ClamAV vs Panda Security — Trust Score Comparison

Name: ClamAV vs Panda Security Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of ClamAV and Panda Security. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

ClamAV scores 63.8/100 (C+) while Panda Security scores 65.2/100 (B-) on the Nerq Trust Score. The two agents are essentially tied on overall trust. ClamAV is a uncategorized agent with 15,000 stars. Panda Security is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars.

ClamAV

63.8

C+

Categoryuncategorized

Stars15,000

Sourceantivirus

Security90

Maintenance50

Documentation50

Panda Security

65.2

B-

Categoryuncategorized

Stars0

Sourceantivirus

Security90

Maintenance50

Documentation50

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	ClamAV	Panda Security
Trust Score	63.8/100	65.2/100
Grade	C+	B-
Stars	15,000	0
Category	uncategorized	uncategorized
Security	90	90
Compliance	N/A	N/A
Maintenance	50	50
Documentation	50	50
EU AI Act Risk	N/A	N/A
Verified	No	No

Verdict

ClamAV (63.8) and Panda Security (65.2) have nearly identical trust scores. Both are solid choices. The decision should come down to your specific use case, team preferences, and integration requirements rather than trust differences.

Detailed Analysis

Security

ClamAV leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to Panda Security's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

ClamAV demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (50/100 vs 50/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

ClamAV has better documentation (50/100 vs 50/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

ClamAV has 15,000 GitHub stars while Panda Security has 0. ClamAV has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose ClamAV if you need:

Larger community (15,000 vs 0 stars)

Choose Panda Security if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Switching from ClamAV to Panda Security (or vice versa)

When migrating between ClamAV and Panda Security, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: ClamAV (uncategorized) and Panda Security (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the ClamAV safety report and Panda Security safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: ClamAV has 15,000 stars and Panda Security has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

ClamAV Safety Report Panda Security Safety Report ClamAV Alternatives Panda Security Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, ClamAV or Panda Security?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, ClamAV has a trust score of 63.8/100 (C+) while Panda Security scores 65.2/100 (B-). Both agents are very close in overall trust. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do ClamAV and Panda Security compare on security?

ClamAV has a security score of 90/100 and Panda Security scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. ClamAV's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while Panda Security's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use ClamAV or Panda Security?

The choice depends on your requirements. ClamAV (uncategorized, 15,000 stars) and Panda Security (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, ClamAV scores 63.8/100 and Panda Security scores 65.2/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (50 vs 50), and maintenance activity (50 vs 50).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-11-08 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.