trì nó?
| Nhà phát triển | ebongard |
| Danh mục | coding |
| Sao | 1 |
| Nguồn | https://github.com/ebongard/renfield |
| Frameworks | openai · anthropic · ollama |
| Protocols | mcp · rest · websocket |
Tuân thủ quy định
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 87/100 |
| Quyền Tài Pháns | Assessed across 52 quyền tài pháns |
Lựa chọn phổ biến trong coding
What Is Renfield?
Renfield is a software tool in the coding category: Self-hosted AI assistant with voice satellites, 100+ tool integrations, RAG knowledge base, and full offline capability.. It has 1 GitHub stars. Nerq Điểm tin cậy: 73/100 (B).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including bảo mật vulnerabilities, bảo trì activity, license tuân thủ, and sự chấp nhận của cộng đồng.
How Nerq Assesses Renfield's Safety
Nerq's Điểm tin cậy is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five tiêu chí. Here is how Renfield performs in each:
- Bảo mật (0/100): Renfield's bảo mật posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, bảo mật policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Bảo trì (1/100): Renfield is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API tài liệu, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (87/100): Renfield is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 quyền tài pháns including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Dựa trên GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Điểm tin cậy of 73.2/100 (B) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This exceeds the Nerq Verified threshold of 70, indicating the tool meets our standards for production use.
Who Should Use Renfield?
Renfield is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with coding tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Renfield meets the minimum threshold for production use, but we recommend monitoring for bảo mật advisories and keeping dependencies up to date. Consider implementing additional guardrails for sensitive workloads.
How to Verify Renfield's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Xem xét repository's bảo mật policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active bảo trì.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for lỗ hổng đã biết in Renfield's dependency tree. - Đánh giá permissions — Understand what access Renfield requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Renfield in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=renfield - Xem xét license — Confirm that Renfield's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses bảo mật concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Renfield
When evaluating whether Renfield is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Renfield processes, stores, and transmits your data. Xem xét tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Renfield's dependency tree for lỗ hổng đã biết. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher bảo mật risk.
Regularly check for updates to Renfield. Bảo mật patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Renfield connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Renfield's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Renfield in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Renfield and the EU AI Act
Renfield is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's tuân thủ assessment covers 52 quyền tài pháns worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal tuân thủ.
Best Practices for Using Renfield Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Renfield while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Renfield is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and tuân thủ with your bảo mật policies.
Ensure Renfield and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from bảo mật patches.
Grant Renfield only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Renfield's bảo mật advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Renfield is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Renfield?
Even well-trusted tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Renfield in these scenarios:
- Scenarios where Renfield's specific capabilities exceed your actual needs — simpler tools may be safer
- Air-gapped environments where the tool cannot receive bảo mật updates
- Projects with strict regulatory requirements that haven't been explicitly validated
For each scenario, evaluate whether Renfield là 73.2/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. The Nerq Verified status indicates general production readiness, but sector-specific requirements may apply.
How Renfield Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Điểm tin cậy is 62/100. Renfield's score of 73.2/100 is significantly above the category average of 62/100.
This places Renfield in the top tier of coding tools that Nerq tracks. Tools scoring this far above average typically demonstrate mature bảo mật practices, consistent release cadence, and broad sự chấp nhận của cộng đồng.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks trung bình in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Điểm tin cậy History
Nerq continuously monitors Renfield and recalculates its Điểm tin cậy as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or bảo trì patterns change, Renfield's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to bảo mật and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced bảo trì, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Renfield's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=renfield&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — bảo mật, bảo trì, tài liệu, tuân thủ, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Renfield are strengthening or weakening over time.
Renfield vs Lựa chọn thay thế
In the coding category, Renfield scores 73.2/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Renfield vs AutoGPT — Điểm tin cậy: 74.7/100
- Renfield vs ollama — Điểm tin cậy: 73.8/100
- Renfield vs langchain — Điểm tin cậy: 86.4/100
Điểm chính
- Renfield has a Điểm tin cậy of 73.2/100 (B) and is Nerq Verified.
- Renfield meets the minimum threshold for production deployment, though monitoring and additional guardrails are recommended.
- Among coding tools, Renfield scores significantly above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Câu hỏi thường gặp
Renfield có an toàn để sử dụng không?
Renfield's trust score là gì?
Các lựa chọn an toàn hơn Renfield là gì?
How often is Renfield's safety score updated?
Tôi có thể sử dụng Renfield trong môi trường quy định không?
Disclaimer: Điểm tin cậy Nerq là đánh giá tự động dựa trên tín hiệu công khai. Đây không phải khuyến nghị hay bảo đảm. Hãy luôn tự xác minh.