Agent Plugins安全吗?

Agent Plugins — Nerq 信任评分 69.3/100 (C级). 基于5个信任维度的分析,被评估为总体安全但存在一些担忧。 最后更新:2026-04-02。

请谨慎使用Agent Plugins。 Agent Plugins is a software tool Nerq 信任评分为 69.3/100 (C), based on 5 独立数据维度. 低于推荐阈值 70。 安全性: 0/100. 维护: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. 数据来源于 multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. 最后更新: 2026-04-02. 机器可读数据(JSON).

Agent Plugins安全吗?

谨慎 — Agent Plugins Nerq 信任评分为 69.3/100 (C). 信任信号中等,但存在一些值得关注的方面. 适合用于开发环境 — 在生产部署前请查看安全性和维护信号.

安全分析 → {name}隐私报告 →

Agent Plugins的信任评分是多少?

Agent Plugins Nerq 信任评分为 69.3/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured 维度 including 安全性, 维护, and 社区采用.

安全性
0
合规性
100
维护
1
文档
1
人气
0

Agent Plugins的主要安全发现是什么?

Agent Plugins's strongest signal is 合规性 at 100/100. No 已知漏洞 have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

安全性 score: 0/100 (weak)
维护: 1/100 — 低维护活动
Compliance: 100/100 — covers 52 of 52 司法管辖区s
Documentation: 1/100 — 文档有限
Popularity: 0/100 — 1 在以下平台的星标 github

Agent Plugins是什么,谁在维护它?

开发者omarshahine
类别productivity
星标1
来源https://github.com/omarshahine/Agent-Plugins
Frameworksanthropic
Protocolsmcp · rest

合规性

EU AI Act Risk ClassMINIMAL
Compliance Score100/100
管辖权sAssessed across 52 司法管辖区s

productivity中的热门替代品

CherryHQ/cherry-studio
84.5/100 · A
github
ToolJet/ToolJet
90.9/100 · A+
github
PostHog/posthog
74.7/100 · B
github
claude-task-master
67.8/100 · C
mcp
iOfficeAI/AionUi
84.4/100 · A
github

Agent Plugins在其他平台

同一开发者/公司在其他注册表中:

fastmail-cli
58/100 · npm

What Is Agent Plugins?

Agent Plugins is a software tool in the productivity category: A plugin marketplace for enhancing productivity with various reusable plugins.. It has 1 GitHub stars. Nerq 信任评分: 69/100 (C).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including 安全性 vulnerabilities, 维护 activity, license 合规性, and 社区采用.

How Nerq Assesses Agent Plugins's Safety

Nerq's 信任评分 is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five 维度. Here is how Agent Plugins performs in each:

The overall 信任评分 of 69.3/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Who Should Use Agent Plugins?

Agent Plugins is designed for:

Risk guidance: Agent Plugins is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its 安全性 posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.

How to Verify Agent Plugins's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — 查看 repository's 安全性 policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active 维护.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for 已知漏洞 in Agent Plugins's dependency tree.
  3. 评论 permissions — Understand what access Agent Plugins requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Agent Plugins in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Agent-Plugins
  6. 查看 license — Confirm that Agent Plugins's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses 安全性 concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Agent Plugins

When evaluating whether Agent Plugins is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Agent Plugins processes, stores, and transmits your data. 查看 tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency 安全性

Check Agent Plugins's dependency tree for 已知漏洞. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher 安全性 risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Agent Plugins. 安全性 patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Agent Plugins connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP 合规性

Verify that Agent Plugins's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Agent Plugins in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Agent Plugins and the EU AI Act

Agent Plugins is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.

Nerq's 合规性 assessment covers 52 司法管辖区s worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal 合规性.

Best Practices for Using Agent Plugins Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Agent Plugins while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Agent Plugins is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and 合规性 with your 安全性 policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Agent Plugins and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from 安全性 patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Agent Plugins only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for 安全性 advisories

Subscribe to Agent Plugins's 安全性 advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Agent Plugins is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid Agent Plugins?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Agent Plugins in these scenarios:

For each scenario, evaluate whether Agent Plugins的信任评分为 69.3/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual 安全性 assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How Agent Plugins Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among productivity tools, the average 信任评分 is 62/100. Agent Plugins's score of 69.3/100 is above the category average of 62/100.

This positions Agent Plugins favorably among productivity tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust 维度.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks 中等 in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

信任评分 History

Nerq continuously monitors Agent Plugins and recalculates its 信任评分 as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or 维护 patterns change, Agent Plugins's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to 安全性 and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced 维护, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Agent Plugins's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Agent-Plugins&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — 安全性, 维护, 文档, 合规性, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Agent Plugins are strengthening or weakening over time.

Agent Plugins vs 替代品

In the productivity category, Agent Plugins scores 69.3/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

主要结论

常见问题

Agent Plugins可以安全使用吗?
请谨慎使用。 Agent-Plugins Nerq 信任评分为 69.3/100 (C). 最强信号: 合规性 (100/100). 评分基于 安全性 (0/100), 维护 (1/100), 人气 (0/100), 文档 (1/100).
Agent Plugins's trust score是什么?
Agent-Plugins: 69.3/100 (C). 评分基于: 安全性 (0/100), 维护 (1/100), 人气 (0/100), 文档 (1/100). Compliance: 100/100. 评分会在新数据可用时更新。 API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Agent-Plugins
Agent Plugins有哪些更安全的替代品?
In the productivity category, 评分更高的替代品包括 CherryHQ/cherry-studio (84/100), ToolJet/ToolJet (91/100), PostHog/posthog (75/100). Agent-Plugins scores 69.3/100.
How often is Agent Plugins's safety score updated?
Nerq continuously monitors Agent Plugins and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. 数据来源于 multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Current: 69.3/100 (C), last 已验证 2026-04-02. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Agent-Plugins
我可以在受监管环境中使用Agent Plugins吗?
Agent Plugins has not reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Additional due diligence is recommended for regulated environments.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Disclaimer: Nerq 信任评分是基于公开信号的自动评估。它们不构成建议或保证。请始终进行自己的验证。

We use cookies for analytics and caching. 隐私 Policy