Was 96629 Hacked?
No Publicly Reported Incidents. As of April 2026, 96629 has no publicly reported security breaches, hacks, or CVE entries in the databases Nerq monitors. This covers the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), GitHub Security Advisories, and OSV.dev. Trust Score: 38/100 (E). Last checked: 2026-04-25.
No Publicly Reported Incidents
Security Incident Summary
| CVE Count | 0 |
|---|---|
| Critical CVEs | 0 |
| Breach Status | No Publicly Reported Incidents |
| Trust Score | 38/100 (E) |
| Publisher | 0xd3e2e8a1c257290281243e47eb540bc4d6cc7f6a |
| Registry | N/A |
What We Check
- National Vulnerability Database (NVD) — CVE entries for publicly disclosed vulnerabilities
- GitHub Security Advisories — security alerts for open-source dependencies
- OSV.dev — Google's open-source vulnerability database
- Public breach reports — media reports and incident disclosures
Full Trust Analysis
For a complete safety assessment including privacy, maintenance, and community trust signals, see 96629 Trust Score on Nerq.
FAQ
Has 96629 been hacked?
As of April 2026, 96629 has no publicly reported security breaches, hacks, or CVE entries in the databases Nerq monitors. This covers the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), GitHub Security Advisories, and OSV.dev.
How many CVEs does 96629 have?
96629 has 0 CVE entries (0 critical). CVEs are publicly disclosed vulnerabilities tracked by MITRE and the NVD.
Is 96629 safe to use after a breach?
With no reported breaches, 96629 appears safe based on available data.
Where can I check 96629's security history?
Nerq monitors NVD (nvd.nist.gov), GitHub Security Advisories, and OSV.dev for 96629. View the full trust analysis at nerq.ai/safe/96629.
Safe? Legit? Scam?
Spyware? Privacy Pros/Cons
Review What is it? Who owns?
Alternatives Use safely
Kids? Trending Leaderboard
Updated April 2026. Trust scores based on automated analysis.