Coffecrawler安全吗?

Coffecrawler — Nerq 信任评分 63.9/100 (C级). 基于5个信任维度的分析,被评估为总体安全但存在一些担忧。 最后更新:2026-04-03。

请谨慎使用Coffecrawler。 Coffecrawler is a software tool Nerq 信任评分为 63.9/100 (C), based on 5 独立数据维度. 低于推荐阈值 70。 安全性: 0/100. 维护: 0/100. Popularity: 0/100. 数据来源于 multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. 最后更新: 2026-04-03. 机器可读数据(JSON).

Coffecrawler安全吗?

谨慎 — Coffecrawler Nerq 信任评分为 63.9/100 (C). 信任信号中等,但存在一些值得关注的方面. 适合用于开发环境 — 在生产部署前请查看安全性和维护信号.

安全分析 → {name}隐私报告 →

Coffecrawler的信任评分是多少?

Coffecrawler Nerq 信任评分为 63.9/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured 维度 including 安全性, 维护, and 社区采用.

安全性
0
合规性
100
维护
0
文档
1
人气
0

Coffecrawler的主要安全发现是什么?

Coffecrawler's strongest signal is 合规性 at 100/100. No 已知漏洞 have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

安全性 score: 0/100 (weak)
维护: 0/100 — 低维护活动
Compliance: 100/100 — covers 52 of 52 司法管辖区s
Documentation: 1/100 — 文档有限
Popularity: 0/100 — 1 在以下平台的星标 github

Coffecrawler是什么,谁在维护它?

开发者Ldeveloper-Ui
类别coding
星标1
来源https://github.com/Ldeveloper-Ui/CoffeCrawler
Protocolsrest

合规性

EU AI Act Risk ClassMINIMAL
Compliance Score100/100
管辖权sAssessed across 52 司法管辖区s

coding中的热门替代品

Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT
74.7/100 · B
github
ollama/ollama
73.8/100 · B
github
langchain-ai/langchain
86.4/100 · A
github
x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools
73.8/100 · B
github
anomalyco/opencode
87.9/100 · A
github

What Is Coffecrawler?

Coffecrawler is a software tool in the coding category: CoffeCrawler is an AI-powered web crawling library with human-like activity.. It has 1 GitHub stars. Nerq 信任评分: 64/100 (C).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including 安全性 vulnerabilities, 维护 activity, license 合规性, and 社区采用.

How Nerq Assesses Coffecrawler's Safety

Nerq's 信任评分 is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five 维度. Here is how Coffecrawler performs in each:

The overall 信任评分 of 63.9/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Who Should Use Coffecrawler?

Coffecrawler is designed for:

Risk guidance: Coffecrawler is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its 安全性 posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.

How to Verify Coffecrawler's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — 查看 repository's 安全性 policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active 维护.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for 已知漏洞 in Coffecrawler's dependency tree.
  3. 评论 permissions — Understand what access Coffecrawler requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Coffecrawler in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=CoffeCrawler
  6. 查看 license — Confirm that Coffecrawler's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses 安全性 concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Coffecrawler

When evaluating whether Coffecrawler is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Coffecrawler processes, stores, and transmits your data. 查看 tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency 安全性

Check Coffecrawler's dependency tree for 已知漏洞. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher 安全性 risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Coffecrawler. 安全性 patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Coffecrawler connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP 合规性

Verify that Coffecrawler's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Coffecrawler in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Coffecrawler and the EU AI Act

Coffecrawler is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.

Nerq's 合规性 assessment covers 52 司法管辖区s worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal 合规性.

Best Practices for Using Coffecrawler Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Coffecrawler while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Coffecrawler is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and 合规性 with your 安全性 policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Coffecrawler and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from 安全性 patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Coffecrawler only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for 安全性 advisories

Subscribe to Coffecrawler's 安全性 advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Coffecrawler is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid Coffecrawler?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Coffecrawler in these scenarios:

For each scenario, evaluate whether Coffecrawler的信任评分为 63.9/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual 安全性 assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How Coffecrawler Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average 信任评分 is 62/100. Coffecrawler's score of 63.9/100 is above the category average of 62/100.

This positions Coffecrawler favorably among coding tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust 维度.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks 中等 in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

信任评分 History

Nerq continuously monitors Coffecrawler and recalculates its 信任评分 as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or 维护 patterns change, Coffecrawler's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to 安全性 and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced 维护, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Coffecrawler's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=CoffeCrawler&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — 安全性, 维护, 文档, 合规性, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Coffecrawler are strengthening or weakening over time.

Coffecrawler vs 替代品

In the coding category, Coffecrawler scores 63.9/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

主要结论

常见问题

Coffecrawler可以安全使用吗?
请谨慎使用。 CoffeCrawler Nerq 信任评分为 63.9/100 (C). 最强信号: 合规性 (100/100). 评分基于 安全性 (0/100), 维护 (0/100), 人气 (0/100), 文档 (1/100).
Coffecrawler's trust score是什么?
CoffeCrawler: 63.9/100 (C). 评分基于: 安全性 (0/100), 维护 (0/100), 人气 (0/100), 文档 (1/100). Compliance: 100/100. 评分会在新数据可用时更新。 API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=CoffeCrawler
Coffecrawler有哪些更安全的替代品?
In the coding category, 评分更高的替代品包括 Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT (75/100), ollama/ollama (74/100), langchain-ai/langchain (86/100). CoffeCrawler scores 63.9/100.
How often is Coffecrawler's safety score updated?
Nerq continuously monitors Coffecrawler and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. 数据来源于 multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Current: 63.9/100 (C), last 已验证 2026-04-03. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=CoffeCrawler
我可以在受监管环境中使用Coffecrawler吗?
Coffecrawler has not reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Additional due diligence is recommended for regulated environments.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Disclaimer: Nerq 信任评分是基于公开信号的自动评估。它们不构成建议或保证。请始终进行自己的验证。

We use cookies for analytics and caching. 隐私 Policy