Tool Filter安全吗?
Tool Filter — Nerq Trust Score 44.7/100 (E级). 基于3个信任维度的分析,被评估为存在值得注意的安全问题。 最后更新:2026-07-15。
请对Tool Filter保持警惕。 Tool Filter 是一个software tool Nerq 信任分数 44.7/100(E), 基于3个独立数据维度. 低于 Nerq 验证阈值 维护: 0/100. 人气度: 0/100. 数据来源于多个公共来源,包括包注册表、GitHub、NVD、OSV.dev和OpenSSF Scorecard。最后更新:2026-07-15。 机器可读数据(JSON).
Tool Filter安全吗?
NO — USE WITH CAUTION — Tool Filter has a Nerq Trust Score of 44.7/100 (E). 信任信号低于平均水平,存在重大缺口 in 安全性, 维护, or 文档. Not recommended for production use without thorough manual review and additional 安全性 measures.
Tool Filter的信任评分是多少?
Tool Filter 的 Nerq 信任分数为 44.7/100,等级为 E。该分数基于 3 个独立测量的维度,包括安全性、维护和社区采用。
Tool Filter的主要安全发现是什么?
Tool Filter 最强的信号是 维护,为 0/100。 未检测到已知漏洞。 尚未达到 Nerq 认证阈值 70+。
Tool Filter是什么,谁在维护它?
| 开发者 | https://github.com/respawn-app/tool-filter-mcp |
| 类别 | 基础设施 |
| 星标 | 33 |
| 来源 | https://github.com/respawn-app/tool-filter-mcp |
infrastructure中的热门替代品
What Is Tool Filter?
Tool Filter is a software tool in the infrastructure category: Proxy server that filters tools from upstream MCP servers using configurable regex patterns to control which tools are exposed to clients.. It has 33 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 45/100 (E).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including 安全性 vulnerabilities, 维护 activity, license 合规性, and 社区采用.
How Nerq Assesses Tool Filter's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five 维度. Here is how Tool Filter performs in each:
- 维护 (0/100): Tool Filter is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API 文档, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. 基于 GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 44.7/100 (E) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Tool Filter?
Tool Filter is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with infrastructure tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: We recommend caution with Tool Filter. The low trust score suggests potential risks in 安全性, 维护, or community support. Consider using a more established alternative for any production or sensitive workload.
How to Verify Tool Filter's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — 查看 repository 安全性 policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active 维护.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Tool Filter's dependency tree. - 评论 permissions — Understand what access Tool Filter requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Tool Filter in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Tool Filter - 查看 license — Confirm that Tool Filter's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses 安全性 concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Tool Filter
When evaluating whether Tool Filter is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Tool Filter processes, stores, and transmits your data. 查看 tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Tool Filter's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher 安全性 risk.
Regularly check for updates to Tool Filter. 安全性 patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Tool Filter connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Tool Filter's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Tool Filter in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Best Practices for Using Tool Filter Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Tool Filter while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Tool Filter is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and 合规性 with your 安全性 policies.
Ensure Tool Filter and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from 安全性 patches.
Grant Tool Filter only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Tool Filter's 安全性 advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Tool Filter is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Tool Filter?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Tool Filter in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional 合规性 review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Tool Filter's trust score of 44.7/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual 安全性 assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Tool Filter Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among infrastructure tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Tool Filter's score of 44.7/100 is below the category average of 62/100.
This suggests that Tool Filter trails behind many comparable infrastructure tools. Organizations with strict 安全性 requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks 中等 in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Tool Filter and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or 维护 patterns change, Tool Filter's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to 安全性 and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced 维护, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Tool Filter's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Tool Filter&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — 安全性, 维护, 文档, 合规性, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Tool Filter are strengthening or weakening over time.
Tool Filter vs 替代品
In the infrastructure category, Tool Filter scores 44.7/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Tool Filter vs langflow — Trust Score: 64.6/100
- Tool Filter vs dify — Trust Score: 64.0/100
- Tool Filter vs open-webui — Trust Score: 59.8/100
主要结论
- Tool Filter has a Trust Score of 44.7/100 (E) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Tool Filter has significant trust gaps. Consider higher-rated alternatives unless specific requirements mandate its use.
- Among infrastructure tools, Tool Filter scores below the category average of 62/100, suggesting room for improvement relative to peers.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
常见问题
Tool Filter安全吗?
Tool Filter的信任评分是多少?
Tool Filter有哪些更安全的替代品?
Tool Filter的安全评分多久更新一次?
我可以在受监管的环境中使用Tool Filter吗?
另请参阅
Disclaimer: Nerq 信任评分是基于公开信号的自动评估。它们不构成建议或保证。请始终进行自己的验证。